Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

respect the yes vote

  • 03-10-2009 12:55am
    #1
    utick
    Closed Accounts Posts: 562 ✭✭✭


    lets respect the yes vote by demanding a 3rd referendum


Comments

  • #2
    marco_polo
    Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 10,088 Mod ✭✭✭✭marco_polo


    Fail


  • #3
    kryogen
    Closed Accounts Posts: 25,953 ✭✭✭✭kryogen


    I actually like the idea of a best 2 out of 3, i mean if they get a re match why shouldnt we! :p


  • #4
    Rb
    Closed Accounts Posts: 14,277 ✭✭✭✭Rb


    That wouldn't be respecting or disrespecting the vote but given that there wouldn't be sufficient reason for a third referendum, should the count tomorrow actually yield a Yes result, such a proposition would merely be retarded.


  • #5
    imeddyhobbs
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,026 ✭✭✭imeddyhobbs


    Yea..best a 3..why not?


  • #6
    MikeC101
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,707 ✭✭✭MikeC101


    Sure. As soon as the government of the day wants another referendum, I'll happily go and vote, and won't whine about it not being democratic.

    Plus, the votes haven't even been counted yet, so you're a little ahead of yourself. Might be a surprise yet.


  • Advertisement
  • #7
    utick
    Closed Accounts Posts: 562 ✭✭✭utick


    Rb wrote: »
    That wouldn't be respecting or disrespecting the vote but given that there wouldn't be sufficient reason for a third referendum, should the count tomorrow actually yield a Yes result, such a proposition would merely be retarded.


    ok well we will run a poll showing the vast majority didnt understand the treaty again so the reason would be just as sufficient as the first re-run


  • #8
    Rb
    Closed Accounts Posts: 14,277 ✭✭✭✭Rb


    imeddyhobbs wrote: »
    Yea..best a 3..why not?
    You should probably stick to building bridges tbh, political discussion really doesn't seem to be your thing.


  • #9
    Rb
    Closed Accounts Posts: 14,277 ✭✭✭✭Rb


    utick wrote: »
    ok well we will run a poll showing the vast majority didnt understand the treaty again so the reason would be just as sufficient as the first re-run
    That would require people on the Yes side actually not understanding what they were voting on, which I've personally yet to witness.

    Unless by "run" you're suggesting the Government made it up last time, and that we should "do so" again this time. In which case, off to the Conspiracy Theory forum with you.


  • #10
    MikeC101
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,707 ✭✭✭MikeC101


    utick wrote: »
    ok well we will run a poll showing the vast majority didnt understand the treaty again so the reason would be just as sufficient as the first re-run

    No problem with that. Go for it! Maybe Declan will give you some cash towards it? Then of course, the government would have to propose it...assuming they do - let's go for it.


  • #11
    PaulieD
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 932 ✭✭✭PaulieD


    Maybe we can wait until the ballot boxes have been opened before calling this? Sure, it does look ominous for the No side, but the traitors havent won yet.


  • Advertisement
  • #12
    Rb
    Closed Accounts Posts: 14,277 ✭✭✭✭Rb


    PaulieD wrote: »
    Maybe we can wait until the ballot boxes have been opened before calling this? Sure, it does look ominous for the No side, but the traitors havent won yet.
    Traitors? Of what?


  • #13
    MikeC101
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,707 ✭✭✭MikeC101


    PaulieD wrote: »
    Maybe we can wait until the ballot boxes have been opened before calling this? Sure, it does look ominous for the No side, but the traitors havent won yet.

    Traitors and *Slavs* Paulie, don't forget the Slavs.


  • #14
    MikeC101
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,707 ✭✭✭MikeC101


    Rb wrote: »
    Traitors? Of what?

    Traitors to Ireland! Or Democracy. Or 1916, or whatever the current most emotive thing is. Heck, let's go with all of the above!


  • #15
    marco_polo
    Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 10,088 Mod ✭✭✭✭marco_polo


    utick wrote: »
    ok well we will run a poll showing the vast majority didnt understand the treaty again so the reason would be just as sufficient as the first re-run

    I hear this polling organisation are good.

