Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Will those who tuned in to see Bret keep watching?

  • 05-01-2010 4:48am
    #1
    Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 22,933 Mod ✭✭✭✭


    So Jan 4th is over, Bret has returned and with him came a lot of old WWF fans who wanted to see the Hitman go face to face with Vince/HBK again. But will any of those fans stay for a sustained period? How about even on boards where we have seen a lot of old and unusual faces posting on PW recently, are many of you going to hang around for a while?

    WWE have Tyson next week which is smart imo as he will def keep many peoples interest and if they watch next week they might also get Bret part 2 where it could be revealed that Bret is back for more than just a night or two.


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 175 ✭✭mitchmeister


    DEFO watchin raw next week

    RAW WAS BRET!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,542 ✭✭✭glenjamin


    Meh, maybe I will, maybe I won't. I was all looking forward to seeing Bret's comeback tonight but was left thinking at 4.10am 'why the fcuk didn't I go to bed?'. Apart from the last minute on it I was largely disappointed. I dunno what I was expecting but I did expect something other than a kick to the leg. I know Bret's gonna be around for a few months and was hoping that he would be the last guest host so they can ultimately focus on a McMahon/Bret feud without having to worry about trying to pop whoever they get to host each week. I'm sure it'll get better but for now I reckon I'll just be checking wrestling websites for a review come Tuesday afternoons.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 686 ✭✭✭Rud3Bwoy


    i will,seeing as i am going to mania,i love to watch the build up every week going into mania.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,426 ✭✭✭Roar


    i'll sky plus it, and skim through it after work on tuesday evenings i'd say


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,289 ✭✭✭parker kent


    One of the biggest downsides for me is that we have to pay for PPVs now. Back when I watched religiously, they were always free. I kind of faded away bit by bit over the past 2-3 years watching Impact mainly and eventually giving up on it too. Not being able afford the PPVs at the minute means that it feels a little pointless watching Raw or Smackdown.

    At the minute though I really want to see whats going to happen with Bret and then the possible HBK/Undertaker match too at Wrestlemania. So as of now it looks like I'll stick around till Mania. Sky+ Raw/Smackdown and watch Wrestlemania.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,082 ✭✭✭✭chopperbyrne


    Getting Tyson for next week is a very smart decision. People who hadn't watched wrestling since Bret left were watching last night and those people will all be very familiar with Tyson.

    Expect the Tyson/Austin/Shawn stuff to be shown.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,600 ✭✭✭✭CMpunked


    Im not really bothered TBH.

    I'll sky plus it but if i hear something major happens then i'll probably watch it.


  • Posts: 3,518 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    CMpunked wrote: »
    Im not really bothered TBH.

    I'll sky plus it but if i hear something major happens then i'll probably watch it.

    Exactly what I'l do tbh. Hoping to see DX K.o'ed by the Hart Dynasty now.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,720 ✭✭✭Sid_Justice


    I don't think I've ever seen Monday Night Raw before but I skimmed through last nights episode. Thought it was a bit silly until the very end when I realised it was completely ridiculous. I'll tune in next week to see how much of a train wreck Tyson is.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,600 ✭✭✭✭CMpunked


    Can't believe they actually billed him as 'iron mike' thought it'd be 'star of the hangover....'
    :rolleyes:


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,535 ✭✭✭joe123


    Will Bret be on next weeks show? Id watch it if it was but dont want to watch Mike Tyson and the whole sillyness that is wrestling anymore.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,491 ✭✭✭✭citytillidie


    I think Teddy Long will "sign" Bret to Smackdown, since he is still on his probation period and after Bret interaction with Jericho and Jerichos interaction a couple of weeks ago with the Hart family

    ******



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 15,238 ✭✭✭✭Diabhal Beag


    I want to see what happens next week but am not arsed to stay up till half 4 in the morning to find out.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 97 ✭✭DinnyBatman


    i'll watch the best bits on the internet the day after.
    bret has got me interested again (kind of..)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,600 ✭✭✭✭CMpunked


    I think Teddy Long will "sign" Bret to Smackdown, since he is still on his probation period and after Bret interaction with Jericho and Jerichos interaction a couple of weeks ago with the Hart family

    Co-GM perhaps?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,061 ✭✭✭✭Terry


    Right, what ChopperByrne said is, in my opinion, valid.

