Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Drug Refund Scheme - Gay couples need not apply

Options
  • 23-10-2009 7:50am
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 89 ✭✭


    With this scheme the Dept. of Health & Children ensures that all Irish people will not have to pay more than €100 for a prescription in each month. It's a great scheme that anyone can sign up to, no need for a medical card or health insurance. An individual, couple or family can sign up - so one entire family or couple would have a €100 cap on what they must pay per month.

    A couple do not have to be married but - they do have to be heterosexual!

    So I and my partner of 12 years are ineligible and must pay €200 per month. But two heterosexuals who met up last week and are now calling themselves a couple only have to pay €100.

    Straightforward financial discrimination against gay people - the Irish Govt. fails us yet again.
    Tagged:


Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 3,357 ✭✭✭snappieT


    http://www.hse.ie/eng/services/Find_a_Service/entitlements/Drugs_Payment_Scheme/
    HSE.ie wrote:
    Under the Drugs Payment Scheme, an individual or family in Ireland [...]
    The definition of a family for this Scheme, is an adult, their spouse, and any children under 18 years

    Absolutely nothing mentioned about couples, of any sexuality. You can only go joint on the DPS if you're married: a spouse is someone who you have married legally.


  • Registered Users Posts: 916 ✭✭✭MicraBoy


    So I and my partner of 12 years are ineligible and must pay €200 per month. But two heterosexuals who met up last week and are now calling themselves a couple only have to pay €100.

    Civil partnership is your friend. Now stop making things up.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 89 ✭✭4red


    snappieT: You're incorrect. According to 1995 legislation in regard to this matter "Spouse is defined as each person of a married couple who are living together or a man and woman who are not married to each other but who are cohabiting as man and wife." See attached letter from the Dept. Health & Children outlining same. Or call the Dept. Health helpline on 1850 24 1850 and say you would like to apply for the scheme as a gay couple, and again as a cohabiting straight couple. Let us know how you get on...

    Micraboy: Civil partnership is your friend, ay? It hasn't been enacted yet.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 285 ✭✭sold


    4red wrote: »
    With this scheme the Dept. of Health & Children ensures that all Irish people will not have to pay more than €100 for a prescription in each month. It's a great scheme that anyone can sign up to, no need for a medical card or health insurance. An individual, couple or family can sign up - so one entire family or couple would have a €100 cap on what they must pay per month.

    A couple do not have to be married but - they do have to be heterosexual!

    So I and my partner of 12 years are ineligible and must pay €200 per month. But two heterosexuals who met up last week and are now calling themselves a couple only have to pay €100.

    Straightforward financial discrimination against gay people - the Irish Govt. fails us yet again.

    Don't worry, this will soon change!!>


  • Registered Users Posts: 40,814 ✭✭✭✭Annasopra


    sold wrote: »
    Don't worry, this will soon change!!>



    Actually we don't know if it will for certain - The Civil Partnership Bill does not make any provisions for social welfare legislation as these will be in separate legislation

    Perhaps an idea would be to contact your TD - you could then ask them to ask a parliamentary question as to whether this will be part of the social welfare part of the CP Bill

    It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.

    Terry Pratchet



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 67,696 Mod ✭✭✭✭L1011


    This is health legislation not social welfare, although I can't be bothered checking if its changed by the CP bill.


  • Registered Users Posts: 40,814 ✭✭✭✭Annasopra


    MYOB wrote: »
    This is health legislation not social welfare, although I can't be bothered checking if its changed by the CP bill.

    The letter attached refers to social welfare legislation for defining a spouse

    It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.

    Terry Pratchet



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,018 ✭✭✭shoegirl


    The DPS is highly discriminatory anyway as a single adult has to pay as much as a couple or family, regardless of income, before they "qualify".

    The other interesting thing about DPS is that what you spend on medication is tax deductable over a certain amount. But that is even more discriminatory as the amount you get back depends on what you pay out.

    So an asthmatic paying 100 euros a month for essential preventative medication (which can cost up to 125 a month) gets 41 euros back if they earn above the threshold but only 20 euros back if they are lower earners under the higher tax threshold.

    This effectively means that medication costs about 40% more for lower earners than it does for higher earners. Hardly a "progressive" tax system IMHO.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,722 ✭✭✭anotherlostie


    shoegirl wrote: »
    The DPS is highly discriminatory anyway as a single adult has to pay as much as a couple or family, regardless of income, before they "qualify".

    The other interesting thing about DPS is that what you spend on medication is tax deductable over a certain amount. But that is even more discriminatory as the amount you get back depends on what you pay out.

    So an asthmatic paying 100 euros a month for essential preventative medication (which can cost up to 125 a month) gets 41 euros back if they earn above the threshold but only 20 euros back if they are lower earners under the higher tax threshold.

    This effectively means that medication costs about 40% more for lower earners than it does for higher earners. Hardly a "progressive" tax system IMHO.

    This is way off topic for an LGB forum, but from this year, the tax can only be reclaimed at the marginal rate, and it is possible that the relief will be done away with altogether in the next budget.


  • Registered Users Posts: 916 ✭✭✭MicraBoy


    4red wrote: »
    snappieT: You're incorrect. According to 1995 legislation in regard to this matter "Spouse is defined as each person of a married couple who are living together or a man and woman who are not married to each other but who are cohabiting as man and wife." See attached letter from the Dept. Health & Children outlining same. Or call the Dept. Health helpline on 1850 24 1850 and say you would like to apply for the scheme as a gay couple, and again as a cohabiting straight couple. Let us know how you get on...

    Micraboy: Civil partnership is your friend, ay? It hasn't been enacted yet.

    So glad you are here to state the bleeding obvious. My point was thatCivil Partnership is on the way and I would expect it to have the knock on effect of changing rules like this. Not that I don't think it's outrageous that a relationship of 12 years should fall outside this scheme. This is one of the reasons why no matter how far Civil partnership falls short of the real deal, it is progress.

    A spouse is a ‘husband or wife or a man or a woman who is cohabitating with a person of the opposite sex for a continuous period of not less than 3 years but is not married to that person’. Thats a quote from an article on the Mental Health Act 2001 so not sure how valid it is.

    Either way your assertion that a couple living together for a week would qualify is simply sh1t stirring. The Dept. of Social Welfare guidelines for co-habiting are fairly rigourous


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 40,814 ✭✭✭✭Annasopra


    If you look at page 116 of the bill it amends spouse in the health act 1970 to include civil partners so it seems to me that CP will infact bring this in

    http://www.oireachtas.ie/documents/bills28/bills/2009/4409/b4409d.pdf

    It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.

    Terry Pratchet



Advertisement