Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Stan Collymore is not a very good "journalist"

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,304 ✭✭✭Oliver1985


    God thats a load of waffle!!! The relegation is a good part of the league and makes it a lot more interesting to!!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,442 ✭✭✭Bandit12


    Stan Collymore. Living proof that any fool can make as a pundit.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,372 ✭✭✭✭Mr Alan


    quite an extraordinarily stupid article alright.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,470 ✭✭✭TheBigLebowski


    Sounds like a good idea. The premier league has long been trying to maket itself as THE biggest league internationally. There's little or no interest internationally in the "smaller" games. They may aswell do this as they sold their souls long ago...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,560 ✭✭✭✭Kess73


    I quite like the way he thinks a league with 25 clubs means each team plays 50 games. :D


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,571 ✭✭✭✭Frisbee


    Holy Lamb of Jayzus, that's one steaming pile of faeces


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,560 ✭✭✭✭Kess73


    Bandit12 wrote: »
    Stan Collymore. Living proof that any fool can make as a pundit.



    Jamie Redknapp had already proven that. :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,323 ✭✭✭Savman


    Methinks he hasn't thought this one thru. They say wife beating'll do that to ya :rolleyes:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 88,972 ✭✭✭✭mike65


    I think he's onto a winner but they could beef it up a bit more with North and South leagues and a mega play off to see who is the champions!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,154 ✭✭✭✭Neil3030


    Just found this receipt under a bench in Birmingham Airport. Looks like we've all been conned by his entrepreneurial genius...
    Date: 20/10/09

    VISA: S Collymore XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX

    Items:

    100,000 x Shares in Leeds United Football Club..........£0.50
    100,000 x Shares in Newcastle United Football Club....£0.50
    1 x Pen...............................................................£0.20
    1 x Envelope........................................................£0.10
    1 x Notepad.........................................................£0.99
    1 x Daily Mirror.....................................................£0.30
    1 x 'How to get any old crap published in a
    tabloid Newspaper - E. Dunphy'
    ..........................£4.99

    Total.................................................................£7.58


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,466 ✭✭✭✭SlickRic


    to think, in these times, a man like that has a job.

    he couldn't have extracted more words from his backside if he tried.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,905 ✭✭✭✭Handsome Bob


    Bandit12 wrote: »
    Stan Collymore. Living proof that any fool can make as a pundit.

    Add Cascarino, Merson, Whelan and Haughton to that list. ;)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,661 ✭✭✭✭Helix


    farcical article aside, collymore is one of the best pundits in the game


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,908 ✭✭✭Daysha


    The comments left underneath the article are brilliant.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,372 ✭✭✭✭Mr Alan


    Helix wrote: »
    farcical article aside, collymore is one of the best pundits in the game

    tell me you are messing?!?!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 36,634 ✭✭✭✭Ruu_Old


    Maybe he can go back to acting..oh wait.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,493 ✭✭✭DazMarz


    What absolute and utter bollockology of the highest order!!!

    Imagine, if there was no promotion/relegation, only 4 or 5 teams in the whole Premier League would have anything to play for!

    And Manchester United vs. Leeds United... Was a huge fixture back in the day. If the current Leeds squad faced up to the current Man Utd squad in a League game... would it be 7-0 or 8-0 I wonder? My money would be on a record-breaking thrashing. How is that a big, epic derby?! Maybe in 4 or 5 seasons if Leeds claw their way back up top, it might be, but as the venerable Collyhead suggests, we just ditch them back into the top flight, they would be crucified.

    The addition of these smaller clubs to the English Top Flight adds uncertainty and excitement; who knows what could happen. Burnley vs. Man United, anyone? Wigan vs. Chelsea:(, anyone? Stoke vs. Spurs??? The list goes on of infamous losses to supposed minnow teams.

    This piece of football ''journalism'' makes several innane proposals that would serve to only cripple the game in England, making the Continental game (La Liga in particular) all the more appealing and respected.

    The mere suggestion of teams playing MORE games in a season is also ridiculous. 38 games is enough as it is, players are being pushed to their limits. To add more, to increase the total games to 48 in a season (not 50, as Collyhead says; if there are 25 teams in the league, there would not be 50 games a season, but 48 games per season) would not only tire players more, but would end careers earlier and make the English league unattractive to foreign players and/or younger players who would want a longer career.

    If this kind of infantile piffle is what passes for journalism nowadays...


