Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Nicked fifty times... aged 11

  • 01-01-2010 7:48am
    #1
    Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators, Help & Feedback Category Moderators Posts: 9,812 CMod ✭✭✭✭


    The Sun today reports an all-too-common story that plagues towns and cities across Ireland and the UK: Juvenile delinquency.

    In the case The Sun writes of, an 11 year old boy has clocked up 17 convictions in 2 years. He has been arrested over 50 times. He lives in an 'open door' children's home.

    The harm and misery this little person has inflicted on society is equal to that of an adult, but the current Criminal Justice System is extremely limited in what is can do with a person this young.

    From my point of view there seem to be some value in sending kids like this to a Brat Camp of sorts. What they don't learn in their formative years they'll have to learn at some point in their development, or they will continue to wreck people's lives as they become older and criminality becomes part of their identity. The amount of police time that has been effectively wasted on 1 person, not to mention court time and legal fees, has to be staggering.

    If, at an early stage, there was the threat of a tiered boot camp structure looming over his head, one wonders if he would have continued to offend.

    What Criminal Justice System changes would you like to see where a child (who is effectively parentless) is involved in incessant criminality?


Comments

  • Legal Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 5,400 Mod ✭✭✭✭Maximilian


    A brat camp approach sounds like a good idea. Can't say I think traditional methods of punishment/deterrence works with children.

    I have no idea how out justice system deals with these cases to be honest.

    What tends to happen?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,058 ✭✭✭Gurgle


    Maximilian wrote: »
    I have no idea how out justice system deals with these cases to be honest.

    What tends to happen?
    They don't deal with them at all - its just round and round from street to home to court until they either kill someone, get themselves killed, or turn 18 and hit their 1,000,000th conviction.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,194 ✭✭✭Trojan911


    The Brat Camp seems a good start even if it puts a minority percentage of habitual offenders back on the straight and narrow.

    However, we have to accept that there is an element of society in every country, city or town that has absolutely no respect for law & order or their fellow human beings.

    It will not be eradicated but will continue to be controlled by means of cautioning, fines or imprisonment.

    Every generation blames the one before.


  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 14,561 Mod ✭✭✭✭johnnyskeleton


    psni wrote: »
    The Sun today reports an all-too-common story that plagues towns and cities across Ireland and the UK: Juvenile delinquency.

    In the case The Sun writes of, an 11 year old boy has clocked up 17 convictions in 2 years. He has been arrested over 50 times. He lives in an 'open door' children's home.

    The harm and misery this little person has inflicted on society is equal to that of an adult, but the current Criminal Justice System is extremely limited in what is can do with a person this young.

    From my point of view there seem to be some value in sending kids like this to a Brat Camp of sorts. What they don't learn in their formative years they'll have to learn at some point in their development, or they will continue to wreck people's lives as they become older and criminality becomes part of their identity. The amount of police time that has been effectively wasted on 1 person, not to mention court time and legal fees, has to be staggering.

    If, at an early stage, there was the threat of a tiered boot camp structure looming over his head, one wonders if he would have continued to offend.

    What Criminal Justice System changes would you like to see where a child (who is effectively parentless) is involved in incessant criminality?

    Well for a start you'd have to change the law as regards the age of criminal responsibility, because such a child in the RoI wouldn't have any convictions.

    http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/2001/en/act/pub/0024/sec0052.html#partv-sec52


  • Legal Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 4,338 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tom Young


    In the Criminal Law, the Criminal Justice Act 2006 effectively abolished the maxim or expression Doli Incapax. Making minors liable for serious offences between the ages of 10 and 12 years.

    The definition of a minor is generally someone under the age of 18 years in Ireland for all other contexts.

    Thus amending:
    The Children Act (as amended by the Criminal Justice Act 2006)
    Section 52 (as amended) states:

    (1) Subject to subsection (2), a child under
    12 years of age shall not be charged with an
    offence.

    (2) Subsection (1) does not apply to a child
    aged 10 or 11 years who is charged with murder,
    manslaughter, rape, rape under section 4 of the
    Criminal Law (Rape) (Amendment) Act 1990 or
    aggravated sexual assault.

    (3) The rebuttable presumption under any rule
    of law, namely, that a child who is not less than 7
    but under 14 years of age is incapable of committing
    an offence because the child did not have the
    capacity to know that the act or omission concerned
    was wrong, is abolished.

    (4) Where a child under 14 years of age is
    charged with an offence, no further proceedings in
    the matter (other than any remand in custody or
    on bail) shall be taken except by or with the consent
    of the Director of Public Prosecutions”.


    Section 76C of the Children Act 2001 states:
    Where a child under 14 years of age is
    charged with an offence, the Court may, of its own
    motion or the application of any person, dismiss
    the case on its merits if, having had due regard to
    the child’s age and level of maturity, it determines
    that the child did not have a full understanding of
    what was involved in the commission of the offence.”.

    I am not contradicting JS, but adding the above for clarity. The 2006 Act modified the concept of Doli Incapax, in-fact some say abolished it in part, save for the mere presumption.

    Tom


  • Advertisement
  • Legal Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 4,338 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tom Young


    I think the 2006 Act also brings in ASBOS, but I have heard from colleagues that these are about as useful as a chocolate teapot.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,644 ✭✭✭✭nesf


    I've never really got this whole diminished responsibility thing for "minors". If they can plan out and enact a complicated crime themselves (i.e. are not merely doing a bit of legwork for older criminals) then they are old enough to be punished for doing it.


Advertisement