Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Dutch Governmet is to tax cars by their movements.

  • 14-11-2009 12:29pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 20,009 ✭✭✭✭


    Dutch drivers are to pay less to buy a car but will be charged tax on every kilometre on the road in a move aimed at reducing traffic jams, fatal accidents and carbon emissions.

    GPS will track the time, hour and place each car moves and send the data to a billing agency.

    I don't know if such a system would work in this country, Everyone would be wrapping their GPS sensor up in lead to avoid paying the tax. :D

    http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5ggzUbQMWph8GplMdWzjDEnKD7ZJQD9BV89TG0


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 285 ✭✭sold


    Dutch drivers are to pay less to buy a car but will be charged tax on every kilometre on the road in a move aimed at reducing traffic jams, fatal accidents and carbon emissions.

    GPS will track the time, hour and place each car moves and send the data to a billing agency.

    I don't know if such a system wold work in this country, Everyone would be wrapping their GPS sensor up in lead to avoid paying the tax. :D

    http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5ggzUbQMWph8GplMdWzjDEnKD7ZJQD9BV89TG0


    Excellent Idea!!, I drive mine very little so would save me a lot on Road tax!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,009 ✭✭✭✭Run_to_da_hills


    sold wrote: »
    Excellent Idea!!, I drive mine very little so would save me a lot on Road tax!
    Me too. :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,789 ✭✭✭slavetothegrind


    Is it fup an excellent idea.
    It is a massive infringement on civil liberties!
    You don't think that kind of data on peoples movements would be worth a lot to someone?

    Next comes the autofines in the post because you strayed over the limit.

    Then even more detailed taxation because now we know where you are we can charge you for parking automatically, and fine you for the same, conjestion charges become a doddle to impose and what about the guy who works out of a van for a living?
    Are all his customers going to pay more to cover the extra cost to him?

    Bollox to this state getting that kind of control.

    Rant over......:o


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,815 ✭✭✭✭Anan1


    It'd be great news for anyone owning a large-engined second car.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,522 ✭✭✭✭colm_mcm


    Automated speeding fines too.

    Yummy.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,722 ✭✭✭maidhc


    There is a very simple way to tax people on car movements and also encourages smaller more fuel efficient cars and does not unduly discriminate against people who do not drive too often.

    It is called a tax on fuel,

    It has the added benefit of being easy to administer and isn't a technological quagmire that will cost millions in "consultants" and "agencies".


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 66,132 ✭✭✭✭unkel
    Chauffe, Marcel, chauffe!


    They've been talking about this for about 20 years now. The plan is now to be implented by 2012 but the current government is only in place till 2011. The skeptic in me says it won't happen this time either. Any form of taxation like this which is prone to errors and needs a huge administrative system in place is wrong imho. Just tax the bloody fuel!!!

    Edit - hah! maidhc beat me to it - good man :D


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 9,689 Mod ✭✭✭✭stevenmu


    While a fuel tax seems like a great idea to me, look at it from the governments point of view, you could have:

    An all inclusive fuel tax

    OR

    An importy tax on all vehicles (Vrt)
    A sales tax on all vehicles (vat)
    A vehicle ownership tax(motor tax)
    An insurance levy
    A road usage tax (tolls)
    A possible movement based tax (gps)
    AND
    Fuel tax

    I think I know which option our government is likely to go for :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,606 ✭✭✭Jumpy


    I already knew who wrote this before I even opened the thread.

    Makes it hard to take the thread seriously.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,009 ✭✭✭✭Run_to_da_hills


    Is it fup an excellent idea.
    It is a massive infringement on civil liberties!
    You don't think that kind of data on peoples movements would be worth a lot to someone?

    Next comes the autofines in the post because you strayed over the limit.

    Then even more detailed taxation because now we know where you are we can charge you for parking automatically, and fine you for the same, conjestion charges become a doddle to impose and what about the guy who works out of a van for a living?
    Are all his customers going to pay more to cover the extra cost to him?

    Bollox to this state getting that kind of control.

    Rant over......:o
    You can choose to take public transport, but there again, this will also have your movements tracked by registered smart card. Even the push bikes hired out by JC Decaux can be tracked to who uses them. If you walk the CCTV will track you. There will be no escape. :eek:


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 285 ✭✭sold


    Is it fup an excellent idea.
    It is a massive infringement on civil liberties!
    You don't think that kind of data on peoples movements would be worth a lot to someone?