  • Moderators, Regional East Moderators Posts: 23,238 Mod ✭✭✭✭GLaDOS


    I hope for his sake he's doing it for the contaversy

    Cake, and grief counseling, will be available at the conclusion of the test



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,483 ✭✭✭Töpher


    Publicity stunt tbh.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,498 ✭✭✭✭cson


    The Mirror tbh ;)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,024 ✭✭✭JokerD


    As a Leeds fan, I think this is a wonderful idea:pac:, however we'll be back soon enough either way and to the guy who said "would it be 7 or 8 nil I wonder" if United played Leeds now?.............good one


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,824 ✭✭✭✭nullzero
    °°°°°


    The headline said it all.
    What a stupid idea.
    He didn't cover himself in glory on Setanta last year and I've never taken anything he says seriously.

    Glazers Out!



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 970 ✭✭✭Kirnsy


    Sounds like a good idea. The premier league has long been trying to maket itself as THE biggest league internationally. There's little or no interest internationally in the "smaller" games. They may aswell do this as they sold their souls long ago...

    you forgot the sarcastic smiley to show you were messing....:rolleyes: <-- there


    here's a few more for stan's 'idea' :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,836 ✭✭✭Sir Gallagher


    LZ5by5 wrote: »
    Add Cascarino, Merson, Whelan and Haughton to that list. ;)

    I see your Cascarino, Merson and Haughton and i'll raise you Kenny "combforward" Cunningham.

    On Topic

    Collymore is clearly insane but i don't think he's this insane, just done for the controversy i reckon.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,142 ✭✭✭koHd


    Has April 1st come early ?

    Had to be a publicity stunt.

    Besides the ridiculous idea there's way too many errors in the article that wouldn't make it past an editor.

    Unless the editor thinks to himself this is a great way to drive traffic to our site it's so badly thought out/written by an already hated and famous name.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,661 ✭✭✭✭Helix


    Mr Alan wrote: »
    tell me you are messing?!?!

    not at all

    when he used to do the uefa cup with channel 5 he was fantastic


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 12,325 Mod ✭✭✭✭Kingp35


    DazMarz wrote: »
    And Manchester United vs. Leeds United... Was a huge fixture back in the day. If the current Leeds squad faced up to the current Man Utd squad in a League game... would it be 7-0 or 8-0 I wonder? My money would be on a record-breaking thrashing. How is that a big, epic derby?! Maybe in 4 or 5 seasons if Leeds claw their way back up top, it might be, but as the venerable Collyhead suggests, we just ditch them back into the top flight, they would be crucified.

    Almost as ridiculous as Collymore's article.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,472 ✭✭✭✭Blazer


    great article...as a newcastle fan it would be great if we could never be relegated :D
    however I'd think we'd get sick of the 5-0 trashings by just about every other team in the league.
    So the bottom of the league would look like this..

    24. Newcastle 0 wins 50 trashings. 150 goals against. 1 for.
    25. Leeds 0 wins 50 trashings. 300 goals against 1 for.

    :D


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 83 ✭✭Rics


    DazMarz wrote: »
    What absolute and utter bollockology of the highest order!!!

    Imagine, if there was no promotion/relegation, only 4 or 5 teams in the whole Premier League would have anything to play for!

    And Manchester United vs. Leeds United... Was a huge fixture back in the day. If the current Leeds squad faced up to the current Man Utd squad in a League game... would it be 7-0 or 8-0 I wonder? My money would be on a record-breaking thrashing. How is that a big, epic derby?! Maybe in 4 or 5 seasons if Leeds claw their way back up top, it might be, but as the venerable Collyhead suggests, we just ditch them back into the top flight, they would be crucified.

    The addition of these smaller clubs to the English Top Flight adds uncertainty and excitement; who knows what could happen. Burnley vs. Man United, anyone? Wigan vs. Chelsea:(, anyone? Stoke vs. Spurs??? The list goes on of infamous losses to supposed minnow teams.

    This piece of football ''journalism'' makes several innane proposals that would serve to only cripple the game in England, making the Continental game (La Liga in particular) all the more appealing and respected.

    The mere suggestion of teams playing MORE games in a season is also ridiculous. 38 games is enough as it is, players are being pushed to their limits. To add more, to increase the total games to 48 in a season (not 50, as Collyhead says; if there are 25 teams in the league, there would not be 50 games a season, but 48 games per season) would not only tire players more, but would end careers earlier and make the English league unattractive to foreign players and/or younger players who would want a longer career.

