Tiger Woods' Marraige - A Daming Indicment Of Heterosexual Marraige

Donnaghm

Based on this one example of a dysfunction heterosexual relationship during which Tiger Woods had sexual intercourse with many mistresses including a porn star, I believe that the final nail has been put in the coffin of the "happily ever after" conventional perception of heterosexual unions and therefore, they should not be recognised legally and heterosexual people shouldn't be left anywhere near children.

Jan Moir of the Daily Mail.

Reginald P. DuM

Oh well if Jan Moir said then it must be reasonable, balanced and whats the word......... oh yeah clever. :rolleyes:

Jan Moir is gross.. First time poster here, just could not resist when I read who was involved.

Donnaghm

Just highlighting the fact that the public perception of gay relationships is that they are unstable and destined to not last. After the gately affair, people were making all these generalising comments and questioning whether or not we should introduce civil unions. No sweeping statements after this incident however.

KeyLimePie

...........she's only saying that cause she screwed up with Stephan Gately.

Having that said I think that Tiger Wood's affairs can't be used in a case for gay marriage.....

Aoifums

I was very confused as to how anyone could think this until I realised Jan Moir had wrote this.
I've given up trying to figure out how her mind works :rolleyes:

boredboard

I understand your original post OP and I am smiling (for a few different reasons)...

Padman

Donnaghm wrote: »

Based on this one example of a dysfunction heterosexual relationship during which Tiger Woods had sexual intercourse with many mistresses including a porn star, I believe that the final nail has been put in the coffin of the "happily ever after" conventional perception of heterosexual unions and therefore, they should not be recognised legally and heterosexual people shouldn't be left anywhere near children.

Jan Moir of the Daily Mail.

Sorry but thats complete nonsense.If we were basing a whole type of sexuality by one marriage why dont we base all gay men by saying the are all feminine cross dressers who definitely wouldnt be able to raise a child and defend it?

It works both ways.

My parents are happily ever after,my friends parents are.Your telling me this couldnt happen in a gay relationship?

Complete and utter bull plop.

ceegee

Seems a lot of people need to readjust their sarcasmeters......

Donnaghm

ceegee wrote: »

Seems a lot of people need to readjust their sarcasmeters......

Ya, or get a brain. haha.

Tricity Bendix

Aren't jokes supposed to be funny?

stephen_n

Does anyone with an IQ over double figures read the Daily Mail?

bryaner

Padman wrote: »

Sorry but thats complete nonsense.If we were basing a whole type of sexuality by one marriage why dont we base all gay men by saying the are all feminine cross dressers who definitely wouldnt be able to raise a child and defend it?

It works both ways.

My parents are happily ever after,my friends parents are.Your telling me this couldnt happen in a gay relationship?

Complete and utter bull plop.

Hear hear padman well said

bryaner

There's far more infidelity in gay relationships

FACT

L1011

bryaner wrote: »

There's far more infidelity in gay relationships

FACT

Proof? Oh yes, you've got none.

You also have no ability to detect sarcasm, just like Padman who you agreed with.

Whats worrying is you probably thought "that's told them" after posting...

bryaner

Ohh i know and have the facts, gay couples per head of capita

have more affairs than heterosexuals ! Sorry if this hurts you as

the truth often does. And as for "thats told them" lmfao if you

think your that important well good for you.

jaffa20

bryaner wrote: »

Ohh i know and have the facts, gay couples per head of capita

have more affairs than heterosexuals ! Sorry if this hurts you as

the truth often does. And as for "thats told them" lmfao if you

think your that important well good for you.

bryaner wrote: »

There's far more infidelity in gay relationships

FACT

Gay relationships Vs Straight marriage and perhaps that highlights a problem without how gay people aren't allowed to make the same commitment as straight people in this country. However, there is no FACT as you have no idea how many people are in a gay relationships or straight for that fact and who has cheated.

L1011

bryaner wrote: »

Ohh i know and have the facts, gay couples per head of capita

have more affairs than heterosexuals ! Sorry if this hurts you as

the truth often does. And as for "thats told them" lmfao if you

think your that important well good for you.

You "know and have the facts", yet provide absolutely none of them. Right so...

You have also *still* managed to fail to understand sarcasm at all.

bryaner

Lmfao don't care wont care get over yourself and do a bit of research

Sarcasm go easy im not reading any posts bar my own and padman's,

calm down i feel your pain.

L1011

bryaner wrote: »

Lmfao don't care wont care get over yourself and do a bit of research

Sarcasm go easy im not reading any posts bar my own and padman's,

calm down i feel your pain.

Translation:

"I don't have any evidence. I've now just realised the first post was sarcastic, but its taken a long time, so I'm going to slink off embarrassed at making a fool of myself"

bryaner

MYOB wrote: »

Translation:

"I don't have any evidence. I've now just realised the first post was sarcastic, but its taken a long time, so I'm going to slink off embarrassed at making a fool of myself"

Ohh that really hurt me! Now i'm nearly carrying as much pain as you!!

mean person................................

Annasopra

The cavemen seem to have come out of hibernation

bryaner

MYOB wrote: »

Translation:

"I don't have any evidence. I've now just realised the first post was sarcastic, but its taken a long time, so I'm going to slink off embarrassed at making a fool of myself"

Still here btw

So who has slinked off? Typical!

L1011

Johnnymcg wrote: »

The cavemen seem to have come out of hibernation

Very much so.

Bob_Harris

I could have sworn I posted in this thread, otherwise why would I be subscribed?

Tricity Bendix

Stupid thread leads to plethora of stupid responses. Shocking.

Annasopra

Bob_Harris wrote: »

I could have sworn I posted in this thread, otherwise why would I be subscribed?

so could I some ****e about unnatural .............

Bob_Harris

unnatural, wrong and incompatible to be specific.

Tricity Bendix

surely this thread has served its purpose and can be locked?

Stark

You're locked.