costs and sub judice in the Carroll case-

Carawaystick

I was wondering when the sub judice rule finishes for a case. Is it when the judgement is given - no examinership; or when the judgement is actually published giving reasons; or even after if there is time to lodge a appeal.

Then in the case of a creditor trying to stop an examiner being appointed would the costs be awarded against the zoe group or would it be each pay their own or how do these things go.

If zoe is liquidated, before the costs are decided, then are acc's legal team - assuming they are awarded costs in the position of creditors like al the rest?


Or more generally how are the costs decided and actually paid when companies are facing examinership/receivership/liquidators etc.
If a company takes on a good( read expensive) legal team and loose will the lawyers be left in line with the other creditors
or are you forced to get less expensive legal team and reduce the likelihood of succeeding in a good outcome.

Tom Young

Read Order 75 - for a costs explanation, re. Examiners. Sub Judice is somewhat different in this context. This is a petition heard in open court. I think I had a thread with you on that before.