Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Welcome...to the world of tomorrow!

  • 02-04-2010 5:59pm
    #1
    Fenster
    Closed Accounts Posts: 4,763 ✭✭✭


    Stolen from Petapixel: Future of Photography..?
    The clone tool wrote:
    CCD photos will certainly be impossible to use for documentation. It's just
    too damn easy to manipulate them!
    Will a CCD go above 1.3 megapixels? wrote:
    Current best CCD array that I have seen is from Kodak (1.3 million pixel @ $14,000. single quantity price). There is a $25,000. F3 Nikon databack in beta test that uses this. Therefore CCD image capture seems today to be ~100 times lower resolution that today's better 35mm films. Will our lenses let us get to 200 lines/mm?
    Digital point and shoot cameras wrote:
    I think that electronic cameras will break into the "point and shoot" market. Their ease of use and quick turnaround are very appealing to snapshooters. Film will still be popular, probably as popular as now or more so. Computer imaging still doesn't hold a candle to good ol' silver halides for resolution and color. Some computer scanners do a damn good job, but CCD's? Not anytime in the near future
    F*****g sepia tones! wrote:
    Home editing will be very popular among the snapshooters with their CCD still cameras. Don't want ugly uncle Bob draining that beer in the background? No problem! A few keystrokes and it's bye-bye Bob! Auto color-balancing will be handy. People could experiment with toning without all those harsh chemicals. More snapshooters could experience the wonder of black and white. It would be very easy to convert a color picture to black and white. Another keystroke (or maybe keys will be obsolete?) and the print could be sepia toned, for that high-tech old-fashioned look.


Comments

  • #2
    pullandbang
    Hosted Moderators Posts: 4,948 ✭✭✭pullandbang


    That's funny to read now. These are the same people that said the earth wasn't flat - fools, of course it's flat, everyone knows that!


  • #3
    eas
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,435 ✭✭✭eas


    in fairness if we started a thread on where we thought photography would be in 20 years... we'd be mostly wrong too.


  • #4
    joeKel73
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,689 ✭✭✭joeKel73


    That is really interesting to read!!
    Right now, 1 Megabyte of memory costs about $45 retail.
    So a 4GB card would cost around $180,000 . :p


Advertisement