nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

Morphine question

Delancey

What are the main differences between Morphine and DiaMorphine ?

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

RobFowl

delancey42 wrote: »

What are the main differences between Morphine and DiaMorphine ?

Diamorphine is stronger (approc 1.5-2 times stronger) but is not licenced for use in the ROI.
It's licenced in the UK, New Zealand and possibly Canada but I'm not sure about the last one.
Diamorphine is effectively pure heroin.
It has benefits in some situations as it is more soluble than morphine so at higher doses e'g' in advance terminal care it has advantages.
It also has more side effects particularly mood lowering effects.

This applies to their use as painkillers, there are other uses for diamorphine as an alternative to methadone and also as cough supressants and various other.

There is alot of research but some of it is quite old and due to the licencing is usually limited to the UK.

SomeDose

In chemical terms, diamorphine is the diacetylated ester of morphine. The practical significance of this is that it easily crosses the blood-brain barrier to produce it's much-abused euphoric effect. This euphoric effect also has a justified clinical benefit since it can be very effective in relieving patient anxiety in severe trauma situations, heart attacks and terminal illness.

Apart from the obvious analgesic and anti-anxiety effects, its use in heart attacks, acute heart failure and pulmonary oedema stems from its peripheral vasodilatory action which reduces myocardial oxygen demand and offloads the failing heart by reducing cardiac pre-load. Morphine will also achieve the same effect.

In terms of common-or-garden analgesia or post-operative pain control, there is little to justify the use of diamorph over morphine. It produces the same analgesic effect at roughly half the dose of morphine but this is of no relevance in such scenarios. There are still a few maverick anaesthetists who claim diamorphine is a "better" painkiller but I imagine the evidence is probably outdated if not non-existent. As a pure analgesic only, we tend to use it occassionally for patients in sickle-cell crises who are either morphine-intolerant or have not responded to morphine or fentanyl previously.

Delancey

Many thanks for the interesting and detailed replies.