Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Harbour Air

  • 09-02-2010 2:35pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,520 ✭✭✭


    Any word on these guys? They were supposed to be starting this month.
    http://www.harbourair.ie/


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 167 ✭✭airvan


    I read the environmental impact statement. Their main base will be at Mountshannon on Lough Derg and they also state they're waiting for an AOC from the IAA. So if anyone has seen anything happening at Mountshannon let us know.

    I hope it works out.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,793 ✭✭✭John_Mc


    Weather would probably have a lot bigger affect on this type of operation than normal airlines wouldn't it? I would imagine rough seas would prevent it from operating?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 167 ✭✭airvan


    Really I know from experience there is a lot of flyable weather in Ireland over the year, particularly for low level VFR, despite our reputation. Also most of the landing areas will be in sheltered harbours away from the open sea. The proposed Galway landing area is just off the harbour. Foynes would be same and of course lakes are not open sea. So it's doable.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,520 ✭✭✭Tea 1000


    I mailed that guy Stewart about 2 months ago enquiring if they're still going ahead but got no reply. I hope it does go ahead, I'll be booking a ticket the minute they're in service! Taking off from Foynes in a Seaplane would be an excellent experience!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,941 ✭✭✭pclancy


    Excellent idea and great for local tourism and business etc. The environmental impact statement is interesting reading.

    I do find the noise pollution part very vague though.

    Noise Pollution
    Seaplanes have a relatively low impact on noise pollution. The majority of noise is
    generated during take off when high engine power is required to make the seaplane
    airborne.

    Table 1 outlines typical noise levels for various operations at typical distances from the
    sound source.

    Source of Noise dBA Note

    Jet ski 110 e.g. watersports on lake
    Chainsaw 100-104 e.g. tree felling
    Lawn mower 88-94 e.g. golf course
    Tractor 95 e.g. general operations
    Speedboat 65-95 e.g. watersports on lake
    Seaplane 75 Take off only @300m from plane for 20 sec
    Inside Car @ 30mph 68-73
    Normal Conversation 55-65

    Table 1 above highlights that the taking off of seaplanes does not have a significant
    affect on noise pollution when compared to typical existing noise sources at the lake. It
    must be noted that the value for the seaplane in Table 1 is representative of the plane
    taking off. During take off the power required to make the plane airborne is higher than
    cruising, taxiing or landing powers, therefore the noises generated are higher. This
    sound is generated for a short period of time only (approximately 20 seconds).
    As seaplane movements are limited to daylight hours, noise pollution at night will be non
    existent.


    I would argue that Seaplanes DO cause a lot of noise to the local area on takeoff AND on landing and certainly the Cessna 208 i've watched takeoff several times from Lake Taupo in NZ was way louder then any jetski on the lake at the same time...I find it hard for them to generalise all floatplanes into one noise level as well. Surely different engine types are going to propduce different volumes of noise depending on weather conditions etc. Saying "Seaplane 70db for 20 seconds" just seems very vague, I wonder did they actually test the same model of aircraft they're going to use? I would say based on my own experience of watching floatplane operations that the noise level doesnt die off after 20 seconds either, its more like 2-5 minutes before its actually climbed out of earshot for any single-engine type i've ever seen.

    I'm not in any way saying their statements are wrong or the service will cause masses of noise pollution, I just think they're being very vague. A couple of flights a day within working hours arent going to annoy anyone too much but 75db seems very conservative.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,520 ✭✭✭Tea 1000


    Maybe they were estimating based on the distance from shore they will be taking off from. Foynes "runway" for want of a better word(!) and Galway bay would both be a nice distance away from shore.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 167 ✭✭airvan


    Noise varies quite a lot depending on engine/propellor combination. A two blader running at 2700 RPM can vibrate your brain. But a three blader on the same engine would be considerably lower. A twin turbine as found on a Twotter would be different again. But as tea says they should be far enough offshore to avoid to much annoyance. Here's the plan for the proposed pier and take off area in Galway bay. That's far enough out unless you're on Hare Island or Mutton Island. It's interesting to see.

    http://www.galwaycity.ie/AllServices/Planning/Publications/PreDraftDevelopmentPlanSubmissions/TheFile,5788,en.pdf


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,941 ✭✭✭pclancy


    Interesting. I've only been standing on the shoreline or in a nearby building when i've heard the Cessnas takeoff. If its away from people yep it would be a lot less.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,370 ✭✭✭b757


    Has anyone heard anything relating to this lately? Is it still planned to go ahead?

    http://www.harbourflights.com/


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 104 ✭✭asdfg!


    Frankly it's never going to happen. Overtaken by events. Harbour Air was always a fantasy driven by non aviation dreamers. The person who they asked to help told them upfront it would never work.

    He was right. Nobody is going to fund that fantasy.

    That isn't to say a seaplane operation can't work. But the wrong people were trying to get it going.

    Meanwhile the AOC they wanted is still on the cards. Oddly enough they were right on one level.

    But Harbour Air is dead in the water, sunk to the gunwales. submerged in bureaucracy, waterlogged and all the other clichés.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 213 ✭✭A319er


    Well we did get an airshow in mountshannon last year but no sign of the float plane
    Of late pity but it was a mad idea from the start but who knows.

    If only the data were involved?
    Good money spent on pontoons and infrastructure in the harbour


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 15,790 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tabnabs


    A319er wrote: »
    If only the data were involved?
    Good money spent on pontoons and infrastructure in the harbour

    Which harbour, out of interest?

    I did see a single engine float plane over Dublin Bay last week during the QM2 cruise ship visit. Is their aircraft stored in the Dublin area?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 213 ✭✭A319er


    Mountshannon harbour sorry should have been more specific


    All quiet at HQ today


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,323 ✭✭✭phonypony


    Tabnabs wrote: »
    Which harbour, out of interest?

    I did see a single engine float plane over Dublin Bay last week during the QM2 cruise ship visit. Is their aircraft stored in the Dublin area?

    That was NFC's Cessna 172 EI-CFP based at Weston


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 104 ✭✭asdfg!


    phonypony wrote: »
    That was NFC's Cessna 172 EI-CFP based at Weston
    Yes they were using that to prove the concept at Mountshannon. Also the NFC is the only place in the Republic where you can get a floatplane rating that I'm aware of.

    But the 172 wouldn't be practical for what Harbour Air needed. It would have to be at least a six seater or better. I very much doubt if the money is available for that. Which is probably why the whole idea is dead in the water.......


Advertisement