Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Arsenal - Sat 30th Oct

  • 28-10-2009 1:04pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 858 ✭✭✭


    I seriously think we are going to find it hard at the Library MkII, this saturday.

    NO Lennon, Defoe, Modric, Woodgate plus the ever constant worry of 'will Ledley break down' throughout the match.

    This is starting 11, I think is most probable.....
    Gomes

    Corluka Bassong King BAE

    Bentley Palacios Hudd Krancjar

    Keane Crouch

    It's also possible that Harry may play one up front and bring Jenas in for a five man midfield, which would probably see Robbie on the bench. Either way there's no pace, which going to leave us with a very blunt attack.

    Ever the pessimist :rolleyes:, I can't see us taking anything from this game. If we can get a draw, I'd be delighted.


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,153 ✭✭✭everdead.ie


    crouch is injured isn't he will he be fit on sat?
    could see an interesting line up of
    Gomes
    Córluka King Bassong BAE

    Bently Hudd Palacios Bale

    Kranjcar

    Keane

    Seeing as Pav wasn't great yesterday and we'd outnumber and outmuscle them in midfield this way
    Jenas has a calf strain so I think he'll start on the bench
    Maybe a couple of kids hutton and pav on the bench too


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 313 ✭✭StillRickyVilla


    I have a nasty feeling that the wheels are coming off.

    The injuries/suspensions are mounting up and we just don't have top-class quality back-up. Pav, Crouch, Bale, Bentley - who-ever - they are not good enough to go to the Emirates and pull off a result.

    If we go there and attack our first 11 would have had a shout but as we don't have our normal strike-force we will get stuffed. If we go there and defend we'll get thumped anyway.

    Im in pessimistic mode and a win at home to tired/under-strength Everton in the Carling Cup doesnt change that.

    Comfortable win for the scum 3-0 (would be delighted if proven otherwise!)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,827 ✭✭✭Mr. Guappa


    I'd go with Jenas over Huddlestone, we will need his energy in the centre of the park. If Crouch is out I would go with Kranjcar in the hole and Bale on the left. We have the best away record in the league and while Arsenal can be irresistible at times they will also switch off at times, i.e. West Ham at the weekend, Champs League last week and at Old Trafford earlier in the season. If we avoid stupid mistakes we are well capable of coming away with 3 points.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,661 ✭✭✭mickman


    everyone here said we would beat stoke -we lost

    everyone here is saying arsenal will win so the contrarian in me says we will win!!

    in all seriousness i think we will get a kicking here. arshavin will eat slow corluka for his lunch, fabregas will glide past huddlestone as if he wasnt there

    van persie will score 2 with his pace

    3-1 to arsenal


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,467 ✭✭✭mushykeogh


    Park the bus harry!


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 180 ✭✭BOLT


    I have a nasty feeling that the wheels are coming off.

    The injuries/suspensions are mounting up and we just don't have top-class quality back-up. Pav, Crouch, Bale, Bentley - who-ever - they are not good enough to go to the Emirates and pull off a result.

    If we go there and attack our first 11 would have had a shout but as we don't have our normal strike-force we will get stuffed. If we go there and defend we'll get thumped anyway.

    Im in pessimistic mode and a win at home to tired/under-strength Everton in the Carling Cup doesnt change that.

    Comfortable win for the scum 3-0 (would be delighted if proven otherwise!)


    All internationals!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,951 ✭✭✭SuprSi


    To be honest, I think we may even struggle to get a goal there without Lennon, Modric, or Defoe, especially if we resort to pumping it up to Crouch.

