Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Fine Gael and NAMA WTF?

Comments

  • #2
    Mena
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,180 ✭✭✭Mena


    Plausible deniability...


  • #3
    eoinbn
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 843 ✭✭✭eoinbn


    It's just a worthless headline grabbing story.

    "However, Mr Kenny had agreed a Dail pairing in advance -- a gentleman's agreement that allows TDs and ministers miss a vote if a colleague from the opposition abstains."

    That's the important line.


  • #4
    Riskymove
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,900 ✭✭✭✭Riskymove


    eoinbn wrote: »
    That's the important line.

    I'd have thought the important line was the last one....that the Government "easily won the vote"

    it wouldn't have made any difference


  • #5
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭ [Deleted User]


    eoinbn wrote: »
    It's just a worthless headline grabbing story.

    "However, Mr Kenny had agreed a Dail pairing in advance -- a gentleman's agreement that allows TDs and ministers miss a vote if a colleague from the opposition abstains."

    That's the important line.

    http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/breaking/2008/0923/breaking59.htm
    I thought they abandoned pairing? ^^
    Stupid idea anyway


  • #6
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭ [Deleted User]


    Riskymove wrote: »
    I'd have thought the important line was the last one....that the Government "easily won the vote"

    it wouldn't have made any difference

    Thats one way of looking at it, the other way is that there failure to show up is a sign of a very unhealthy democracy. If these guys oppose NAMA why didnt they start with petitions? They are able to mobilise for elections and the recent referendum.

    A sign these guys are part of the problem to me. Seems we dont just need rid of Fianna Fail we need an entire new batch of political parties. A working democracy needs a good government but also a good opposition


  • Advertisement
  • #7
    Stark
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,084 ✭✭✭✭Stark


    I doubt FG are really against NAMA. They just say that publicly to be populist.


  • #8
    leninbenjamin
    Closed Accounts Posts: 8,983 ✭✭✭leninbenjamin


    Stark wrote: »
    They just say that publicly to be populist.

    Hammer. Nail. Head. Bang!


  • #9
    Riskymove
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,900 ✭✭✭✭Riskymove


    Deleted User wrote: »
    I thought they abandoned pairing? ^^
    Stupid idea anyway

    its not really, its supposed to help the system from being used for party political purposes

    e.g. lets say a Minister or the Taoiseach is involved in some important talks or meetings...so the oppossition just keep scheduling votes so he (and everyone else) all have to rush to the Dail to vote on a foregone conclusion


    its used even more cynicly than that in the US, especially during election campaigns


Advertisement