Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

kooltherm v xtratherm

  • 23-02-2010 4:53pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16


    hi... Is there any difference between kooltherm and xtratherm sheets? Planning on putting in xtratherm 50mm + 12.5mm plasterboard. I was told recently that kooltherm do a 40mm insulation and 9mm plasterboard thermal liner which has a better u-value. Anyone else hear about this?:confused:


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 122 ✭✭justflow1983


    All of these companies publish data sheets that tell you all about U-values, thermal conductivity etc. You should be able to pull it off their websites. Is this for new build or a refurb?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16 mise_mise


    new build


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 122 ✭✭justflow1983


    Ok well in that case, make sure you have 2x more insulation on the outside than you do drylining the inside. Otherwise you have cold bridge risks where your interior partitions meet your exterior walls, as well as condensation risk at the contact point between your exterior wall and the insulation.

    For Xtratherm,see page 3 here http://www.ribaproductselector.com/Docs/0/20560/external/COL1320560.pdf?ac= to see the U-values of their drylining products as well as the recommended buildup (see the insulation on both sides)

    The equivalent chart for kooltherm is on page 5 here http://www.insulation.kingspan.com/uk/pdf/k18.pdf


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 122 ✭✭justflow1983


    I have to stress that one of the following, mounted to the exterior face of a single-leaf wall, is a much better use of of your money. You will get much better performance and have a much lower risk of dampness, mould, and moisture problems in the future:
    http://www.insulation.kingspan.com/uk/tw53.htm

    If you really want a cavity wall, use something like the following system:
    http://www.xtratherm.com/products/literature/thinrcloserirl.pdf
    http://www.xtratherm.com/products/literature/thinrcplusirl.pdf
    http://www.insulation.kingspan.com/uk/k8.htm

    The drylining systems you mentioned would still be good to use with one of the above systems. I would not use them on their own, its just a half-assed way to do it and since its a new build you may as well build it right rather than going about it backwards.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,433 ✭✭✭sinnerboy


    Be careful about PIR's and external wall insulation ( EWI) .

    As far as I know not one EWI system supplier includes PIR in their IAB certification

    One did untill March 09 when the NSAI amended that companies certificate to exclude PIR

    Check here first

    http://www.nsai.ie/Our-Services/Certification/Agrement-Certification/Search-Agrements-Certificates.aspx


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 122 ✭✭justflow1983


    for the OP PIR=Proprietary Insulated Render. Very good to know, I hadn't checked that they didn't have the certs.

    My preferred way would be to actually use a regular cavity insulation, and then battens + a render backer and render onto that. Or use some other type of cladding, but in Ireland it seems to be a hassle to get something like Aluminium or cement fibre through planning.


  • Subscribers Posts: 42,171 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    for the OP PIR=Proprietary Insulated Render. .

    justflow...

    PIR = Polyisocyranuate


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 122 ✭✭justflow1983


    :rolleyes: wow..... so much for clarity there.....:rolleyes:


  • Subscribers Posts: 42,171 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    :rolleyes: wow..... so much for clarity there.....:rolleyes:

    :confused:

    edited: clarified :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 122 ✭✭justflow1983


    I posted that because I made the whole thing really confusing by misreading sinnerboys post. I was making fun of myself.


  • Advertisement
  • Subscribers Posts: 42,171 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    I posted that because I made the whole thing really confusing by misreading sinnerboys post. I was making fun of myself.

    i apologies for taking you up wrong.... ;)

    ill edit my previous post... :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 495 ✭✭ardara1


    sinnerboy wrote: »
    Be careful about PIR's and external wall insulation ( EWI) .

    As far as I know not one EWI system supplier includes PIR in their IAB certification

    One did untill March 09 when the NSAI amended that companies certificate to exclude PIR

    Check here first

    http://www.nsai.ie/Our-Services/Certification/Agrement-Certification/Search-Agrements-Certificates.aspx

    Yoou mean Phenolic SB - Not PIR


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 561 ✭✭✭clogher71


    The Kooltherm 52.5 is pricey. I think it is a higher spec than the Kingspan tw56, which is more in line with the Xtratherm board. 10% more efficent the Kingspan Technical Department claims. Its about E12-E15+vat per board more than a tw56 board.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,433 ✭✭✭sinnerboy


    ardara1 wrote: »
    Yoou mean Phenolic SB - Not PIR
    :o true


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 561 ✭✭✭clogher71


    Mise, did you do anymore reserch? the kooltherm board 40+9.5 is a K16 board. Going to try get a price for them from a local unfriendly builder providers next week. last week the xtratherm was E4.oo/per board + vat cheaper than the kingspan tw56 in 52.5mm


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,992 ✭✭✭✭recedite


    The kingspan K range of phenolic foam superseded the T range of PIR in 2008 with U values down to 0.022 from previous 0.0225

    The O.P. probably refers to Xtratherm Xtb range, manufactured with CFC gas bubbles, which gets it down to 0.019.:cool:


Advertisement