    The Austin Era people would have watched last night.

    So Bret hosted RAW. Where do we go from here?
    I don't want to see a convicted rapist host RAW. That's a really bad move on the part of Vince.
    They boast about having better ratings than network tv in the U.S., but I'm really uncomfortable about the WWE aligning itself with someone who served time for rape. I really don't see anything positive about this.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mike_Tyson#Rape_conviction.2C_prison.2C_and_aftermath


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 21,235 ✭✭✭✭flahavaj


    Terry wrote: »
    Right, what ChopperByrne said is, in my opinion, valid.

    The Austin Era people would have watched last night.

    So Bret hosted RAW. Where do we go from here?
    I don't want to see a convicted rapist host RAW. That's a really bad move on the part of Vince.
    They boast about having better ratings than network tv in the U.S., but I'm really uncomfortable about the WWE aligning itself with someone who served time for rape. I really don't see anything positive about this.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mike_Tyson#Rape_conviction.2C_prison.2C_and_aftermath

    Were you offended when he had his cameo in the hangover?

    Wrestling has few or no morals, especially Vince McMahon, its probably the scummiest industry in the world.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,196 ✭✭✭Ridley


    Terry wrote: »
    Right, what ChopperByrne said is, in my opinion, valid.

    The Austin Era people would have watched last night.

    So Bret hosted RAW. Where do we go from here?
    I don't want to see a convicted rapist host RAW. That's a really bad move on the part of Vince.
    They boast about having better ratings than network tv in the U.S., but I'm really uncomfortable about the WWE aligning itself with someone who served time for rape. I really don't see anything positive about this.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mike_Tyson#Rape_conviction.2C_prison.2C_and_aftermath

    Aligning Themselves again, surely? WrestleMania XIV happened, with success, so the best case you could make is that Tyson's appearance in the TV-PG era is what's suspect.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,315 ✭✭✭Jazzy


    dunno, probably not. there is a lot of sh1t wrestlers there. ill write a big post tomorow about it


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16 GarTss


    watched raw last night and although I was slightly let down by Brets appearance you couldn't help but feel you had to see him return , I'm pretty sure thats how it was for most people, there's talk on him and Vince at mania , hmmmm interesting;)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,193 ✭✭✭Wompa1


    GarTss wrote: »
    watched raw last night and although I was slightly let down by Brets appearance you couldn't help but feel you had to see him return , I'm pretty sure thats how it was for most people, there's talk on him and Vince at mania , hmmmm interesting;)

    Not sure Monday night was worth his selling himself out in fairness...I didn't like how he said he had begged to come back..that's horse crap. It made him seem weak. Neither Vince or HBK apologised yet Bret was willing to bury the hatchet...why would he agree to let himself seem like such a walk over!?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 53,262 ✭✭✭✭GavRedKing


    It was good to see him back but at abut 4.15 I though to myself I should have just Sky + it. I will be from now on, working at 9 the next day is not fun with feck all sleep.

    Still, ill just record it and see how it plays out.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 28,128 ✭✭✭✭Mossy Monk


    I wont watch again. I just wasn't entertained by any of it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 348 ✭✭bret69


    I didn't think the overall Raw was good at all but I'll continue watching as long as Bret is on there.

    REALLY didn't like the whole "I was trying to come back before but Vince didn't let me" thing...

    Why did he say that? Is it true I wonder?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16 GarTss


    I kinda consider it like a U2 album , even though they've brought out albums which weren't good , people will still say it was amazing just because they love u2, kinda the same thing with Bret for me anyway


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,505 ✭✭✭nevaeh-2die-4


    Just seen it there.
    It’s been a good while since I watched wwe

    so happy to Bret is back, I hope something really good develops from his appearance on raw, I know with his health issues he has considerable limitations to what he can do ring wise, I hope to see something good transpire for wrestlemania.

