Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Laws on height of trees, hedging.

  • 22-10-2009 10:01pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,724 ✭✭✭


    I only have a question and am not looking for any legal advice as i know its not aloud.

    I was just wondering if anyone here can tell if me there have been any new laws introduced about restriction on the height of neighbours trees, hedging.



Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,345 ✭✭✭NUTLEY BOY


    Vanbis wrote: »
    I only have a question and am not looking for any legal advice as i know its not aloud.

    I was just wondering if anyone here can tell if me there have been any new laws introduced about restriction on the height of neighbours trees, hedging.


    Not as far as I know.

    High trees are a perpetual problem as far as light is concerned. Worse, there is no general right to light so neighbours can essentially do what they like on height and darken your house and garden without comeback. The problem is worse if the neighbour is an unreasonable sort of person.

    I believe that one property can acquire a right to light from neighbouring property by prescription if you have enjoyed that right, without break, for at least 20 years. However, that is a civil matter in which you would have to sue in nuisance.

    Otherwise, pray for a storm of unprecedented violence and hope it blows them all down - preferably in to your neighbour's property :D:D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,724 ✭✭✭Vanbis


    NUTLEY BOY wrote: »
    Not as far as I know.

    High trees are a perpetual problem as far as light is concerned. Worse, there is no general right to light so neighbours can essentially do what they like on height and darken your house and garden without comeback. The problem is worse if the neighbour is an unreasonable sort of person.

    I have tried to reason with her but she never listens and now completey ignores me and thinks i am bonkers.
    NUTLEY BOY wrote: »
    Otherwise, pray for a storm of unprecedented violence and hope it blows them all down - preferably in to your neighbour's property :D:D

    I also tried this method but 10yrs later and still no storm or damge. I think i have been very patient with her so far but i am seriously considering some drastic action.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 634 ✭✭✭jimoc


    If any part of the tree is hanging over your land then just cut down that part and hope it unbalances the trees enough to fall over.

    Failing that, drill a nice little hole into it well above head height and pour acid into it and eventually the tree will die away 'of natural causes' :)

    ***This is not legal advice, do not follow*** :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,857 ✭✭✭Reloc8


    jimoc wrote: »
    If any part of the tree is hanging over your land then just cut down that part and hope it unbalances the trees enough to fall over.

    Failing that, drill a nice little hole into it well above head height and pour acid into it and eventually the tree will die away 'of natural causes' :)

    ***This is not legal advice, do not follow*** :)

    eh yep...especially as in the latter case you could be sued for the damage to the tree and in the former case you could seriously injure someone or their property (including of course yourself). And get sued. But it would be way worse to injury someone. Or yourself. Depending.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,345 ✭✭✭NUTLEY BOY


    Reloc8 wrote: »
    eh yep...especially as in the latter case you could be sued for the damage to the tree and in the former case you could seriously injure someone or their property (including of course yourself). And get sued. But it would be way worse to injury someone. Or yourself. Depending.

    PLUS 1 !!!

    This could result in charges of criminal damage or even manslaughter if it went catastrophically wrong. Worse, if you did it deliberately, your insurance company would not cover you..........


  • Advertisement
Advertisement