Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Genbukan ninpo for self defense?

  • 02-09-2009 11:09am
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 370 ✭✭


    http://www.genbukan.ie/ninpo.html

    Has anyone any experience of this for self defence. Unusually they do not allow anyone to watch a training session


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 158 ✭✭YamaMotoYama


    RLJ wrote: »
    http://www.genbukan.ie/ninpo.html

    Has anyone any experience of this for self defence. Unusually they do not allow anyone to watch a training session

    Do you have to sign up before they let you see the set up?!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 98 ✭✭Gorman


    RLJ wrote: »
    http://www.genbukan.ie/ninpo.html

    Has anyone any experience of this for self defence. Unusually they do not allow anyone to watch a training session

    If they won't let you watch a class Beware

    Also if your main interest is self defense this is probably not for you. They say on the site that there are no competitions etc, because the art was originally developed for the battlefield - another Beware


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 370 ✭✭RLJ


    Do you have to sign up before they let you see the set up?!
    according to the site one has to train one cannot watch. i was not talking to them tho


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 370 ✭✭RLJ


    They say on the site that there are no competitions etc, because the art was originally developed for the battlefield
    Is that not a plus as self defence is a battle?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 158 ✭✭YamaMotoYama


    RLJ wrote: »
    Is that not a plus as self defence is a battle?

    Not really... It sounds exotic and mystic but if its a closed book to you before you sign up then I'd be very wary.

    The theory of how to defend yourself and actually doing it are very different.

    Where are you based out of?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 98 ✭✭Gorman


    RLJ wrote: »
    Is that not a plus as self defence is a battle?

    think about it this way, would you take my word for it if I told you I could teach you to swim, if I never actually got in to the water?

    You would ask me at the very least to show you some proof that I actually swam.

    Unless these guys are going at it in the battle fields across the world - they are essentially playing pretend.

    For self defence you must train in an environment where people fully resist and know whats coming.

    Boxer, kickboxers spar
    judo guys must do randori
    wrestlers have to wrestle
    bjj guy must roll

    try a few clubs and see what suits you best.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,163 ✭✭✭✭Boston


    This is the martial art. I see nothing there that I haven't seen elsewhere. It all seems a little strange tbh.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31 30rock


    The Genbukan is an off shout of the Bujinkan. So the curriculum is based on Medievel Japanese Bujutsu. Not all of the techinques will translate onto the street and as others have said there probably is little or no sparring certainly not in the regular classes. If of course you still have an interest you could always cross train and Boxing would good complement or any other stricking art.

    Just my thoughts
    James


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,163 ✭✭✭✭Boston


    I'll go out on a limb here and controversially say that none of the techniques will translate without prior sparring practice.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,534 ✭✭✭FruitLover


    RLJ wrote: »
    Unusually they do not allow anyone to watch a training session

    Do they absolutely not let you see anything before you've joined up, or is it a case of "ah, sure if you want to watch, you may as well get your arse in the class"?

    If it's the latter, it's actually a good idea IMO.
    (If it's the former, run away)


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1 cooper2


    My name is Keith Cooper and I have trained in mma in the Straight Blast Gym in Dublin for aproximately 1 year between 2002-2003. I have also trained bjj and a variety of other contact sports. I currently train in the Genbukan in Navan.
    I would like to dispel some misconceptions concerning the Genbukan that have arisen on this forum.

    Quote "If they won't let you watch a class Beware"

    1. You do not watch a lesson because you are encouraged to take part in the class from the very beginning. There are no registration fees or sign up for anything until you have trained for at least 2-3 months. This gives you plenty of time to decide whether the art is for you or not. It also allows you first hand experience of the art.
    The scope of knowledge transmitted through the Genbukan teachings cannot be seen in just one lesson. Therefore, 2-3 months training will allow a beginner time to experience the art and decide if it is for them. It also discourages insincere people from similar traditions who have no real interest in joining the Genbukan.

    Quote "They say on the site that there are no competitions etc, because the art was originally developed for the battlefield"

    2. If you read the quote carefully it says the art was originally developed for the battlefield. The traditions in the Genbukan are studied and trained in the traditional patterns passed on through history. Patterns that were proven and survived real situations. The old schools of Japanese budo did not keep anything that did not work so these techniques have been tried and tested. As in many martial arts there are several Genbukan students and instructors that have been involved in real life threatening situations both as civilians and professionally as members of the armed forces, law enforcement officers, SWAT and security advisers in warzones. This is not exclusive to the Genbukan but serves to show as an example that an expanse of experience is necessary to truly understand our reasons for training in our respective arts.