    This guy is highly recomended as well


  • #16
    imeddyhobbs
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,026 ✭✭✭imeddyhobbs


    MikeC101 wrote: »
    Sure. As soon as the government of the day wants another referendum, I'll happily go and vote, and won't whine about it not being democratic.

    Plus, the votes haven't even been counted yet, so you're a little ahead of yourself. Might be a surprise yet.

    Its over man,It's a yes vote.

    There is no democracy and there will be no re–run when the result satisfys the masters


  • #17
    marco_polo
    Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 10,088 Mod ✭✭✭✭marco_polo


    imeddyhobbs wrote: »
    Its over man,It's a yes vote.

    There is no democracy and there will be no re–run when the result satisfys the masters


    Really, I voted just this very evening, has it been cancelled?


  • #18
    Rb
    Closed Accounts Posts: 14,277 ✭✭✭✭Rb


    marco_polo wrote: »
    Really, I voted just this very evening, has it been cancelled?
    It's only democratic if "imeddyhobbs", the bridge construction worker, says it's democratic.

    Get it?


  • #19
    poisonated
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,277 ✭✭✭poisonated


    you got my hopes up with the thread title:D.When are the results really coming out?


  • #20
    kryogen
    Closed Accounts Posts: 25,953 ✭✭✭✭kryogen


    Rb wrote: »
    It's only democratic if "imeddyhobbs", the bridge construction worker, says it's democratic.

    Get it?


    curious here, what have you got against bridge construction workers?


  • #21
    imeddyhobbs
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,026 ✭✭✭imeddyhobbs


    marco_polo wrote: »
    Really, I voted just this very evening, has it been cancelled?

    My vote was,I voted no last year on this document


  • Advertisement
  • #22
    PaulieD
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 932 ✭✭✭PaulieD


    Rb wrote: »
    It's only democratic if "imeddyhobbs", the bridge construction worker, says it's democratic.

    Get it?

    No. It is only over when we give the right answer. If indeed the result tomorrow is a Yes vote, it is over. If we vote No, we will be voting once again. No doubt about that what so ever.

    Is that democracy?


  • #23
    PaulieD
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 932 ✭✭✭PaulieD


    Rb wrote: »
    Traitors? Of what?

    The Irish nation.


  • #24
    PaulieD
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 932 ✭✭✭PaulieD


    MikeC101 wrote: »
    Traitors and *Slavs* Paulie, don't forget the Slavs.

    Frankly, MikeC, I couldnt give a damn about the slavs.:)


  • #25
    MikeC101
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,707 ✭✭✭MikeC101


    imeddyhobbs wrote: »
    My vote was,I voted no last year on this document

    What, did you forget to vote this time around then?


  • #26
    Rb
    Closed Accounts Posts: 14,277 ✭✭✭✭Rb


    kryogen wrote: »
    curious here, what have you got against bridge construction workers?

    Nothing.
    PaulieD wrote: »
    No. It is only over when we give the right answer. If indeed the result tomorrow is a Yes vote, it is over. If we vote No, we will be voting once again. No doubt about that what so ever.

    Is that democracy?

    Yes, it is, but it's completely lost on you.


  • #27
    artanevilla
    Moderators, Education Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,974 Mod ✭✭✭✭artanevilla


    There's never going to be another referendum on Europe again anyway.


  • #28
    Rb
    Closed Accounts Posts: 14,277 ✭✭✭✭Rb


    PaulieD wrote: »
    The Irish nation.
    Very amusing.

    Yes, those who voted in favour of a good treaty for Ireland and Europe are the traitors, not the ones trying to lead Ireland into a very bad position within the EU, flanked by a bunch of lunatic organisations such as Coir.

    They really are the traitors, well done, you've clearly shown your understanding of the situation (i.e sweet fuck all) and hopefully, for the good of democracy you either didn't vote or in some way spoiled it.


  • #29
    MikeC101
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,707 ✭✭✭MikeC101


    PaulieD wrote: »
    Frankly, MikeC, I couldnt give a damn about the slavs.:)

    Odd, the impression I was getting was that you cared a lot about the slavs. Specifically, about them not voting, be they citizens or not.


  • #30
    PaulieD
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 932 ✭✭✭PaulieD


    Rb wrote: »
    Yes, it is, but it's completely lost on you.