    If this kind of infantile piffle is what passes for journalism nowadays...

    This is where I stopped taking you seriously


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,591 ✭✭✭✭Aidric


    Sounds like a Stan Staunton article.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,289 ✭✭✭gucci


    This is pure chance taking by people who have seen clubs as a method to get enhance their ego and earnings

    A direct quote from the Collymore article, which could be said to be the theme of the article for him personally as well.

    Beautiful picture of him though.....do you think thats the dashboard of his car he is leaning on? ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,836 ✭✭✭Vokes


    Helix wrote: »
    Mr Alan wrote: »
    tell me you are messing?!?!
    not at all

    when he used to do the uefa cup with channel 5 he was fantastic
    He was covering the Fulham / Roma game last week with CH5. He's pretty decent at it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,081 ✭✭✭thegen


    His celebrity is waning me thinks and the dogging sites wont allow him in;)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,543 ✭✭✭JerryHandbag


    Stanley should stick to getting killed off at the beginning of Sharon Stone movies. Dreadful article.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 700 ✭✭✭Prufrock


    Get rid of relegation and promotion? What about the "smaller" clubs? Newcastle and Leeds earned relegation by playing terrible football. How does keeping em in the top flight make the league better? Sounds like Stans been smoking them funny cigarettes to me.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,493 ✭✭✭DazMarz


    Kingp35 wrote: »
    Almost as ridiculous as Collymore's article.
    Rics wrote: »
    This is where I stopped taking you seriously

    Oh come on! Are you telling me that Leeds United, as they currently stand, would be any match for Man United?!

    If United were to field a standard League-game team:

    Van der Sar, O'Shea, Ferdinand, Vidic, Evra, Carrick, Valencia, Scholes, Giggs, Berbatov, Rooney

    with subs bench:

    Foster, Neville, Anderson, da Silva, Evans, Owen, Nani

    can you tell me, with your hand on your heart, that Leeds would not be subjected to a humiliation? I think not. Ok, maybe if something freaky happens, they might not get completely eviscerated. But going on current standings in the football league (United 2nd in 1st Tier; Leeds 1st in 3rd Tier), form over the last few seasons (United won 3 Premier Leagues in a row from 06/07, 07/08, 08/09; Champions League Winners 2008, Runners Up 2009 etc. Leeds: Relegated from C'ship in 2007; failed promotion twice)... How can anyone think that I'm being ridiculous, well, apart from Leeds fans?

    I thought anyone that would know their football would not need the facts dissected in front of them... but apparently some people do!

    Leeds United, through the fault of poor management and gambling on the team's performance, are a mere shadow of the team they once were. Manchester United are easily one of the best teams in the world; their recent record in both domestic and European competition speaks for itself.

    Yes, if Man United and Leeds were to meet in a cup (League, FA etc.) competition, MU would field a far weaker team than a league fixture and it could be a closer competition than most would expect (see: Leeds vs. Liverpool in Carling Cup earlier this year). But, if as is suggested in Collymore's article, Leeds were auto-promoted to the Top Flight again in their current guise... They would be no match for Man United. Or a league-game Liverpool side (much different from the Carling Cup side!). Or Chelsea. Or Arsenal. Or Man City. Nobody. They would be the new Derby County (11 points, anyone?) or WBA. Bottom feeders.

    I'll admit a some dramatic hyperbole on my part (7-0 was hyperbole at its finest!), but I firmly believe that Leeds United are not good enough for Top Flight football as it stands. In a few years, maybe. But until they manage to get out of League One, and then out of the Championship and into the Premier League again, they are simply not good enough to compete at that level, no matter what Stan Collymore, Kingp35 or Rics may think.

    I'll tone myself down a bit. I think Man United would win by at least 3 goals if the current Leeds side and (Van der Sar, O'Shea, Ferdinand, Vidic, Evra, Carrick, Valencia, Scholes, Giggs, Berbatov, Rooney

    with subs bench:

    Foster, Neville, Anderson, da Silva, Evans, Owen, Nani) THAT Man United side were to play each other in an important game within the coming 12 months. Anyone that says different, well... Feel free to find some solid reasons as to why I'm wrong, instead of slagging me off.

    Cheers:rolleyes:


Advertisement