Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Maths Higher 2001 Paper 1 Q6 part c (different solution)

  • 15-12-2009 7:12pm
    #1
    eoins2345
    Closed Accounts Posts: 154 ✭✭


    I did the log of both sides for x before getting x(2/t +1) for dx/dt but didnt didnt get the log of both of sides for y and got (1+2/t) for dy/dt.After cancellation i was left with the desired 1/x.Can u use this method even though it wasnt in the marking scheme?


Comments

  • #2
    caroline1111
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 224 ✭✭caroline1111


    what year?


  • #3
    eoins2345
    Closed Accounts Posts: 154 ✭✭eoins2345


    sorry its 2001!


  • #4
    MathsManiac
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,595 ✭✭✭MathsManiac


    eoins2345 wrote: »
    I did the log of both sides for x before getting x(2/t +1) for dx/dt but didnt didnt get the log of both of sides for y and got (1+2/t) for dy/dt.After cancellation i was left with the desired 1/x.Can u use this method even though it wasnt in the marking scheme?

    Yes.

    (Look at one of the recent marking schemes, and see point 7 under the "general directions to examiners".)


Advertisement