    I will watch raw for as long as bret`s there


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,339 ✭✭✭me-skywalker


    Havnt watched wrestlign in about 2 years. The draw for Bret was immense so obviously I watched it.... but I wont be watching it again!! Terrible terrible programming now.

    Ads every 5mins.. ads during matches... barely any matches at all. Too many segments. and some baad segments.

    Il just havea read online to see what they do with Bret but coudlnt be arsed even then. Its done with now they've obviously kissed and made up to make a rake load of money.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,196 ✭✭✭Ridley


    bret69 wrote: »
    REALLY didn't like the whole "I was trying to come back before but Vince didn't let me" thing...

    Why did he say that? Is it true I wonder?

    To give McMahon boos.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,193 ✭✭✭Wompa1


    Ridley wrote: »
    To give McMahon boos.

    He could have said something else like he wanted his father inducted into the HOF with him or some crap like that...then have Vince say he'd induct him this year and still get the same boo's and then slight cheers. What they did made no sense...it made Bret seem desperate and weak


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,061 ✭✭✭✭Terry


    flahavaj wrote: »
    Were you offended when he had his cameo in the hangover?

    Wrestling has few or no morals, especially Vince McMahon, its probably the scummiest industry in the world.
    My problem is that Tyson is a convicted rapist.
    Yes, wrestling organisations are known for their moral ambiguity, but that is mostly to do with performers taking steroids,
    Steroid abuse is self harm. Rape is, well, I've never been raped but I can only imagine that it is a horrific experience for the victim.

    As for the film "The Hangover", I watched about half and was offended by the complete lack of humour in it.

    GarTss wrote: »
    I kinda consider it like a U2 album , even though they've brought out albums which weren't good , people will still say it was amazing just because they love u2, kinda the same thing with Bret for me anyway

    As a U2 fan, I'll disagree with that. Their last two albums were not great at all. I've been a U2 fan since 1983. I rarely liked any of their singles, but I love the other album tracks.


    Anyway, to bring this back on topic; Bret as GM?
    The guest manager thing will not last forever. Corporate wants a new GM. Bret gets the gig (this is hypothetical and has no basis in fact).


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16 GarTss


    personally I dont think he will become GM, I think he just wants to bow out of wrestling with his head up high and doesn't want his career spoilt by what took place in montreal , and as for the U2 thing, I find them ****, but try explain why to any of their fans


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 21,235 ✭✭✭✭flahavaj


    Terry wrote: »
    My problem is that Tyson is a convicted rapist.
    Yes, wrestling organisations are known for their moral ambiguity, but that is mostly to do with performers taking steroids,
    Steroid abuse is self harm. Rape is, well, I've never been raped but I can only imagine that it is a horrific experience for the victim.

    As for the film "The Hangover", I watched about half and was offended by the complete lack of humour in it.

    Of course rape is horrendous, I wasn't trying to belittle it in any way.

    But I'm a bit surprised about any moral indignation about Tyson. He featured in the Main Event of Wrestlemania after his rape conviction as well, this is nothing new.

    Also whether you enjoyed the Hangover is irrelevant and skirting around the issue. Were you morally outraged to see Tyson in it?

    And the moral ambiguity prevalent in wrestling stretches much further than mere steroid abuse. Women are demeaned on a weekly basis on WWE TV, Hulk Hogna has been taped colluding with his son about how to use his imprisonment for causing a serious car crash to further his showbiz career, WWE have performers while pregnant, made a storlyline several times about female employees putting on weight, Japanese wrestler Kensuke Sasaki is accused of beating a young wrestler in the New Japan dojo, theres teh Montreal screwjob, the animal abuse scandal in dragon gate, the Jimmy Snuka murder story:I literally could go on all night. Point is, wrestling is pretty scummy. If you were to look at it in a moralistic light you'd never watch again and thow all your wrestling DVD's in the bin. Employing a rapist is just another thing to add to the list to be perfectly honest.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,061 ✭✭✭✭Terry


