Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

LEIBNIZ VS NEWTON. TO. THE. DEATH.

  • 27-02-2010 5:32pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25


    Everyones favorite Maths fight.
    Who do YOU think should be rightly and totally credited with the invention of Infinitesimal: Differential and Integral calculus?

    Personally given the formation and presentation of the work, I think ol Jeff Leibniz was the man on the money. However, its up for a lotta debate.
    Have at it.








    PS.

    (No German or British racism plz)





    PPS.

    (unless its reasonably funny)


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,202 ✭✭✭✭Pherekydes


    Not sure who wins, but whoever it was it certainly wasn't Jeff Leibniz.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25 Audacious


    Jeffrey is the English form of Gottfried...

    Dont have to be Newton to work that out.

    Less of the pedantic, more of the mathematic.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,481 ✭✭✭Fremen


    We call it Calculus, rather than Fluxions and Fluents. History appears to have decided.
    (Though Newton did do it first and only avoided publishing because his corpuscular theory of light got trashed so badly)

    Edit:
    Round two:
    Paul Erdős V. Alte Selberg over the elementary proof of the prime number theorem.
    FIGHT!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 271 ✭✭Clinker


    Audacious wrote: »
    Jeffrey is the English form of Gottfried...

    Dont have to be Newton to work that out.

    Less of the pedantic, more of the mathematic.

    Sticking with the pedantry, Godfrey would be the English equivalent of Gottfried, though obviously it doesn't allow you the boyish raciness of "Jeff Leibniz".


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,151 ✭✭✭Thomas_S_Hunterson


    newton_and_leibniz.png
    YYYEEEEEAAAAHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 109 ✭✭ronaldoshaky


    Aren't Leibniz and Newton both considered to have invented calculus independently?

    I find Leibniz notation easier to use. Newton's notation always puts me off. I dont like the dots that he used for identifying derivatives.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,803 ✭✭✭El Siglo


    "Kids kids you can both get me a beer":) They both did it, but we're using Liebniz's notation ever since. By the way, Sean_K - brilliant!:D


Advertisement