The vagina is the worlds biggest polluter.

Pappy o' daniel

http://www.greenandsave.com/green_news/green-lifestyle/study-less-babies-best-climate-change-solution-4978



Its disturbing that Al Gore covered this up for so long, but ive always thought that there was something fishy about "an inconvenient truth".

funk-you

What a load of twat.

-Funk

Riamfada

Im the only man in an office of 6 people. Should I open that?

pq0n1ct4ve8zf5

Grimes wrote: »

Im the only man in an office of 6 people. Should I open that?

Yes, stop being a pussy

thirtythirty

I knew there was something fishy about them...

mikom

Pappy o' daniel wrote: »

Its disturbing that Al Gore covered this up for so long, but ive always thought that there was something fishy about "an inconvenient truth".

What's the difference between a vagina and Al Gore?
One is a female sex organ, the other is a cunt.

Wazdakka

Save the Planet..

Abortions for all.

sbsquarepants

f.uck them, f.uck them all

kicom

We now have a good reason to ban Catholicism. And because science backs us up, we're fully justified in exterminating them.

WindSock

What are they going to do? Impose a fanny fart tax?

bluto63

Really, did they need to do a study to figure this out?

Bazzy

Thats a load of flaps

prinz

kicom wrote: »

We now have a good reason to ban Catholicism. And because science backs us up, we're fully justified in exterminating them.

Unfunny and factually wrong.

patmac

As a DINKY I shall use this answer when nosy feckers ask us why we don't have any children.
I saw a comedian on Charlie Bookers Newswipe (BBC3) making the same observation apparently a woman increases her Carbon Footprint 40 times for every child she spawns.
I'm off to trade in my Prius in for a 1983 5 litre diesel Jag safe in the knowledge that I am saving the planet by being sprog free.

ibarelycare

Ah. I thought this was going to be about queafing.

bonerm

Wazdakka wrote: »

Save the Planet..

Abortions for all.

Abortions for some, miniature durex flags for others.

Delirium

We need a Gee-8 summit to try and find a solution to this problem.

bonerm

koth wrote: »

We need a Gee-8 summit to try and find a solution to this problem.

Pity George W. Bush isn't around anymore, he wouldn't stand for all this fannying about.

syklops

WindSock wrote: »

What are they going to do? Impose a fanny fart tax?

You obviously didnt read the article.

Here it is for everyone else:

Reproducing less would have the greatest impact on battling climate change and contraception is the cheapest form of “green” technology, a study by the London School of Economics (LSE) says.

The basic premise of Fewer Emitters, Lower Emissions, Less Cost is that fewer people populating the planet will mean less pollution that leads to global warming.

In a Sept. 10 press release, LSE says contraception is nearly five times cheaper than traditional green technologies put to use to halt climate change. Given that 40 percent of pregnancies in the world are unplanned, according to the United Nations, family planning would serve as a substantial solution to lowering greenhouse gas emissions, it says.

The report, commissioned by the Optimum Population Trust, concludes that family planning should be considered one of the primary methods of reducing harmful emissions.

The link between population and climate issues is a platform Optimum Population Trust has been pushing for some time. The Trust believes attention to family planning needs would save carbon dioxide emissions equivalent to six times what the United States emits annually. Roger Martin, chair of Optimum Population Trust, said the findings vindicated the organization’s stance that population growth must be included in the climate change debate.

“It’s always been obvious that total emissions depend on the number of emitters as well as their individual emissions — the carbon tonnage can’t shoot down, as we want, while the population keeps shooting up. The taboo on mentioning this fact has made the whole climate change debate so far somewhat unreal. Stabilising population levels has always been essential ecologically, and this study shows it’s economically sensible too.

“The population issue must now be added into the negotiations for the Copenhagen climate change summit in December. This part of the solution is so easy, and so cheap, and would bring so many other social and economic benefits, from health and education to the empowerment of women. It would also ease all the other environmental problems we face — the rapid shrinkage of soil, fresh water, forests, fisheries, wildlife and oil reserves and the looming food crisis,” Martin said.

Makes alot of sense to me.

WindSock

syklops wrote: »

You obviously didnt read the article.

I read enough of it to see it's nothing new.

The world is over populated. Shocker! :eek:

Of course the 1 child policy is working out well in China, when this generation dies out, the population will be back down to the millions. 75% will be men, so less pollutin fanny over there. But of course they will have invaded the western world by then and you know what the Chinese are like, rabbits. That's right. Hairy Japanese bastards.

raah!

So less people means there will be less people polluting?! That guy's a genius.