    GarTss wrote: »
    personally I dont think he will become GM, I think he just wants to bow out of wrestling with his head up high and doesn't want his career spoilt by what took place in montreal , and as for the U2 thing, I find them ****, but try explain why to any of their fans
    Musical taste is subjective.
    As fr the GM thing, that's just something I see happening, It may not happen. I'm justspeculating.

    flahavaj wrote: »
    Of course rape is horrendous, I wasn't trying to belittle it in any way.

    But I'm a bit surprised about any moral indignation about Tyson. He featured in the Main Event of Wrestlemania after his rape conviction as well, this is nothing new.

    Also whether you enjoyed the Hangover is irrelevant and skirting around the issue. Were you morally outraged to see Tyson in it?

    And the moral ambiguity prevalent in wrestling stretches much further than mere steroid abuse. Women are demeaned on a weekly basis on WWE TV, Hulk Hogna has been taped colluding with his son about how to use his imprisonment for causing a serious car crash to further his showbiz career, WWE have performers while pregnant, made a storlyline several times about female employees putting on weight, Japanese wrestler Kensuke Sasaki is accused of beating a young wrestler in the New Japan dojo, theres teh Montreal screwjob, the animal abuse scandal in dragon gate, the Jimmy Snuka murder story:I literally could go on all night. Point is, wrestling is pretty scummy. If you were to look at it in a moralistic light you'd never watch again and thow all your wrestling DVD's in the bin. Employing a rapist is just another thing to add to the list to be perfectly honest.

    I didn't say you were belittling rape.
    I didn't watch the Raws and PPVs with Tyson because he is a convicted rapist.

    Yes, Hogan is a jackass. Watching half an episode of "Hogan pimps himself to MTV" makes that clear.

    I watch WWE and that's about it.
    Can you point out any rapists of murderers currently employed by them?

    The other PW mods would be bigger fans that I am. I tend not to follow Japanese, Mexican and whatever shows.

    I was watching TNA until they tried the WCW thing without making it interesting.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 21,235 ✭✭✭✭flahavaj


    Terry wrote: »
    Musical taste is subjective.
    As fr the GM thing, that's just something I see happening, It may not happen. I'm justspeculating.




    I didn't say you were belittling rape.
    I didn't watch the Raws and PPVs with Tyson because he is a convicted rapist.

    Yes, Hogan is a jackass. Watching half an episode of "Hogan pimps himself to MTV" makes that clear.

    I watch WWE and that's about it.
    Can you point out any rapists of murderers currently employed by them?

    The other PW mods would be bigger fans that I am. I tend not to follow Japanese, Mexican and whatever shows.

    I was watching TNA until they tried the WCW thing without making it interesting.

    No murderers or rapists at present AFAIK, jimmy Snuka is alleged to have gotten away with murder (literally), I suppose there's the role the WWE schedule played in Benoit's mental and physical state and Sasaki was employed by WCW in the past.

    I'm just merely making the point that the wrestling business as a whole is a moralistic minefield and it would be hard to know where to draw the line if you were to look at it in that way in too much detail. You choose to draw the line at Tyson and fair play to you for sticking to your guns both now and back in 1998, you're a better man than me!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 40 Noelisgod


    Havnt watched wrestlign in about 2 years. The draw for Bret was immense so obviously I watched it.... but I wont be watching it again!! Terrible terrible programming now.

    Ads every 5mins.. ads during matches... barely any matches at all. Too many segments. and some baad segments.

    Il just havea read online to see what they do with Bret but coudlnt be arsed even then. Its done with now they've obviously kissed and made up to make a rake load of money.
    i agree the situation with the ads is nuts they are non stop _ normal ads live event
    ads health and safety ads constant replays of previous week where is the wrestling ffs


  • Advertisement
Advertisement