Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Theoretical question

  • 16-02-2010 12:23pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 16,793 ✭✭✭✭


    A theoretical question for the experts. In the case of say, a 3 year old child cycling on a footpath, has the law been broken even though nobody can be prosecuted for it?
    In the eyes of the law a policy of Conclusive presumption comes into effect, which clearly states a child under the age of twelve cannot be accepted to understand the nature of law, in other words they are deemed incapable of doing wrong.


    It's a "if a tree fall falls in the forest" sort of question. Was a law still broken?


Advertisement