Jason McCabe

If there are less people on the planet does that mean there are less people's feet on the planet?

dr.bollocko

It is the real inconvenient truth. Pious looking bitch moms looking at me funny for burning houses down and polluting their environment. And they want to save the environment now?
For what?
For their kids?
Hypocrites.
Anyone who wants to claim green credentials should form a child murdering militia or GTFO to some craphole like Australia that there is already no hope for and leave the rest of us happy non-parents to slightly pollute the world which would have been fine if you'da just kept your damn fool legs crossed missis!

bronte

Bloody kids. Even when it was the immigants, I knew it was the kids.

Pappy o' daniel

Yes, now you know why sodomy rhymes with God-to-me.

And it will save the planet.

Gingervitis

patmac wrote: »

As a DINKY I shall use this answer when nosy feckers ask us why we don't have any children.
I saw a comedian on Charlie Bookers Newswipe (BBC3) making the same observation apparently a woman increases her Carbon Footprint 40 times for every child she spawns.
I'm off to trade in my Prius in for a 1983 5 litre diesel Jag safe in the knowledge that I am saving the planet by being sprog free.

Clip in question:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YkgDhDa4HHo

BigDuffman

Theres something fishy about this....

tony1kenobi

patmac wrote: »

As a DINKY I shall use this answer when nosy feckers ask us why we don't have any children.
I saw a comedian on Charlie Bookers Newswipe (BBC3) making the same observation apparently a woman increases her Carbon Footprint 40 times for every child she spawns.
I'm off to trade in my Prius in for a 1983 5 litre diesel Jag safe in the knowledge that I am saving the planet by being sprog free.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YkgDhDa4HHo

raah!

People could also reduce their carbon footprints by killing themselves.

SEPT 23 1989

Total rubbish the earths population has peaked and will be on a downward trend from now on

bluecatmorgana

Overpopulation is a problem Ive always believed.
and its probably going to get worse considering that in 2008(9?) the most amount of babies were born in a year in Ireland than for a hundred years.

This and many, many other reasons is why Im never having kids.
Ladies do yourself a favour if you feel the clock ticking, get a dog or a cat.

BluesBerry

All this talk about the kids aww leave them alone

What really needs to be done is go after the old folk all their urine stench clothes are admitting ammonia into the atmosphere do a cull on them the old farts

Will someone think of the children for the love of god think of the children


Apologies to the elderly reading this and nana & gramps I still love ya

kicom

bluecatmorgana wrote: »

Overpopulation is a problem Ive always believed.
and its probably going to get worse considering that in 2008(9?) the most amount of babies were born in a year in Ireland than for a hundred years.

This and many, many other reasons is why Im never having kids.
Ladies do yourself a favour if you feel the clock ticking, get a dog or a cat.

You should try living in Holland. They seem to cope with the population just fine.

Ireland is one of the least dense populations in Europe. And you wonder why we have such high house prices.

Nodin

Wazdakka wrote: »

Save the Planet..

Abortions for all.

...small plastic buckets for others....

Nodin

Pappy o' daniel wrote: »

http://www.greenandsave.com/green_news/green-lifestyle/study-less-babies-best-climate-change-solution-4978



Its disturbing that Al Gore covered this up for so long, but ive always thought that there was something fishy about "an inconvenient truth".

I suspect this is just another media flap over nothing.

MarkR

I thought this thread was going to be about Kerry Katona.

Buford T Justice

Indeed

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0_SAVHHGQzI

goose2005

kicom wrote: »

We now have a good reason to ban Catholicism. And because science backs us up, we're fully justified in exterminating them.

But Catholicism bans premarital sex so it evens out.

And I'm sick of people banging on about overpopulation. They've been doing so ever since the world had 500m people, and when it hits 500bn they'll still be crying "The end is nigh!"

Pherekydes

How is the vagina a polluter?

It produces nothing (except maybe a little love juice).

kicom

goose2005 wrote: »

But Catholicism bans premarital sex so it evens out.

Meh. I'd have 'em exterminated. At least have it so that their mickeys are chopped off at birth.

Jax Teller

Google bluewaffle there

Pherekydes

kicom wrote: »

We now have a good reason to ban Catholicism.

Yes, because clearly only catholics breed.

Nodin

keysersoze_88 wrote: »

Google bluewaffle there

What is seen cannot be unseen....mein eyez...mein eyez....

Nodin

Pherekydes wrote: »

Yes, because clearly only catholics breed.

Tis true. Its a well known fact them protestants are conjured up from hell one at a time.