Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Freedom of Information -Central Bank

  • 20-01-2010 5:27am
    #1
    digme
    Closed Accounts Posts: 4,584 ✭✭✭


    Freedom of Information

    The Central Bank & Financial Services Authority of Ireland is not a body for the purposes of the Freedom of Information Act, 1997.

    Why not?

    Here


Comments

  • #2
    nesf
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,644 ✭✭✭✭nesf


    Why should it be?


  • #3
    digme
    Closed Accounts Posts: 4,584 ✭✭✭digme


    Is it above the law?


  • #4
    Riskymove
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,900 ✭✭✭✭Riskymove


    digme wrote: »
    Is it above the law?

    they are plenty of organisations not covered by the FOI...it does not make them "above the law"

    I'd imagine the excuse will be along the lines of commercial sensitivities or something similar


  • #5
    Sleepy
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,473 ✭✭✭✭Sleepy


    nesf wrote: »
    Why should it be?
    The very fact that our taxes pay it's employees would render it such imho.

    Any information of a commercially sensitive nature might have justification for an exclusion for a period of 1 or 2 years but otherwise, I don't see an argument for the exclusion of any state / semi-state organisation from the FOI act.


  • #6
    Iwasfrozen
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,250 ✭✭✭✭Iwasfrozen


    Sleepy wrote: »
    The very fact that our taxes pay it's employees would render it such imho.

    Any information of a commercially sensitive nature might have justification for an exclusion for a period of 1 or 2 years but otherwise, I don't see an argument for the exclusion of any state / semi-state organisation from the FOI act.
    Should be but isn't. What's your point ?


  • Advertisement
  • #7
    P. Breathnach
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,089 ✭✭✭✭P. Breathnach


    Sleepy wrote: »
    The very fact that our taxes pay it's employees would render it such imho...

    On such reasoning, you should have access to my medical records.


Advertisement