    Let me get this straight, if we vote No and are forced to vote again, thats democratic? But if we vote Yes there should definitely be no re-run of Lisbon?


  • Advertisement
  • #31
    Rb
    Closed Accounts Posts: 14,277 ✭✭✭✭Rb


    artanevilla wrote: »
    There's never going to be another referendum on Europe again anyway.
    I think I can hear the Super State tanks rolling into Dublin City Centre as we speak!!!


  • #32
    PaulieD
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 932 ✭✭✭PaulieD


    MikeC101 wrote: »
    Odd, the impression I was getting was that you cared a lot about the slavs. Specifically, about them not voting, be they citizens or not.

    Yes, as it is illegal and against the constitution.


  • #33
    kryogen
    Closed Accounts Posts: 25,953 ✭✭✭✭kryogen


    Rb wrote: »
    Nothing.




    why do you make a couple of references to it then? cant see what someones occupation has to do with the legitimacy of their opinion


  • #34
    MikeC101
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,707 ✭✭✭MikeC101


    PaulieD wrote: »
    Let me get this straight, if we vote No and are forced to vote again, thats democratic? But if we vote Yes there should definitely be no re-run of Lisbon?


    If we vote Yes, and the democratically elected government decides to have another re-run, it's democratic, and I'll vote again with no complaints.

    Note, it's still an if, you're getting awfully ahead of yourselves on the vote count.


  • #35
    Rb
    Closed Accounts Posts: 14,277 ✭✭✭✭Rb


    PaulieD wrote: »
    Let me get this straight, if we vote No and are forced to vote again, thats democratic? But if we vote Yes there should definitely be no re-run of Lisbon?
    Wait, did someone drag you to the polling station tonight? Who forced you to vote on this?

    I didn't see anyone being forced, in fact from what I saw most were making their way freely to the polling station. Some, the very elderly, needed a helping hand though but I didn't get the impression that they were there not out of their own choice.

    Unless the lizard men NWO leaders are using mind control now, is that it?


  • #36
    PaulieD
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 932 ✭✭✭PaulieD


    kryogen wrote: »
    why do you make a couple of references to it then? cant see what someones occupation has to do with the legitimacy of their opinion

    The Yes side are showing their true colours, RB should apologise for that snobbish remark.


  • Advertisement
  • #37
    MikeC101
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,707 ✭✭✭MikeC101


    PaulieD wrote: »
    Yes, as it is illegal and against the constitution.

    Not if they're Irish citizens.


  • #38
    imeddyhobbs
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,026 ✭✭✭imeddyhobbs


    Rb wrote: »
    It's only democratic if "imeddyhobbs", the bridge construction worker, says it's democratic.

    Get it?

    It is astounding how much people ignore our original vote on this treaty.And by the way i work in plan and design in bridges,next year you will be able to facilitate in the use of more than 100 new bridges as part of our national infrastructure


  • #39
    PaulieD
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 932 ✭✭✭PaulieD


    Rb wrote: »
    Wait, did someone drag you to the polling station tonight? Who forced you to vote on this?

    I didn't see anyone being forced, in fact from what I saw most were making their way freely to the polling station.

    Unless the lizard men NWO leaders are using mind control now, is that it?

    Stop with the smears and answer my question.


  • #40
    marco_polo
    Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 10,088 Mod ✭✭✭✭marco_polo


    I must do up a poster of a crying child later.

    No Childrens Rights Referendum. Tough Sh*t.


  • #41
    kryogen
    Closed Accounts Posts: 25,953 ✭✭✭✭kryogen


    Rb wrote: »
    Wait, did someone drag you to the polling station tonight? Who forced you to vote on this?

    I didn't see anyone being forced, in fact from what I saw most were making their way freely to the polling station.

    Unless the lizard men NWO leaders are using mind control now, is that it?


    why cant you make a point without an attempt to ridicule aswell?


  • Advertisement
  • #42
    Scofflaw
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,283 ✭✭✭✭Scofflaw


    This wasn't a great thread to start off with, but now its turning ugly to boot. Cheer up, people, and be nice - we're all still part of the same demos.

    moderately,
    Scofflaw


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement