Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Acoustics & EQ?

  • 27-10-2009 3:48pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,093 ✭✭✭


    How does this sound to you guys:

    Your average LDC will have a min. frequency response of 20Hz.
    A low 'E' guitar string, played open and tuned to concert pitch has a frequency of about 82Hz.

    So logically, before I even listen to what I've tracked, I should roll off everything below 82Hz as it's just recording frequencies my guitar is incapable fo making.

    What do we think?


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,790 ✭✭✭PaulBrewer


    Yup , however there could be lower frequencies that are the initial 'thud' or 'attack' of the note that may or may not be desirable.

    However as a rule of thumb you'd be ok to do that.

    A Low Cut filter is usually at 80 or 100 Hz and is for doing just that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,093 ✭✭✭TelePaul


    PaulBrewer wrote: »
    Yup , however there could be lower frequencies that are the initial 'thud' or 'attack' of the note that may or not be desirable.

    However as a rule of thumb you'd be ok to do that.

    A Low Cut filter is usually at 80 or 100 Hz and is for doing just that.

    Awesome. Take that conservatory reflections!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 616 ✭✭✭ogy


    i start with a high pass filter on every track in a mix at 100hz, except for kick drum and bass guitar which i'd high pass at 30hz. then as i go through each track i move the filter up or down to taste. the higher i can high pass a track (without sacrificing the sound) the less mud i get in the full mix i find.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,892 ✭✭✭madtheory


    Yes, generally "bracketing" the spectrum of each instrument is a good idea. Just be sure to do an a/B test listen, some filters have unpleasant artifacts well above or below the cutoff frequency, such as phasing and/ or ringing.

    A spectrum analyzer is very educational. The only free one I know of is the RNDigital Inspector, but they're offline at the mo. If you're on a PC with a VST compatible host, there are several free ones available.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 252 ✭✭kfoltman


    madtheory wrote: »
    A spectrum analyzer is very educational. The only free one I know of is the RNDigital Inspector, but they're offline at the mo. If you're on a PC with a VST compatible host, there are several free ones available.

    I use this one (PC VST): http://www.meldaproduction.com/freevstplugins/manalyzer.php


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,093 ✭✭✭TelePaul


    madtheory wrote: »
    Yes, generally "bracketing" the spectrum of each instrument is a good idea. Just be sure to do an a/B test listen, some filters have unpleasant artifacts well above or below the cutoff frequency, such as phasing and/ or ringing.

    A spectrum analyzer is very educational. The only free one I know of is the RNDigital Inspector, but they're offline at the mo. If you're on a PC with a VST compatible host, there are several free ones available.

    Thanks for that. I have Voxengos SPAN - mostly used for 'proving' to my friend that his mixes are too muddy :)


Advertisement