Google Images

Pace2008

Is it me, or has Google Images just had a stroke?

starbelgrade

A stroke of what?

Luno

Let me google that for you

laugh

google boobies

Scráib

They've improved the images results page. Better than the older one actually!

NoHornJan

Pace2008 wrote: »

Is it me, or has Google Images just had a stroke?

Check for facial distortion and slurred speech...

wonton

Pace2008 wrote: »

Is it me, or has Google Images just had a stroke?

you had a stroke?.......**** google images go to the hospital dude!

Killer Pigeon

M&S* wrote: »

Let me google that for you

Nice input genius ... gawd.

TouchingVirus

Do not want!

There's no way to tell how many results you've got displayed on the page (the more you've got the less relevant to the search terms they appear to be).

By not displayed the images in a tabular format you can get changing numbers of pictures every row leading to a very cluttered page.

I now have to hover to see very basic image information like the image size and the domain where it's hosted.

I'm aware that people are all "Eugh, change!", including me, but some of these really seem like a step backwards in terms of usability.

bonerm

Yeah the new image format is a pain in the arse. Much harder to get to the porn I want now.

ibarelycare

TouchingVirus wrote: »

Do not want!

There's no way to tell how many results you've got displayed on the page (the more you've got the less relevant to the search terms they appear to be).

By not displayed the images in a tabular format you can get changing numbers of pictures every row leading to a very cluttered page.

I now have to hover to see very basic image information like the image size and the domain where it's hosted.

I'm aware that people are all "Eugh, change!", including me, but some of these really seem like a step backwards in terms of usability.

If you hold your cursor over the individual picture it will give you the image size and the website.

TouchingVirus

ibarelycare wrote: »

If you hold your cursor over the individual picture it will give you the image size and the website.

TouchingVirus wrote: »

I now have to hover to see very basic image information like the image size and the domain where it's hosted.

I know But now there is no quick way for me to find a particular picture on a particular domain. Beforehand I could scan the whole page very quickly to find that information, now I cannot.

ibarelycare

TouchingVirus wrote: »

I know But now there is no quick way for me to find a particular picture on a particular domain. Beforehand I could scan the whole page very quickly to find that information, now I cannot.

Doh! Sorry, didn't read your whole post!

Luno

Killer Pigeon wrote: »

Nice input genius ... gawd.

:mad:

TouchingVirus

ibarelycare wrote: »

Doh! Sorry, didn't read your whole post!

Maybe I dialed the bitch factor up too high?

Killer Pigeon

M&S* wrote: »

:mad:

Don't put does faces on at me ... the cheek.

Luno

Killer Pigeon wrote: »

Don't put does faces on at me ... the cheek.

Respect your elders pigeon boy!

It's a headwrecker... You can change it at the bottom though but it's still shlte.

Killer Pigeon

M&S* wrote: »

Respect your elders pigeon boy!

I may be a pigeon but at least I don't spend all of my time in Marks and Spencers.

GirlOfGlass

I don't see what's so bad about it.
In fact, I kind of like it...

Pace2008

starbelgrade wrote: »

A stroke of what?

Not one of genius, that's for sure.

For those who haven't looked yet - and I'd advise you not to - the once-friendly Google Images has become a completely demented jumble of randomly sized, borderless images that mesh together into some incomprehensible, hellish collage.

TouchingVirus

Deleted User wrote: »

It's a headwrecker... You can change it at the bottom though but it's still shlte.

:eek:

Cheers for posting that, I actually thought there was no end to the page I had to scroll so much but there it was "Switch to basic version". They should change that text to "Switch to better version" tbh

Elevator

slightly off topic by the same company so feic it

is there a roll-back option for the new YouTube google gave us a while back

it's ****e and the related videos section doesn't throw up theatches it used too

in fact if you search for a particular track now all ya get is the same track in the related

why!!!!?????!!!!

mike65

I just googled "Hungarian Lesbians" it works fine.

DualFrontDiscs

TouchingVirus wrote: »

I know But now there is no quick way for me to find a particular picture on a particular domain. Beforehand I could scan the whole page very quickly to find that information, now I cannot.

Append site:domain.name to your search to limit to that domain. Even easier.

DFD.

biko

Google forum