Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

VPN site to site problem

  • 05-11-2009 11:37AM
    #1
    horgan_p
    Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 2,612 Mod ✭✭✭✭


    ok this is something obvious that i'm missing , heres the setup:


    galway network :

    100.100.5.x
    255.255.0.0


    waterford network

    10.1.1.x
    255.255.255.0

    dc is in galway with 100.100.5.1

    waterford have a member server : 10.1.1.1

    site to site vpn is in place.

    anyone in waterford (10.1.1.x) can ping galway (100.100.5.1) server - all is cool.

    the server in galway (100.100.5.1) can ping the waterford (10.1.1.1) server - this also is cool

    however workstations in waterford (100.100.5.x)cannot find the server in galway (10.1.1.1).

    i have checked the dns forwarders , which seem to be ok given that the 100.100.5.1 can traverse the vpn and ping the 10.1.1.1

    the vpn is obviously working (at least for forwarding requests from 100.100.5.1), the routers are netgear w834gv5 (indentical firmware both sites)

    I've tried to be as clear as i can be - any ideas ??


Comments

  • #2
    horgan_p
    Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 2,612 Mod ✭✭✭✭horgan_p


    i , good sirs ,am an idiot.
    Problem was with the vpn policy.
    it was when i read my post back to myself that it made sense.


  • #3
    accensi0n
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,929 ✭✭✭accensi0n


    horgan_p wrote: »
    i , good sirs ,am an idiot.
    Problem was with the vpn policy.
    it was when i read my post back to myself that it made sense.

    Any chance you could post the problem and solution?

    Cheers.


  • #4
    horgan_p
    Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 2,612 Mod ✭✭✭✭horgan_p


    howdy ,
    what i had done was allowed 10.1.1.0 through one end of the vpn , but only allowed 100.100.5.1 back up the pipe.
    what i changed on both routers policies was changed it to 100.100.5.0 to allow any pc on the 100.100.5.x range to communicate with the 10.1.1.x network.


    Because i did most of my testing on the server machines , it slipped through.


Advertisement