    If you own a mobile phone you are already being tracked.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,009 ✭✭✭✭Run_to_da_hills


    sold wrote: »
    If you own a mobile phone you are already being tracked.

    Not if you keep it stored in a faraday cage. :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,035 ✭✭✭✭-Chris-


    Is it fup an excellent idea.
    It is a massive infringement on civil liberties!
    You don't think that kind of data on peoples movements would be worth a lot to someone?

    <rant>

    Rant over......:o

    a) if your mobile phone is turned on, "they" already know where you are.
    b) this is a run_to_the_hills thread. If you didn't put on a tinfoil hat before opening the thread, you haven't been paying attention... :p:D


    Edit: dammit, repeatedly beaten to it. Serves me right for watching The Office while writing my witty responses! :o


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 88 ✭✭Dark-Mavis


    Is it fup an excellent idea.
    It is a massive infringement on civil liberties!
    You don't think that kind of data on peoples movements would be worth a lot to someone?

    Next comes the autofines in the post because you strayed over the limit.

    Then even more detailed taxation because now we know where you are we can charge you for parking automatically, and fine you for the same, conjestion charges become a doddle to impose and what about the guy who works out of a van for a living?
    Are all his customers going to pay more to cover the extra cost to him?

    Bollox to this state getting that kind of control.

    Rant over......:o

    Yep within a few years of this going ahead cheaper insurance if your insurer can see all data, automatic speeding fines etc

    Kind of like what happened with cctv in England a few years ago a law was passed inorder to help prosecute vandals and the such, now used to fine people for parking on double yellow lines etc.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,789 ✭✭✭slavetothegrind


    The worst thing about thinking they are out to get ya is looking around and seeing the whites of their eyes!;)

    This country cannot even link revenue and social welfare systems, We have at least 5 seperate HSE systems. Does anyone really think they can implement this idea?

    Fuel tax is fairer and does away with any logistic mess. ( as said by above posters)

    Come back to me with your high faluten gps tracker systems when tax insurance and nct/doe are linked together and on-line.
    See you in 2020 or so....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,789 ✭✭✭slavetothegrind


    Dark-Mavis wrote: »
    Yep within a few years of this going ahead cheaper insurance if your insurer can see all data, automatic speeding fines etc

    .

    Really?

    So if the companies lose a fortune on their investments of our premiums we won't have to pay more to restore profitability?

    Insurance companies are like porn directors, you think you have seen it all and then they come up with ingenious and new ways of rodgering you.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,815 ✭✭✭✭Anan1


    Insurance companies are like porn directors, you think you have seen it all and then they come up with ingenious and new ways of rodgering you.
    :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,686 ✭✭✭JHMEG


    maidhc wrote: »
    There is a very simple way to tax people on car movements and also encourages smaller more fuel efficient cars and does not unduly discriminate against people who do not drive too often.

    It is called a tax on fuel,

    It has the added benefit of being easy to administer and isn't a technological quagmire that will cost millions in "consultants" and "agencies".

    You mean it doesn't come with a gravy train? Would never work here so...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71,188 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    If this means I'm not going to nearly miss a Channel Tunnel because of a half hour jam on the Ring Utrecht, I'm all for it... because its not like they're going to whap a tracker on an Irish registered car when you come across the border!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,009 ✭✭✭✭Run_to_da_hills


    MYOB wrote: »
    If this means I'm not going to nearly miss a Channel Tunnel because of a half hour jam on the Ring Utrecht, I'm all for it... because its not like they're going to whap a tracker on an Irish registered car when you come across the border!
    My guess is that these tracking devices will be your future European tax disk. They creep into the country under the guise of some state toll plaza or congestion charge electronic device. It will eventually become mandatory an inter-operable throughout the EU so if you scr*ew up in Utrecht you will automatically get a summons in Dublin..


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,575 ✭✭✭junkyard


    MYOB wrote: »
    If this means I'm not going to nearly miss a Channel Tunnel because of a half hour jam on the Ring Utrecht, I'm all for it... because its not like they're going to whap a tracker on an Irish registered car when you come across the border!

    We'll be tracked and fined for everything now from the EU thanks to our yes vote for Lisbon.


Advertisement