Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

mass of solid bar

  • 29-11-2009 11:44pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,335 ✭✭✭


    not an engineer but thought someone here might be able to help i need to find the mass of a solid steel bar. diameter 80mm height/length 100mm
    if any further info is needed let me know because im not sure what info is needed to do the calculations

    cant just throm it on a scales, as the variables above will change


Comments

  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 23,243 Mod ✭✭✭✭godtabh


    Do you know its density?

    Its parameters should change if its solid


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,335 ✭✭✭newby.204


    no i dont know the density of the metal, cock thought i might need that alright


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 23,243 Mod ✭✭✭✭godtabh


    Best you can do is estimate it's weight. check google out


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,064 ✭✭✭Gurgle


    newby.204 wrote: »
    diameter 80mm height/length 100mm
    ...cant just throm it on a scales, as the variables above will change
    How will the height / length change ?

    Alright, google could have told you this: Density of plain mild steel is 7.85 g/cm3.

    Change the dimensions to cm, calculate the volume (Volume of a cylinder, I'm not going to do it all for you) multiply volume by density and you have the mass.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,335 ✭✭✭newby.204


    making collars, lengths(heights) will change as the weights of the collars vary... cheers lads


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,738 ✭✭✭mawk


    its about 15.75kg at 80*100

    but what do you mean you cant just weigh it as it changes the variables?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,064 ✭✭✭Gurgle


    newby.204 wrote: »
    making collars, lengths(heights) will change as the weights of the collars vary... cheers lads

    Ah, that explains...... well, nothing.

    What?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,638 ✭✭✭Turbulent Bill


    Gurgle wrote: »
    Ah, that explains...... well, nothing.

    What?

    I'll make a stab and say that the OP is trying to design 'weights' for a barbell or something similar. Therefore the size of the 'weight' is driven by the required mass, the material density and whatever geometry is constrained (the inner diameter of the 'collar', for example).

    Could be completely wrong though, who knows...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,335 ✭✭✭newby.204


    I'll make a stab and say that the OP is trying to design 'weights' for a barbell or something similar. Therefore the size of the 'weight' is driven by the required mass, the material density and whatever geometry is constrained (the inner diameter of the 'collar', for example).

    Could be completely wrong though, who knows...

    correct and right , micro plates to be exact, weighing 125g, 250g, 500g, 750g and 1kg!! the shaft they have fo fit on is 55mm and the largest diameter i can machine is 75mm, therefore they become collars as appose to plates with the length varying with the weight, however with the variance in densities between 7.715g/m3 and 8.05g/m3 its hard to be exact as they have to be within .05g+/- of the nominal weight


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,900 ✭✭✭✭Mellor


    Why don't you just weigh the piece of metal you will machine them from, and get it's exact density, it becomes quite easy then.

    Machine to with a few grams, and remove the last bit by hand, checking each piece as you approach its goal weight


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,335 ✭✭✭newby.204


    thats one way of doing it mellor but i have only so much metal on hand that is the required OD, and i dont want to waste it!!!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,738 ✭✭✭mawk


    you doing this in a shed type environment?

    im going to go out on an unconstructive limb here and say that you are quite simply NOT going to get it +/- .05g

    thats.. awfully precise. in fact, youre not going to get to between .05mm

    I make SUPER regulated medical devices for a living, and even they vary quite a bit. if youre not using a hideously well calibrated cnc mill... its not going to be close enough for your aims.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 314 ✭✭Gonzales


    newby.204 wrote: »
    correct and right , micro plates to be exact, weighing 125g, 250g, 500g, 750g and 1kg!! the shaft they have fo fit on is 55mm and the largest diameter i can machine is 75mm, therefore they become collars as appose to plates with the length varying with the weight, however with the variance in densities between 7.715g/m3 and 8.05g/m3 its hard to be exact as they have to be within .05g+/- of the nominal weight

    You could probably buy these standards weights off the ebay or from NSA Ireland. Save yourself a lot of headaches.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 314 ✭✭Gonzales


    Mellor wrote: »
    Why don't you just weigh the piece of metal you will machine them from, and get it's exact density, it becomes quite easy then.

    Machine to with a few grams, and remove the last bit by hand, checking each piece as you approach its goal weight

    Mellor is bang on there.

    Density = Mass/ volume

    Kg/Cubic meter = Mass of your bar / 0.0005024 cubic meters

    If you need to maintain the OD then you could fine tune the weight using a drill bit or file to remove metal from the flat surfaces.

    Next question : do you have a scale that is capable of these accuracies & calibrated?

    good luck with this, I've I funny feeling, that this has not helped at all at all.:)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,638 ✭✭✭Turbulent Bill


    newby.204 wrote: »
    correct and right , micro plates to be exact, weighing 125g, 250g, 500g, 750g and 1kg!! the shaft they have fo fit on is 55mm and the largest diameter i can machine is 75mm, therefore they become collars as appose to plates with the length varying with the weight, however with the variance in densities between 7.715g/m3 and 8.05g/m3 its hard to be exact as they have to be within .05g+/- of the nominal weight

    If you can't buy standard weights that will fit on the shaft (Gonzales' suggestion is good), then machining custom weights to this spec is going to be very difficult (if not impossible). Weight tolerances are usually given as a percentage of the nominal weight (e.g. 0.1% or 0.05%) rather than an absolute value as the manufacturing and measurement tolerances scale with weight. Find the weight range you will have to measure (e.g., 200-1700g) and the measurement accuracy of your scales in this range, then tailor the manufacturing tolerances to suit these.

    If the density variation is still a problem then I'd consider making semi-solid weights. Machine the weight to a lower mass than that required, and incorporate a 'pocket' in the design for holding lead shot, sand etc. That way you could gradually top-up the weight to bring it to the required mass.


Advertisement