Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

New lens any suggestions

  • 24-10-2009 3:04pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 99 ✭✭


    Hi folks,

    I have a Canon 30 D and I'm thinking of getting a new lens.
    I'm currently using the 18 - 85 that came with the camera.
    but I'm looking for wider aperture.

    hoping to get one that's good as an all rounder (not a major telephoto or anything) but good for portraits with a bit of zoom on it.

    So what would you guys get?


Comments

  • Moderators, Education Moderators, Music Moderators Posts: 10,686 Mod ✭✭✭✭melekalikimaka


    24-70 2.8


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,150 ✭✭✭kumate_champ07


    if your on a budget this might be a good choice
    http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Tamron-17-50mm-f-2.8-XR-Di-II-VC-Lens-Review.aspx

    its just been released for canon mount, the previous version seems to be good.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,277 ✭✭✭✭Rb


    24-70 2.8
    This.

    Depends on the budget though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 99 ✭✭tullie


    thanks, have to have a look at the budget and do some window shopping over the next while

    still undecided


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 99 ✭✭tullie


    actually, its way over the budget but any thoughts on the canon 16-35?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,319 ✭✭✭sineadw


    I'd be thinking 16-35 is waaaaay too short for portrait stuff. Even the 70mm might be a bit short.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,584 ✭✭✭PCPhoto


    sineadw wrote: »
    I'd be thinking 16-35 is waaaaay too short for portrait stuff. Even the 70mm might be a bit short.

    I would disagree with that - I enjoy portraits with my 16-35mm .... equally 70-200mm is great for portraits.....all depends on the style of portrait you are after and the situation you are in (background etc)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,150 ✭✭✭kumate_champ07


    canon ef 85mm f1.8
    it's an excellent lens, almost perfect except for some CA's in high contrast situations. I rarely see them.sharp from f1.8, very sharp at f2.8 and peaks at f5.6.

    bokeh is excellent, focus is quick and silent, its also a light lens.

    instead of saving up for 1 lens buy something cheaper you will use and when you got the rest of the cash saved up sell it and buy the other lens.

    tho I think you would want to hold onto the the 85mm f1.8
    if you want a more general purpose lens that has excellent bokeh and is great for portraits on a crop body you could try the sigma 50mm f1.4
    so far I've had no autofocus problems with it but be aware you may need to send it back to sigma for recalibration if there are problems which means you wont have the lens for 2weeks


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 23 diamondphoto


    Have you tried the 100/2.8 macro. Its a cracking lens and makes a very good portrait lens, with the advantage of being a marco, up to 1:1 magnification. Its not a 'L' lesn so you won't be paying huge money, though some photogs think it should be.

    Worth a look.

    Fergul


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 99 ✭✭tullie


    thanks for all the suggestions folks, loads to mull over


  • Advertisement
Advertisement