If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)

Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Should Punk still be champion?

DM_7 · 2009-10-08 21:05:13

So Taker is now champ. But Why? He's not well enough to wrestle, wwe is a global brand and needs a guy in a position to be a full timer as champ. Taker is an established attraction without the title. Punk on the other hand has excelled on TV since he was champ. His feud with Jeff was great. His wrestling ability was often…

08-10-2009 9:05pm

#1

DM_7

Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 18,520 Mod ✭✭✭✭

Join Date: March 2009

Posts: 18114

So Taker is now champ. But Why?

He's not well enough to wrestle, wwe is a global brand and needs a guy in a position to be a full timer as champ. Taker is an established attraction without the title.

Punk on the other hand has excelled on TV since he was champ. His feud with Jeff was great. His wrestling ability was often showcased in WWE but he was really showing his talking skills, even Vinny Mc was praising that quality lately. So I don't get why they have taken the title off him. Regardless of what rumours are out about his "Attitude" his work deserved more than a loss to an unfit taker.

What do you all think?

Failed to load the poll.

2