Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

how do you calculate the head loss for this pipe

  • 07-11-2009 10:46am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 618 ✭✭✭


    I have the following question it deals with the sudden contraction of a pipe... I have the following answers.but I am looking how do you calculate the head loss
    v1=1.783m/s
    v2=3.164m/s
    a1=0.0314m2 (pie*.1^2)
    a2=.0177m2 (pie*.075^2)

    Q=.056m3/s
    a2/a1=.5636


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 618 ✭✭✭johnnyc


    Anybody have any idea please, i am stuck....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 159 ✭✭Philistine


    Not sure if this is actually what you're looking for but its a good starting point.


    http://www.efunda.com/formulae/fluids/calc_pipe_friction.cfm


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 618 ✭✭✭johnnyc


    Ok the first section of the pipe is 200mm in width and it suddenly goes to 150mm in width for the next segment.... I am trying to first calculate the coefficent... This is what i am getting i can be corrected if i am wrong
    KL=(1-A2/A1)^2
    (1-.5625)^2=0.191


    (BUT I KNOW I AM WRONG HERE AS I HAVE THE LECTURER ANSWER WHICH IS 0.107)
    HEAD LOSS=KL(V2^2/2G)
    >.191(3.164/2*9.81)
    >.191(10.011/19.62)
    >.191(.161)
    >0.031

    i HAVE TRY TO FIGURE IT OUT BY MYSELF TO NO AVAIL


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,738 ✭✭✭mawk




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,082 ✭✭✭Nukem


    Don't you have to have pipe lengths and friction factors for this calculation? (please note been a while since i did fluids)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 618 ✭✭✭johnnyc


    Thanks mawk and nukem for your responses....Mawk the temperature is the same between the two segments, the pipe width is 200mm and suddenly contracts to 150mm pipe width.... With the calculations above you should be able to get the coefficent?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 62 ✭✭Granny Lover


    you could use bernoullis equation
    (P1/ρg)+((v1^2)/2g)+z1+hp=(P2/ρg)+((v2^2)/2g)+z2+hf
    Where:
    P= pressure
    ρ=density (water= 1000)
    g=gravity (9.81)
    v=velocity
    Z=change in height
    Hp=pump head
    Hf= head loss due to friction

    most cades something in the equation will cancel such as z if there is no change in height this formula only works for fluids for compressed air there is another formula
    if you cant work it out from this look up darcys formula.
    that is the way we calculate it out in college


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 327 ✭✭sme


    As this is pipe contraction A1 doesn't really matter, a vena contracta forms immediately after the contraction and the headloss is due to the expansions which follows. Empirically the area contracts by about 40% so you get Kl = 0.44. Although this still doesn't get the same answer as your lecturer.

    hl = (0.44V2^2)/2g = (0.44*3.164^2)/2g = 0.225m

    Given that you posted this 3 weeks ago, this probably won't help!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,738 ✭✭✭mawk


    johnnyc wrote: »
    Thanks mawk and nukem for your responses....Mawk the temperature is the same between the two segments, the pipe width is 200mm and suddenly contracts to 150mm pipe width.... With the calculations above you should be able to get the coefficent?

    Weird.. I just saw own response in this thread and neither remembered writing it nor knew why i brought lmtd up..

    I think i must have read head loss as heat loss early in the morning stupids sometimes..


Advertisement