ZV numbers with 5 digits

corktina

does ANYONE like these?

Sids Not

Dont like ZV plates at all....

JoeySully

I have one - make no difference to me really
Its always a conversation starter cause nobody can tell what year is is.

alpina

Not unless displayed as; ZV XX XXX & that even looks long:(

macplaxton

PITA, one too many digits to fit on a properly sized period plate.

carchaeologist

Four Digits good,five digits bad. I cant stand them,though i know most people couldnt give a toss. And the fact correctly sized digits wont fit a standard plate properly too is annoying. Though most year plates have the same problem.
I know it was just a stroke of a pen in some office somewhere,but a bit more consultation should have been done on it before it was signed over to the five digit layout. After most of this century of only four numbers,someone decides that five will be a good idea,and will look the same.

It wouldnt be so bad if there was no other option,but there is entire series' of unused numbers still out there.

Yes,i know its a small thing in the big picture, but like a stone in your shoe it bugs me.

cian1500ww

We should be glad they're still giving out ZV numbers, I'd hate to have to stick a normal reg on an old car.

carchaeologist

cian1500ww wrote: »

We should be glad they're still giving out ZV numbers, I'd hate to have to stick a normal reg on an old car.

Given the choice,id go with normal every time.

corktina

interesrtingly I bought new plates fro my cars....2 of them I love the third Im not sure about....





guess which one Im not keen on....

( i dont do ZV numbers...just looks stupid at a show with all the numbers nearly in one series

alpina

Have you mocked up a plate to read; 73 C1 044, if I get stuck with 5 digits in Clare next year would have a look at that.

corktina

no but iwas sorely tempted to put 73-C9-00 on the taunus a la france or belgium........:cool: