Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

If everyone knew mathematics...

  • 14-10-2009 2:58pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 6,609 ✭✭✭


    ... then there would be no crime. I mean, how many scientists end up committing crimes? Exactly.


    This fine logic I overheard on the number 10 bus leaving UCD for town. No joking around, this guy was serious.

    Is it time to introduce some kind of social philosophy module into science degrees?


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 485 ✭✭blackbetty69


    what about joe bloggs who goes in to rob a bank?? sure, hes no mathematician, but hes well able to calculate how much he robbed, so he knows a little maths at least... which contradicts your statement


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,609 ✭✭✭Flamed Diving


    what about joe bloggs who goes in to rob a bank?? sure, hes no mathematician, but hes well able to calculate how much he robbed, so he knows a little maths at least... which contradicts your statement

    My statement?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,943 ✭✭✭Burning Eclipse


    what about joe bloggs who goes in to rob a bank?? sure, hes no mathematician, but hes well able to calculate how much he robbed, so he knows a little maths at least... which contradicts your statement

    I'd say read the OP again...

    And yes, all college courses need some level of diversity!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,481 ✭✭✭Fremen


    Easy way to refute that logic.
    Show him you can solve a constant-coefficient second order ordinary differential equation, then *BAM*. Fork in the eye.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,164 ✭✭✭cavedave


    How much would crime decrease?

    Lets say mathematicians have higher IQ's than the average person. This seems backed up by evidence here and here. This is not about IQ having any particular meaning other then how it correlates with crime.

    There is data on how IQ correlates to violent crime here. It is quite possible that the IQ crime correlation is actually to do with the affluencing inducing the Flynn effect.

    So say everyones IQ increased two standard deviations how much would violent crime go down?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,481 ✭✭✭Fremen


    cavedave wrote: »
    So say everyones IQ increased two standard deviations how much would violent crime go down?

    You're neglecting the "Evil genius peak". As IQ rises above 170 or so, so does the proclivity to build doomsday devices in massive underground fortresses guarded by henchmen who can't shoot straight.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,038 ✭✭✭sponsoredwalk


    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sergey_Degayev
    http://www.newstatesman.com/200305120044

    I guess this person on the bus didn't do his math's when he proclaimed this golden nugget of "truth".

    + we all know Einstein invented the bomb with his E=(k)mc^2...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 90 ✭✭ugliest


    Maybe it should be, if everyone studied mathematics, there'd be no crime.

    The 1337 mathematicians would use their power to rise to the top! That and an awful lot of mathematicians aren't that power hungry. Oftentimes they're busy thinking of loftier topics. Maths can be terribly distracting. I'd say it might even out, to those who wanted power could usurp it easily.

    If everyone was busy collaboratively searching for absolute truth (we all know the answer lies in maths), then we would be far too busy for wards and the likes. Also, everyone would be relatively poor, but happy.

    For that to happen though, mathematicians must indeed rule the world, and to do that, we must people as many wmd's as possible. To the laboratories my brethren! We must build a utopia!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 61 ✭✭hinduhamster


    ......they would carry the 1.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,038 ✭✭✭sponsoredwalk


    Lol sounds a lot like Plato talking about the philosopher kings of Ancient Greece. Personally I await a contemporary cosmopolitan Diogenese of Sinope to restore balance to the world, Idk if he was a Geometer tho...


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,202 ✭✭✭✭Pherekydes


    + we all know Einstein invented the bomb with his E=(k)mc^2...

    The bomb was invented long before Einstein drew breath. Unless of course you're referring to the atomic bomb, but he didn't invent that either.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,609 ✭✭✭Flamed Diving


    Pherekydes wrote: »
    The bomb was invented long before Einstein drew breath. Unless of course you're referring to the atomic bomb, but he didn't invent that either.

    If you are going to blame Einstein, you may as well blame the Curies...

    :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,202 ✭✭✭✭Pherekydes


    If you are going to blame Einstein, you may as well blame the Curies...

    :rolleyes:

    Your rolleyes are misplaced. The other poster was blaming Einstein.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,038 ✭✭✭sponsoredwalk


    Truth be told Feynman did it. Or was it the nazi's? No I think it was the Chineese and their gunpowder lol... But no, it was e=mc^2, definitely His fault... Why couldn't he NOT be a mathematician, we'd all be out of this mess and be taugth philosophy and hyperbolic geometry by a bus-philosopher-power-usurping-ubermansch...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,609 ✭✭✭Flamed Diving


    Pherekydes wrote: »
    Your rolleyes are misplaced.

    No, only in your head.
    Pherekydes wrote: »
    The other poster was blaming Einstein.

    I knew that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,202 ✭✭✭✭Pherekydes


    I knew that.

    If that was the case then why quote me? :rolleyes:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,609 ✭✭✭Flamed Diving


    Pherekydes wrote: »
    If that was the case then why quote me? :rolleyes:

    I was seconding what you were saying.

    Pherekydes = must... think... harder...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,202 ✭✭✭✭Pherekydes


    I was seconding what you were saying.

    Pherekydes = must... think... harder...

    Back me up by quoting my post and adding rolleyes at the end? LOL

    Flamed Diving = must stop flaming and diving and learn how to quote the right poster.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,609 ✭✭✭Flamed Diving


    Pherekydes wrote: »
    Back me up by quoting my post and adding rolleyes at the end? LOL

    Flamed Diving = must stop flaming and diving and learn how to quote the right poster.

    I really don't have time for childrens games. Please stop.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,202 ✭✭✭✭Pherekydes


    I really don't have time for childrens games. Please stop.

    I did stop with my last post. You started again. Children's games? LOL


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,038 ✭✭✭sponsoredwalk


    I guess you two aren't mathematician then...



    (don't quote me on it;))


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,202 ✭✭✭✭Pherekydes


    I guess you two aren't mathematician then...

    Don't guess...




    P.S. We're not the one mathematician if that's what you're trying to say.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,081 ✭✭✭LeixlipRed


    Flamed Diving, infracted for flaming. Pherekydes you should know better, just ignore him.


Advertisement