Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

HIV vaccine 'reduces infection'

  • 24-09-2009 7:52pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,770 ✭✭✭


    An experimental HIV vaccine has for the first time cut the risk of infection, researchers say.
    The vaccine - a combination of two earlier experimental vaccines - was given to 16,000 people in Thailand, in the largest ever such vaccine trial.
    Researchers found that it reduced by nearly a third the risk of contracting HIV, the virus that leads to Aids.
    It has been hailed as a significant, scientific breakthrough, but a global vaccine is still some way off.
    The study was carried out by the US army and the Thai government over seven years on volunteers - all HIV-negative men and women aged between 18 and 30 - in parts of Thailand.....
    .....
    ...Participants were tested for HIV infection every six months for three years.
    The results found that the chances of catching HIV were 31.2% less for those who had taken the vaccine - with 74 people who did not get the vaccine infected and 51 of the vaccinated group infected.
    The vaccine is based on B and E strains of HIV that most commonly circulate in Thailand not the C strain which predominates in Africa.

    This seem significant to anyone? the difference in numbers appears tiny and probably down to chance.

    It doesn't say if the groups were average citizens or high risk groups which is a bit annoying.


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,778 ✭✭✭tallaght01


    You'd need to see the paper to work out whether the trial was powered to detect that kind of difference in the groups. The lower the baseline incidence, the more people you need to detect differences in the groups.
    You don't have a reference, do you?

    I'm sure a HIV vaccine is only a matter of time. But I just want to know if I'm going to be out of work sooner rather than later, a I'm doing a HIV sub-specialty! :P


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 909 ✭✭✭Captain Furball


    tallaght01 wrote: »
    You'd need to see the paper to work out whether the trial was powered to detect that kind of difference in the groups. The lower the baseline incidence, the more people you need to detect differences in the groups.
    You don't have a reference, do you?

    I'm sure a HIV vaccine is only a matter of time. But I just want to know if I'm going to e out of work sooner rather than later, a I'm doing a HIV sub-specialty! :P

    <conspiracies theories stuff edited out by tallaght01>


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,846 ✭✭✭✭eth0_


    When I heard about this study on the news it made me feel really uncomfortable. It sounds ethically dubious, no?

    Let the placebo group think they've had a HIV vaccine and they may become more sexually reckless and could end up contracting the HIV virus as a result...!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,778 ✭✭✭tallaght01


    The placebo group don't think they are getting a HIV vaccine. They know it's experimental, and that they mightn't even get anything.

    I know when I consent people for a simple swine flu vaccine trial, where they also get randomised, the consent lasts about 45 mins. These trials usually have sexual health counselling running concurrently.

    Plus risk in HIV is more complex than that. For example, we know circumcision provides significant protection for males from HIV infection. BUt there has never been any evidence that once these guys are circumcised, they engage in more risky behaviour.

    Most HIV infection occurs in women (though that's not the case in Thailand). These women usually don't have much of a say in their risk profile. If your husband or boyfriend wants sex without a condom, then that's what happens. For a huge proportion of HIV sufferers, their only risk factor is being a woman in a relationship with a man.

    There's lots of thoughts about risk. But it seems sexual health risk doesn't vary too much within the same individual. If you're a guy in Thailand who likes to have unprotected sex, then that's what you'll do if you get the chance. It's not an evaluation each time you have sex. It's a behavioural trait. There's no great evidence of that from a psych point of view, but the epidemiological evidence suggests that's the case.

    So, I would be very surprised if this trial altered the risk profile of anyone who was enrolled.

    But it will be interesting to see it. The paper hasn't been published yet. BUt they're presenting at a European conference soon.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,770 ✭✭✭Bottle_of_Smoke


    Sorry, never included link for article - http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/8272113.stm


  • Advertisement
Advertisement