    Quote
    "Boxer, kickboxers spar
    judo guys must do randori
    wrestlers have to wrestle
    bjj guy must roll"

    3. There are 3 sparring systems in the Genbukan.
    Jujutsu randori (similar to Judo randori) the exception being in the type of kumiuchi.
    Fukuro shinai jutsu (sparring with shinai's).
    Tanto sabaki (knife sparring). Heavy wooden training knives are used for effect. When you train with a plastic or light knife you can know your hit but it doesn't really sink in. The heavy wooden knives often connect with bones etc. and hurt. This makes you aware that you have actually been cut. The attacks are not preplanned and are as real as possible where the attacker can cut as wildly and unrelenting as he wishes. The defender is unarmed. There is no situation in a real fight where you know what is coming.

    "In a real situation, the attacker may be heartless or crazy, so they have no need for rules or compassion. So it is useless for us to say, "don't do it" or "please stop", as they will not listen." - Grandmaster Shoto Tanemura.

    Because the Genbukan is so huge in scope you may have to train for a long time before you see any of this or you may happen upon a lesson where this is covered. The reason that sparring is not practicised every week is because it leads to a false understanding that sparring alone is the be all and end all of self defence. It is important but not the only answer to training.

    Quote "The Genbukan is an off shout of the Bujinkan."

    4. There is a common misconception that because we share a common history in some of the traditions with the Bujinkan that everything is the same.
    But we have completely different schools and our training methods are reflected through each of these traditions. Our training methods even within those schools that have a shared history is very different.
    We are not an off shoot of the Bujinkan as this implies a continuation of similarity. We are a completely separate organisation that trains under our teacher Grandmaster Shoto Tanemura.

    We respect all martial arts, traditional or otherwise and normally do not get involved in discussions as we feel it is better to train and learn through experience. As you can see from my response that a complete misconception had been drawn from assumptions rather than actually knowing the Genbukan and our traditions.

    I hope that this clears everything up and answers the original question. I apologise in advance for not taking part further on the forum as I feel that 99% of discussions like this always come to a dead end and are never really resolved.

    Thank you all for your input and enjoy your training.

    Respectfully, Keith.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 101 ✭✭mugs1


    cooper2 wrote: »
    My name is Keith Cooper and I have trained in mma in the Straight Blast Gym in Dublin for aproximately 1 year between 2002-2003. I have also trained bjj and a variety of other contact sports. I currently train in the Genbukan in Navan.
    I would like to dispel some misconceptions concerning the Genbukan that have arisen on this forum.

    Quote "If they won't let you watch a class Beware"

    1. You do not watch a lesson because you are encouraged to take part in the class from the very beginning. There are no registration fees or sign up for anything until you have trained for at least 2-3 months. This gives you plenty of time to decide whether the art is for you or not. It also allows you first hand experience of the art.
    The scope of knowledge transmitted through the Genbukan teachings cannot be seen in just one lesson. Therefore, 2-3 months training will allow a beginner time to experience the art and decide if it is for them. It also discourages insincere people from similar traditions who have no real interest in joining the Genbukan.

    Quote "They say on the site that there are no competitions etc, because the art was originally developed for the battlefield"

    2. If you read the quote carefully it says the art was originally developed for the battlefield. The traditions in the Genbukan are studied and trained in the traditional patterns passed on through history. Patterns that were proven and survived real situations. The old schools of Japanese budo did not keep anything that did not work so these techniques have been tried and tested. As in many martial arts there are several Genbukan students and instructors that have been involved in real life threatening situations both as civilians and professionally as members of the armed forces, law enforcement officers, SWAT and security advisers in warzones. This is not exclusive to the Genbukan but serves to show as an example that an expanse of experience is necessary to truly understand our reasons for training in our respective arts.