    3 - 0 to Arsenal


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,153 ✭✭✭everdead.ie


    My worst fear is this could be an end to our top 4 ambitions especially with both villa and man city having a game in hand


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 313 ✭✭StillRickyVilla


    BOLT wrote: »
    All internationals!
    Ok.
    Pav - too lightweight & not enough passion for English prem
    Crouch - he is never going to be more than Plan B in any top side
    Bale - we didn't win a game with him for 3 years (and Wales doesn't count!)
    Bentley - your having a laugh?!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,661 ✭✭✭mickman


    still ricky


    we have won a game with bale in the side (recently, he came on a sub )
    being light weight has nothing to do with being good in the premiership (look at modric) - lack of effort and passion is pavs problem
    bentley- is a much better crosser then lennon will ever be


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,672 ✭✭✭keane=cock


    mickman wrote: »
    still ricky


    we have won a game with bale in the side (recently, he came on a sub )
    being light weight has nothing to do with being good in the premiership (look at modric) - lack of effort and passion is pavs problem
    bentley- is a much better crosser then lennon will ever be


    think bentley, since he came to spurs, has been the least consistant and under performing than at any other stage in his career but that is a very fair comment. even his poor crosses are better than lennons good ones. think his confidence has taken a bashing. realy thought he would come good but so far no, he hasnt.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,661 ✭✭✭mickman


    to be honest sat is his day. if he starts and delivers a few peaches on to crouchs head and has a good game then he has a chance of staying.

    pav though is gone for sure. there is no saving that waster


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 313 ✭✭StillRickyVilla


    mickman wrote: »
    still ricky


    we have won a game with bale in the side (recently, he came on a sub )
    being light weight has nothing to do with being good in the premiership (look at modric) - lack of effort and passion is pavs problem
    bentley- is a much better crosser then lennon will ever be
    Bale has been useless since he joined Spurs, either injured, off-form or too busy getting his hair-clip in place.

    Bentley can cross it, but won't be allowed, he has nowhere near enough pace for the prem (i would rather trust Wenger's judgement than Commolli).

    Same goes for Pav/Crouch - no pace - too easy to defend against, they belong in the 80's.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 180 ✭✭BOLT


    Bale has been useless since he joined Spurs, either injured, off-form or too busy getting his hair-clip in place.

    Bentley can cross it, but won't be allowed, he has nowhere near enough pace for the prem (i would rather trust Wenger's judgement than Commolli).

    Same goes for Pav/Crouch - no pace - too easy to defend against, they belong in the 80's.

    Now I know you're 'having a laugh'


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 180 ✭✭BOLT


    49 goals in 98 appearances for Liverpool....yep, dead easy to defend against, worthless lanky fecker.

    And 18 goals in 35 appearances for England...

    Indeed all those defenders must have been so happy to see crouch gangling on to the pitch..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,672 ✭✭✭keane=cock



    Bentley can cross it, but won't be allowed, he has nowhere near enough pace for the prem (i would rather trust Wenger's judgement than Commolli).

    quote]


    i have read somewhere that he is one of the quickest players in the league.think it was on that nike vapour add or something(the one where lennon raced against abonglahor)


  • Company Representative Posts: 2,957 ✭✭✭Gamesnash.ie: Pat


    Well I am absolutely certain we're going to win. :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 313 ✭✭StillRickyVilla


    BOLT wrote: »
    49 goals in 98 appearances for Liverpool....yep, dead easy to defend against, worthless lanky fecker.

    And 18 goals in 35 appearances for England...

    Indeed all those defenders must have been so happy to see crouch gangling on to the pitch..
    Look at it another way, can you really see Wenger ever having Crouch/Pav/Bentley & co as a starter in one of his teams? If you think he would well - fair play to you! (He got rid of Bentley for a start!)

    I personally think Defoe, Modric & Lennon would definitely have a shout of making the Arsenal or any other Top 4 team.

    Thats why Arse are strong favs on sat

    p.s those Crouch statistics are inaccurate & annoying. Actually his PL goal statistics for Liverpool were 22 goals in 85 games, nearly 1 in every 4! In fact Crouch was never considered good enough to be a starter for Liverpool actually went 30-odd games for them before he scored! As for England did you research the teams that he scored all those goals against? I'll tell you - Jamaica, Trinidad & Tobago, Andorra, Belarus, Macedonia, Greece, Estonia, Croatia, Hungary & Uruguay. The only other 'big' club Crouch has been at was Aston Villa where he was a disaster for 2 years and was farmed out on loan to Norwich City! Crouch's career goal ratio (as i posted up on here a few months ago) is much inferior to all of Defoe/Keane/Pav and Bent (who has since gone on to top the Prem scoring charts since we let him go). And on top of all of that - when Crouch plays, as I predicted, we tend to start throwing longer balls up to him rather than playing through midfield, making us look one-dimensional and predictable - if Stoke were able to suss it out, I'm sure Wenger will!
    The media seem to love Crouch because he is a 'gangly lanky bloke done good', yet there is absolutely no evidence to support his inclusion in any top team (as a starter anyway).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 317 ✭✭ohnoigotsick


    Look at it another way, can you really see Wenger ever having Crouch/Pav/Bentley & co as a starter in one of his teams? If you think he would well - fair play to you! (He got rid of Bentley for a start!)

