Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Outboard Mixers...

  • 31-05-2010 11:34am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,093 ✭✭✭


    I was in town on Saturday checking the usual haunts. It seems the price of outboard analogue mixers have come down considerably...I'm not talking about a high-end Mackie with state-of-the-art pres and digital functionality...I'm talking about your run-of-the-mill, 8-pre, unpowered job.

    Given that I could pick up something similar by Yamaha for three or four hundred lids, I'm wondering how many of you who operate in the Hobby spectrum of things use a mixer to route subs to your interface? Anybody use it to send, say, a drums bus to two stereo outs? There's something appealing about learning to mix old-skool, in the box (probbaly because I missed it first time around).

    What do you guys think?


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 352 ✭✭splitrmx


    I record only synths and drum machines but I use an analogue mixer to sum everything to two tracks and record that with an audio interface. I think the analogue mixing desk gives the mix a bit more "air" or something, makes it sound less clinical than when I mixed it all in Logic.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,892 ✭✭✭madtheory


    For and against:

    Something with transformers in the audio path will give that "glue" effect on a mix. Nothing in the "budget" range has those though.

    Not many budget desks have eq that's better than your average plugin- maybe A&H and Soundcraft, but that's it.

    It's great to have actual faders to mix on, but you get that with a control surface.

    Just adding noise can make a mix glue together too.

    A mixer is good for recording snare/ toms top and bottom to one track in the DAW. Saves mix time, tracks and processing power.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,093 ✭✭✭TelePaul


    madtheory wrote: »
    For and against:

    Something with transformers in the audio path will give that "glue" effect on a mix. Nothing in the "budget" range has those though.

    Not many budget desks have eq that's better than your average plugin- maybe A&H and Soundcraft, but that's it.

    It's great to have actual faders to mix on, but you get that with a control surface.

    Just adding noise can make a mix glue together too.

    A mixer is good for recording snare/ toms top and bottom to one track in the DAW. Saves mix time, tracks and processing power.

    Hey man thanks for the reply. The snare thing is a great idea and is pretty much what I figured - not trying to re-invent the wheel, just trying to get smart with my workflow. Wasn't sure if you were serious about the 'adding noise' thing :o


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,892 ✭✭✭madtheory


    You're welcome :). And I'm totally serious about the noise thing. Someone mentioned it on GS recently, and I realised that was a large part of the change from analogue to digital, for me. But take into consideration that I spent most of my time with lower end analogue stuff.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,472 ✭✭✭Rockshamrover


    I've been wondering about this too.

    Apart from the glue aspect of a mixer, they are meant to be great for automation as in riding the faders.

    Would you have any recommendations for a specific desk Madtheory or anyone else?

    There's always mixers coming up on adverts.ie but I haven't a clue which ones can actually work with a DAW.

    Thanks


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,892 ✭✭✭madtheory


    Riding faders is best done with a controller, ITB is the way to go IMHO. From what I've used- The Euphonix is a great controller. D Command is nice too, but the build quality is not so good. I use a Behringer BCF2000 at home, LOL. :) I wouldn't recommend analogue for mixing, no recall.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,472 ✭✭✭Rockshamrover


    madtheory wrote: »
    Riding faders is best done with a controller, ITB is the way to go IMHO. From what I've used- The Euphonix is a great controller. D Command is nice too, but the build quality is not so good. I use a Behringer BCF2000 at home, LOL. :) I wouldn't recommend analogue for mixing, no recall.

    Thanks for that MT. The Euphonix stuff looks incredible but it's very pricey.

    Is it just a control surface or does it do anything else?


  • Site Banned Posts: 4,415 ✭✭✭MilanPan!c


    I would say that there's v little point to analogue mixers except to sum drums into a stereo in on an audio interface....

    A control surface can be v cheap, esp if you accept that you prolly DON'T use 8 channels at once... In other words, a 2, 4 or even one channel control surface is gonna be a LOT cheaper and in MANY cases as effective as a big expensive 8-16 channel surface.


    What was that cool one channel slider thing? Someone on here was gonna buy one... Anyone remember?

    I meant to buy one then forgot. :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,892 ✭✭✭madtheory


    Alphatrack is the one fader thing.
    Thanks for that MT. The Euphonix stuff looks incredible but it's very pricey.

    Is it just a control surface or does it do anything else?
    It's "just" a controller. I only used the fader bit. There are two other bits as well, one's for transport control, I can't remember what the other one is for. Try the Behringer...


Advertisement