    Quote
    "Boxer, kickboxers spar
    judo guys must do randori
    wrestlers have to wrestle
    bjj guy must roll"

    3. There are 3 sparring systems in the Genbukan.
    Jujutsu randori (similar to Judo randori) the exception being in the type of kumiuchi.
    Fukuro shinai jutsu (sparring with shinai's).
    Tanto sabaki (knife sparring). Heavy wooden training knives are used for effect. When you train with a plastic or light knife you can know your hit but it doesn't really sink in. The heavy wooden knives often connect with bones etc. and hurt. This makes you aware that you have actually been cut. The attacks are not preplanned and are as real as possible where the attacker can cut as wildly and unrelenting as he wishes. The defender is unarmed. There is no situation in a real fight where you know what is coming.

    "In a real situation, the attacker may be heartless or crazy, so they have no need for rules or compassion. So it is useless for us to say, "don't do it" or "please stop", as they will not listen." - Grandmaster Shoto Tanemura.

    Because the Genbukan is so huge in scope you may have to train for a long time before you see any of this or you may happen upon a lesson where this is covered. The reason that sparring is not practicised every week is because it leads to a false understanding that sparring alone is the be all and end all of self defence. It is important but not the only answer to training.

    Quote "The Genbukan is an off shout of the Bujinkan."

    4. There is a common misconception that because we share a common history in some of the traditions with the Bujinkan that everything is the same.
    But we have completely different schools and our training methods are reflected through each of these traditions. Our training methods even within those schools that have a shared history is very different.
    We are not an off shoot of the Bujinkan as this implies a continuation of similarity. We are a completely separate organisation that trains under our teacher Grandmaster Shoto Tanemura.

    We respect all martial arts, traditional or otherwise and normally do not get involved in discussions as we feel it is better to train and learn through experience. As you can see from my response that a complete misconception had been drawn from assumptions rather than actually knowing the Genbukan and our traditions.

    I hope that this clears everything up and answers the original question. I apologise in advance for not taking part further on the forum as I feel that 99% of discussions like this always come to a dead end and are never really resolved.

    Thank you all for your input and enjoy your training.

    Respectfully, Keith.

    Very good points, well made, I done a class with Genbukan a few years ago, I found them very friendly and open about their "Genuine historical budo arts" and as stated above they just encourage a new student to get involved. which a very simple google search would have revealed!!!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 805 ✭✭✭suey71


    Surely a student would need to train for a lot more than 1 1/2 hours once a week to become proficient in this art. Why train only one night per week? or in the case of the Blarney club, once per month.:confused:.

    I'm in no way knocking your style but once a week in any man's book is not enough.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,029 ✭✭✭HammerHeadGym


    cooper2 wrote: »
    Because the Genbukan is so huge in scope you may have to train for a long time before you see any of this or you may happen upon a lesson where this is covered. The reason that sparring is not practicised every week is because it leads to a false understanding that sparring alone is the be all and end all of self defence. It is important but not the only answer to training.

    I was with Genbukan for 6 years and every time I asked about sparring I was told that the beautiful Ninpo did not need to indulge in vulgar displays for the sake of the ego. It got to the point where I was told it was disrespectful of me to ask anyone to spar. I was at the same time being 'taught' how to defend against 'killing strikes' by guys who had never been in a fight in their lives.
    I now do, Muay Thai, Judo, and Bjj. And guess what? I learnt more about fighting in 6 weeks, than I did in 6 years with them. My bowing and dojo etiquette aren't up to much these days though, nor is my siiting in Seiza for hours to satisfy the sadistic impulses of my instructors.

    Feel free to PM me for some truthful insight into the Genbukan.

    @Boston, speaking from first hand experience, you are right on the money.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 622 ✭✭✭Deise Musashi


    I had a chance to train with a couple of lads from Genbukan Ninpo last Tuesday night, so I went ;)

    An hour doing rolls and breakfalls got me sweating and lightly warmed up, not used to heading for the ground of my own accord so the rolls were awkward and I've pains still from hitting the deck kind of hard and ugly :)

    We then went through some etiquette and how to do their L Stance guarding block position. I'm from a mainly TKD background so that's how I'd describe the stance. We went through a few versions of similar to one step sparring, blocking and striking as near as possible to what was shown.

    Again the TKD training kicked in and we (my brother in law and I) started doing TKD stances and breathing. Some similarities and some differences, but consistent with what I've seen in other very traditional Japanese Martial Arts.