    I personally think Defoe, Modric & Lennon would definitely have a shout of making the Arsenal or any other Top 4 team.

    Thats why Arse are strong favs on sat


    wenger has his team playing a particular way - ie they have to almost walk the all into the net each time - the scum could do with having a player like pav


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 313 ✭✭StillRickyVilla


    wenger has his team playing a particular way - ie they have to almost walk the all into the net each time - the scum could do with having a player like pav
    As much as it is painful to say, your a brave man to question the judgement of someone who has won 3 Premier Leagues (5 times Runners Up), 4 FA Cups, a UEFA Cup and a Champions League Runner Up. And all of that whilst playing almost a Brazil-like brand of football and spending far less than us in the transfer market!

    p.s he's still a pa0do


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,778 ✭✭✭✭Kold


    Bentley is a f*cking sh*tter.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,994 ✭✭✭KingdomYid


    get Huddlestone off that park,he is a soft boy and he is bricking it today.:mad:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,536 ✭✭✭dabbler2004


    Thank god for half time, the last ten minutes have been a nightmare :mad:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,994 ✭✭✭KingdomYid


    chokers always have been always will be i am afraid :mad:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,661 ✭✭✭mickman


    well we are getting mauled again today.

    this is the start of the rot people. our confidence will be very low after today unless we have an amazing second half


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 455 ✭✭Dave11


    As always lads with football its always about the next goal!!!

    Don't write us off just yet!

    Huddlestone has been very poor and Palacios looks tired AGAIN!!!

    Look at the heads down coming out the tunnel! They nearly had to push Bassong back onto the pitch :mad:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 313 ✭✭StillRickyVilla


    Who are we fecking Bolton, trying to break it up and hit Crouch's head with a set-piece...we got what we deserved. Scum showed their quality there.

    Still its not all over, Arse do concede if we go for it 2nd half..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 455 ✭✭Dave11


    Oh great is Gareth Bale!!!!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 313 ✭✭StillRickyVilla


    Thats it, we never learn. I can't take any more of this, see yer later...i give up


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,536 ✭✭✭dabbler2004


    You wouldn't see this at schoolboy level :mad:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,661 ✭✭✭mickman


    what happened for the 3rd goal, was it gomes or the defenders fault?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 455 ✭✭Dave11


    You could argur that both of them should have got it cleared!!!

    Bently has been so poor. I'm disgusted by his attitude! Out of the team for months, gets an oppurtunity and does nothing with it! He is prepared to sit on the bench and play a bit in the reserves for his chq!!! Get him out in January!!

    I'm a big Robbie Keane fan but he looks so disinterested last few games! His record reads 5 in 11 this season but sure four of them were in one game so thats 9 without a goal!!! Not good enough!

    Can someone please tell me when is Luka back???


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,661 ✭✭✭mickman


    luka is back next saturday for our game at home to sunderland


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 313 ✭✭StillRickyVilla


    Comprehensive 3 - 0 defeat. Most of us predicted that one.

    Why is Harry & Co going on about what a great squad we've got? Its b0llox - as soon as we lose our main men, the back-up is just NOT good enough! I'll say it again, Crouch, Pav, Bentley, Bale etc etc etc are NOT good enough.

    Unless Defoe, Modric & Lennon are back, and stay fit, quickly, we will quickly be sucked into mid-table.

