Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Payroll Query

  • 02-07-2010 1:49pm
    #1
    Kildare78
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17 ✭


    Hi All

    Was wondering if anyone could shed some light on the following:

    We hired a guy in April and he had no P45 or previous employment details so I rang revenue with his PPS number - they gave me tax credits/cutt offs for him and told me to leave him on Week 1 basis for tax. They have since sent me info on his tax credits through ROS and under the Wk1/M1 they have printed 1 where under all other employess have 0 -cannot get anyone from Revenue on the phone all week and am just wondering if I should take him off week 1 and put him to commulative? I thought Week 1 basis only applied for a short period of time???

    Any advice is very much appreciated.


Comments

  • #2
    J.Ryan
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 474 ✭✭J.Ryan


    I'd leave him on Week 1 for the moment, it sounds like that is how they are now designating W1/M1 status, but you are right to want to clarify.


  • #3
    Bookkeeper09
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 266 ✭✭Bookkeeper09


    Had he worked for someone else this year prior to being employed by you??


  • #4
    J.Ryan
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 474 ✭✭J.Ryan


    Bookkeeper09 wrote: »
    Had he worked for someone else this year prior to being employed by you??


    The OP wasn't told

    Kildare78 wrote: »
    Hi All

    .....We hired a guy in April and he had no P45 or previous employment details .......


  • #5
    Bookkeeper09
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 266 ✭✭Bookkeeper09


    What I was getting at was....had he not got exact details....ie the final figures from his P45.....surely he knew if he had worked previously!


  • #6
    J.Ryan
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 474 ✭✭J.Ryan


    There was no P45 given to the OP, sometimes that happens if people were working "casually" and as so the Revenue tend to stick with W1/M1 to encourage the tax payer to file a form 12 after the year end to recover any tax overpaid.


  • Advertisement
  • #7
    Kildare78
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17 ✭Kildare78


    Hi All

    Thanks for replys - employee had worked for a guy before but had not been given a P45 when he left (i took it that it wasn't a happy ending so asked no more)


    I just felt it has gone on a bit now and would like to clarify one way or the other for his tax - obviously it would be better for the employee to be on comulative.

    With a bit of luck, I'll get someone in the revenue next week to get some answers from them - that way I'll be happy that I am complying to what they require.

    Thanks again to you all
    Have a great weekend!!!
    :)


Advertisement