Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Miramax closes down

Comments

  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 30,114 CMod ✭✭✭✭johnny_ultimate


    While I think Miramax did a lot in the early 90s for independent cinema (it helped to get smaller, alternative films to the mainstream) I actually kind of sighed everytime I saw the logo in later years - a lot of the time their focus seemed to be on Oscar bait (dull period dramas with good acting were their specialties, especially when Anthony Minghella was the director). And with the two quirky brothers having departed, it certainly couldn't have been considered the old Miramax anymore.

    Peter Biskind's cynical, gossipy tome Down & Dirty Pictures is certainly worth a read - an interesting, OTT account of a strange company.

    Edit: interesting list of Miramax films here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_films_released_by_Miramax_Films. They did seem to champion quite a few good imports in later years (Diving Bell and the Butterfly, the Hoax etc...) though there are very few major hits over the last few years, despite some excellent productions (No Country, There Will Be Blood, Adventureland, City of Men, Gone Baby Gone to name a few) :( I'd say Kill Bill would've been their last major financial success... (although seems No Country for Old Men raked in quite a bit)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 88,972 ✭✭✭✭mike65


    Companies like Disney have little interest in niche/art cinema in truth. They like the idea of owning these companies, the glitter rubs off for a while but then it fades and they loose interest, its just another column on the corporate balance sheet. If the hits stop coming they show no mercy.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,091 ✭✭✭✭bnt


    Latest: Disney Has "Over 10 Bidders" For Miramax . Also: the Weinsteins apparently want their old sandbox back. It ain't dead yet.

    You are the type of what the age is searching for, and what it is afraid it has found. I am so glad that you have never done anything, never carved a statue, or painted a picture, or produced anything outside of yourself! Life has been your art. You have set yourself to music. Your days are your sonnets.

    ―Oscar Wilde predicting Social Media, in The Picture of Dorian Gray



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,057 ✭✭✭conorhal


    I'll seccond a reccomendation for Peter Biskind's 'Down & Dirty Pictures', it's a brilliant insight into the rise and fall of independent cinema in America and charts the dynastic rise of Miramax who's great strength lay it's ability to brilliantly market small indies as must see blockbusters. They are a curiously schitzophrenic company whose drive for commercial success crushed as many films as they championed and ultimatle created an over heated market for indies (a bit like our housing undustry) where the costs outstripped demand and precipitated a collapse.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,664 CMod ✭✭✭✭faceman


    Im not that suprised to be honest. Since entering the recession, we have seen the arty arms of studios releasing less films, with the almost-guaranteed return blockbuster movies being the focus.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement