Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Could be X-Ray machines for planes next

  • 26-09-2009 4:41am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,770 ✭✭✭


    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/8276016.stm

    Fears over 'internal' terror bomb

    Security and intelligence experts are deeply worried by a new development in suicide bombing, the BBC has learned.
    It has emerged that an al-Qaeda bomber who died last month while trying to blow up a Saudi prince in Jeddah had hidden the explosives inside his body.
    Only the attacker died, but it is feared that the new development could be copied by others.
    Experts say it could have implications for airport security, rendering traditional metal detectors "useless".
    Last month's bombing left people wondering how one of the most wanted al-Qaeda operatives in Saudi Arabia could get so close to the prince in charge of counter-terrorism that he was able to blow himself up in the same room.
    Western forensic investigators think they have the answer, and it is worrying them profoundly.
    Peter Neuman of Kings College London says the case will be studied intensively, and that there are "tremendous implications for airport security with the potential of making it even more complicated to get on to your plane".
    "If it really is true that the metal detectors couldn't detect this person's hidden explosive device, that would mean that the metal detectors as they currently exist in airports are pretty much useless," he said.
    The bomber was a Saudi al-Qaeda fugitive who said he wanted to give himself up to the prince in person.
    The prince took him at his word and gave him safe passage to his palace.
    But there, once he got next to his target, the bomb inside him was detonated.
    Miraculously the prince survived with minor injuries, but footage emerging this week shows a sizeable crater in the concrete floor and the bomber's body blown in half.
    It is believed the force of the blast went downwards which is why only the bomber died.

    Bit of a nightmare this. Possibly a new idea/technology they were saving this bomb for a big target (Saudi Prince in charge of counter terrorism)

    Would love to know the details of how it got around a metal detector, hoping he was perhaps stripsearched and therefore they never bothered with the scan. Otherwise I really don't want to think about the implications for air travel.


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,049 ✭✭✭✭murphaph


    Bit of a nightmare this. Possibly a new idea/technology they were saving this bomb for a big target (Saudi Prince in charge of counter terrorism)

    Would love to know the details of how it got around a metal detector, hoping he was perhaps stripsearched and therefore they never bothered with the scan. Otherwise I really don't want to think about the implications for air travel.
    Metal detectors can detect internal pieces of metal, just not sure how big they have to be (some people with metal limb replacements/plates get stopped)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,262 ✭✭✭✭Joey the lips


    I have plates. I am always stopped and s/he uses the want thing. I imagine I will be x rayed if this continues.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,770 ✭✭✭Bottle_of_Smoke


    murphaph wrote: »
    Metal detectors can detect internal pieces of metal, just not sure how big they have to be (some people with metal limb replacements/plates get stopped)

    that's what i'm thinking, so i don't know how this guy got past the scanner. perhaps a new type of detonator, which could be frightening


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,729 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    And you know TSA will do it better than the rest - cavity searches if you have too much iron in your diet :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,443 ✭✭✭✭bonkey


    that's what i'm thinking, so i don't know how this guy got past the scanner. perhaps a new type of detonator, which could be frightening

    If there's a new type of detonator, then it doesn't need to be inside the body.

    I dunno...the story smacks of journalist sensationalism to me, mixed with a dose of the type of hyperbole we've seen with any "airport security threat" issue in the last 8 years.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,784 ✭✭✭Dirk Gently


    murphaph wrote: »
    Metal detectors can detect internal pieces of metal, just not sure how big they have to be (some people with metal limb replacements/plates get stopped)
    I have a couple of plates in my arm but they don't set off the metal detectors.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,819 ✭✭✭✭peasant


    footage emerging this week shows a sizeable crater in the concrete floor and the bomber's body blown in half.
    It is believed the force of the blast went downwards which is why only the bomber died.

    This really should be in AH ...they'd have a field day :D


  • Posts: 17,378 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    peasant wrote: »
    This really should be in AH ...they'd have a field day :D
    we already did :pac:


Advertisement