Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

I wonder who was more intelligent: Leonardo Da Vinci or Albert Einstein?

  • 16-07-2010 8:52am
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 4,005 ✭✭✭


    Both a geniuses no doubt, but Leonardo was born more than 500 years ago and it still vividly remembered today. In the next 500 years there could be such major advances in physics, Einstein might possibly be almost forgotten! Or else still the front-man of the physics of the future.

    In Leonardos time he conceptualised a helicopter, tank, calculator, solar power. Now thats pretty creepy seeing he was alive from 1452 till 1519.

    I say Leonardo wins this intelligent battle, for now anyways.


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,249 ✭✭✭DubMedic


    If you're looking for a serious discussion on this, try HERE.


  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 35,731 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    Leonardo was a bit more polyvalent I reckon. I don't know really; I can make some sense out of what he did but Einstein's work just goes way over my head.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Music Moderators, Politics Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 22,360 CMod ✭✭✭✭Dravokivich


    Neither of them started the first man made fire or invented the wheel...

    What about the blokes that did that?

    Taking 1 mans work and improving it yourself and adding something to it, is not as great as starting the work from scratch yourself.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,215 ✭✭✭Mrmoe


    Newton would kick both their asses.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,807 ✭✭✭Poly


    What about the bloke who put the figs in the fig rolls?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,481 ✭✭✭Fremen


    How about the guy who figured out that if you lie on your arm until it goes to sleep, when you whack off it feels like someone else's doing it?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 34,567 ✭✭✭✭Biggins


    Da Vinci easily.

    He not only had an understanding of maths, biology, science, mechanical appliances etc, he also had the hands-on skills to bring us all the above in great detail through the use of his art, technical drawings of (possible far advanced for his time) applications and engineering projects on top of his ability to write and theorise about all other things metaphysical and in religious nature and study.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,976 ✭✭✭Brendog


    Leonardo da Vinci

    Yes, Albert Einstein was one of the greatsest minds to have ever lived and because of his research and discoveries our live have been enriched.
    but his feild of expertise was primarily located to Physics and Mathematics

    whereas Da Vinci was considered and expert on engineering, architechture, mathematics, biology, art and aviation.

    He though up ideas WAY ahead of his time. Such as, machine guns, cannons, helicopters, submarines, etc.



    Although Albert Einstein has the original rocker nerd!! :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,481 ✭✭✭Fremen


    Brendog wrote: »
    Although Albert Einstein has the original rocker nerd!! :D

    Not even close.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,688 ✭✭✭Kasabian


    Kevin the egghead from BBC's Eggheads programme wins hands down


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 35,731 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    Poly wrote: »
    What about the bloke who put the figs in the fig rolls?

    Fig Newton?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,595 ✭✭✭bonerm


    Mrmoe wrote: »
    Newton would kick both their asses.
    Fig Newton?

    Genius must run in families.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,811 ✭✭✭Gone Drinking


    Me morer smart than both of them


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,918 ✭✭✭✭orourkeda


    homer simpson


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,073 ✭✭✭Xios


    What about the guy that first discovered cows milk? The brave soul s/he is. Could be an ancient ancestor of tom green :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,752 ✭✭✭pablomakaveli


    Archimedes is not amused.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archimedes


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,918 ✭✭✭✭orourkeda


    your ma


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 34,567 ✭✭✭✭Biggins


    I wonder what an over-dinner chat would be like between the two men if they ever were alive at the same time.

    Would we have even understood half of what they might have talked about? LOL :pac:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,115 ✭✭✭Pal


    I'm old enough to remember that Jim Figgerty put the figs in the fig rolls.

    It was a big deal back in 1970.
    A bit like an Irish 'Who shot JR ?' thing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 359 ✭✭messymess


    They're both dead now, they obviously weren't that smart!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,659 ✭✭✭CrazyRabbit


    To correctly answer this question, both Leo and Albert would need to have their IQ measure by multiple identical tests, with the overal average score being used to determine who was most intelligent.

    But since that's is not possible, the question can't be answered.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,688 ✭✭✭Kasabian


    Biggins wrote: »
    I wonder what an over-dinner chat would be like between the two men if they ever were alive at the same time.

    Would we have even understood half of what they might have talked about? LOL :pac:

    The translators could have had a great laugh


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,166 ✭✭✭enda1


    Biggins wrote: »
    I wonder what an over-dinner chat would be like between the two men if they ever were alive at the same time.

    Would we have even understood half of what they might have talked about? LOL :pac:

    LDV: "Parla italiano?"

    AE: "Nein"

    LDV: :(


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,220 ✭✭✭✭biko


    Well, for starters - Da Vinci didn't get a Nobel Prize, did he? Hmm? Hmm?
    *rest my case*


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,706 ✭✭✭Voodu Child


    As is my understanding, Einstein discovered that gravity pushes things down from the sky, and thats how we invented airplanes, stepladders and atomic bombs.

    DaVinci just drew that picture of a fat bird.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,798 ✭✭✭goose2005


    Leonardo was a bit more polyvalent I reckon. I don't know really; I can make some sense out of what he did but Einstein's work just goes way over my head.
    Yes, he could bond with all sorts of atoms.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,391 ✭✭✭✭mikom


    Stephen Hawking is the worlds most intelligent man.
    And I'm not far behind him....... I'm the lad who pushes his wheelchair.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,324 ✭✭✭tallus




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,976 ✭✭✭Brendog


    Fremen wrote: »




    Amy Winehouse is NOT a rocker


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,556 ✭✭✭Deus Ex Machina


    Such things can't really be quantified, so it must come down to personal taste. Da Vinci is my choice. He was a polymath, his work was more independent than Einstein's given the fact that it was seminal in many of his fields of endeavor, I think Einstein relied more on the knowledge which had already been established, some of Da Vinci's ideas are all the more amazing because they appear to have be derived ex nihilo. Both had an appreciation of the beauty which exists within the universe, the beauty of Einstein's work resides in its parsimony, while it is in the aesthetics of Da Vinci's. The fact is that both men had all the ingredients of a true intellect, and had Einstein been born in Da Vinci's time, a time of less specialisation, he may well have extended his efforts as widely as Da Vinci did.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,738 ✭✭✭Naos


    Leonardo was a bit more polyvalent I reckon. I don't know really; I can make some sense out of what he did but Einstein's work just goes way over my head.

    Did you just look that up in the thesauras?


Advertisement