    Get rid of the crap & bring in some top-quality back-up in January. The scum had Walcott, Rosicky out today, but could still count on Van Persie & Arsevin! Their squad is on a different planet to ours!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,661 ✭✭✭mickman


    it was 3-0. it should have been at least 4 to be honest. eduardo missed a sitter and we were lucky with other ones. we lost 3-0 to chelsea but actually played well and had chances, today we had nothing

    our defense really is pathetic. king was shown up today as i thought he would be. crouch was just moping around and dont get me started on keane


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,299 ✭✭✭BERBA


    Only consolation is that all teams just below us drew or lost. imo first 3 spots nailed down , 4th spot up for grabs the way pool are playin. Anything less than 6 pts in next 2 games v sunderland and wigan and we can kiss it goodbye.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,672 ✭✭✭keane=cock


    didnt see the match or the highlights yet but realisticly i didnt see us beating the ARSEnal but of the big four we really never looked like loosing to liverpool but theyare bein found out this season but against chelsea n man u we wee second best. r we put up a fight but conceded too many goals. 3 in all games!

    we still have a bit to go to match them.

    just imagine the speech fergie, ARSEne, n ancholliti(spellin) sayin :these boys think they are gonna finish in the top 4? lets make them prove they are as good as us. results dont lie. we are getting better, a lot better, but not there yet im afraid.

    still

    COME ON YOU SPURS


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 180 ✭✭BOLT


    keane=cock wrote: »
    didnt see the match or the highlights yet but realisticly i didnt see us beating the ARSEnal but of the big four we really never looked like loosing to liverpool but theyare bein found out this season but against chelsea n man u we wee second best. r we put up a fight but conceded too many goals. 3 in all games!

    we still have a bit to go to match them.

    just imagine the speech fergie, ARSEne, n ancholliti(spellin) sayin :these boys think they are gonna finish in the top 4? lets make them prove they are as good as us. results dont lie. we are getting better, a lot better, but not there yet im afraid.

    still

    COME ON YOU SPURS

    Thank **** for that last post!

    Why some so called Spurs supporters here don't bugger off to support the Arse is beyond me.....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,057 ✭✭✭tippspur


    We were lucky today that we weren't beaten by 5 or 6 tbh,Wilson gave away a bad ball and only for a great save by Gomes it would have ended up in the net,he wasen't so lucky the next time he gave one away because it did end up in the net.we really fell apart after the two quick goals up to that i thought we were going well.Pav looks like a man who doesn't give a ***t anymore and just wants out,.jesus you could go on and on about the crap that went on in this game but i haven't the energy.the next game can't come soon enough.:mad::mad:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,467 ✭✭✭mushykeogh


    mickman wrote: »
    luka is back next saturday for our game at home to sunderland

    wont be back till late november according to harry.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,752 ✭✭✭markesmith


    Come on boys, we were missing our three best players (Lennon, Modders and Defoe) and also Woodgate, who's an obvious first-teamer.

    If Arsenal were missing Flabbergast, Arse-shaving, van Persie and the Chelsea mole, it wouldn't have been a 3-0 scoreline.

    These derbies are always nervy affairs. Yeah, we were beaten pretty comprehensively, but we shouldn't be so up-and-down about our fortunes. Leave that to Liverpool.

    That said, King needs to be looked at. Because he can't start every game, I think it gets in the way of us having a settled back four. And I don't know what Assou-Ekotto was at for the third goal, you play to the whistle, that's just elementary.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,661 ✭✭✭mickman


    the 3rd goal was totally gomes fault. king was at the right side of van persie and had him covered. gomes went for the ball, his arms were out far enough but the ball went under them (crap goal keeping), his touch then sent the ball under kings legs and to van persie

    on sat we will have woodie back who i think is our best CB by a mile. we will have lennon on the right,


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 313 ✭✭StillRickyVilla


    mickman wrote: »
    the 3rd goal was totally gomes fault. king was at the right side of van persie and had him covered. gomes went for the ball, his arms were out far enough but the ball went under them (crap goal keeping), his touch then sent the ball under kings legs and to van persie

    on sat we will have woodie back who i think is our best CB by a mile. we will have lennon on the right,
    Yes, we need Woodgate back & fit alongside King - hopefully that bit of experience should eliminate some of the errors that have been creeping in. We will need Lennon back on the right. I can't see Bentley playing for Spurs again.


Advertisement