Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

help with organic chem Q please :)

  • 10-03-2010 4:55pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 467 ✭✭


    Hi
    Just wondering if someone could explain this answer to me:

    Which of the following isomers has the lowest heat of combustion?

    1. cis-1,2-dimethylcyclohexane
    2. trans-1,2-dimethylcyclohexane
    3. cis-1,3-dimethylcyclohexane
    4. trans-1,3-dimethylcyclohexane

    The answer is 3 but for reasons that are unclear to me. Firstly, I though trans isomers were more stable thus less reactive thus might have a lower heat of combustion; secondly why 1,3 dimethyl and not 1,2 - what is the difference?
    Please help if you have any idea :) Thanks


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 193 ✭✭Marvinthefish


    I'd suggest drawing out all four structures in the chair representation and add the methyl groups. Or even better, make models so you can easily where the methyl groups are in space.
    cyclohexane-chair-conformer.gif

    I drew them out and one looks like it would definitely have a lower heat of combustion. Why? You have to imagine how millions of the these molecules will interact with each other : bumping into each other and maybe stacking on top of one another as they whizz around the flask...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 467 ✭✭etymon


    Thanks Marvin

    I did that and figured out what I was doing wrong; I was mixing cis and trans with axial/equatorial... duh....


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 148 ✭✭bazza1981


    With 3 both the methyl's will occupy the equatorial position, which is the most stable confirmation
    number 2 will also have this confirmation, but the reason 3 has a lower heat of combustion is as it has no steric interactions like 2 as the methyl is one carbon further away.
    1 and 4 both have an eq and ax methyl.


Advertisement