    We then went on to do some throws from grabs, very similar to some Daito Ryu Aiki Jiu Jitsu I've been shown. Whether it was Hapkido in Tramore (well lads, esp. Quillo), Kaze Aherashi, Aikido, Prof. Clark and Paul PMA-Ire, all had the same basic structure and flavour. I like joint locking and throwing and that was what inclined me to try this art first off. The things we were shown were standard enough across most arts I've seen who do this stuff.

    The class was easy going and at times comical (me trying to roll and crashing into my Brother In Law) but also very formal with an old Japanese style to it. The lads instructing were sound and good at what they do.

    The head instructor also trains BJJ in Waterford and I've a feeling we've met before, maybe at John Kav's seminar? Really nice guy and very dedicated to his art.

    The only things I didn't like, and they are down to me heading towards old fart status at warp speed.

    Rolling, I spent a lot of time avoiding going down (Matron!) in TKD, and my body is in bits even now from impacting the ground like a sack of loosely packed shiite! I suppose I would loosen out in time but that's tough going at the start! Our first inclination would be to break the Uke's grip and smash him with digs and a good kicking, but the joint lock/control and takedown gives a very nice alternative to going ape man on a drunk Uncle or similar.

    Learning new terms. If I was doing Hapkido there would be some carryover from the Korean I know from TKD. RBSD like with Mick Coup or Lee Morrison is usually in English. I dunno if I want to embark on learning another set of words for techniques at this stage.

    I really enjoyed the time spent with the lads, I can see the attraction for learning a very formal and ancient Japanese style. I don't think it's for me though, I'm really sore after it and not in a muscular exertion kind of way!

    Our local TKD club is very sport and tournament focused right now, younger mans game, which is why I'm not there these days. I've also started to like C2 CORE Combatives and want to pursue that type of training. That is why I am looking forward to meeting Lee Morrison soonish up in Gorey (RBSD) and hopefully Yomchi will be there (TKD).

    I am still very interested in some kind of casual learning of Jiu Jitsu and Hapkido style locks and throws, must ask Paul O'Leary about that. Seems there is a Polish lad teaching Krav Maga here in town, so that's next up for a visit!


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 15,812 Mod ✭✭✭✭smacl


    Very informative and balanced reply, Deise, good work! Getting on a bit myself (44) I can totally understand looking for some good regular training without always focussing on comps, and also the gripe about yet another set of names for the techniques you half know from other styles. FWIW, Paul Moran hosted Yang Jwing Min (sp?) for an excellent day long seminar of joint locks from standing positions a couple of years back(qinna or chin na, yet another set of terms). Well worth a trip if he makes it back to these shores, though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5 ruadh74


    I was with Genbukan for 6 years and every time I asked about sparring I was told that the beautiful Ninpo did not need to indulge in vulgar displays for the sake of the ego. It got to the point where I was told it was disrespectful of me to ask anyone to spar. I was at the same time being 'taught' how to defend against 'killing strikes' by guys who had never been in a fight in their lives.
    I now do, Muay Thai, Judo, and Bjj. And guess what? I learnt more about fighting in 6 weeks, than I did in 6 years with them. My bowing and dojo etiquette aren't up to much these days though, nor is my siiting in Seiza for hours to satisfy the sadistic impulses of my instructors.

    Feel free to PM me for some truthful insight into the Genbukan.

    Hello David, Colm Fitzsimons here from the Genbukan.


    Just to reply to your post. You are not or never were a member of the Genbukan for 6 years and to claim that you were is an absolute falsehood. You were a member of Kokusai Jujutsu Renmei which is a completely separate system. You joined the Kokusai Jujutsu Renmei on 10th April, 2002 along with your instructor and the Ryo Shinto Ryu group. Your instructor was given a high level of introduction due to his previous rank with the understanding that he would learn our system over a 2 year transition period and pass on those teachings to his students. That however did not happen and the transition period extended to 4 years or more due to a lack of attendance in training through the basic grades. We have never had any problems with any other group other than with your group. Your instructor now teaches MMA www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?p=63180382.


    Therefore, and this is something I want to make absolutely clear, you did not train regularly even for the short time you were affiliated to us under a fully qualified, trained Genbukan instructor or attend regular Genbukan classes during that time.


    You eventually joined Genbukan on 20th April, 2006 and left later that same year without attending any Genbukan classes whatsoever.


    I saw you at one or maybe two seminars in Ireland when you were with the KJJR and I personally train at every class, I remember seeing you at one of them but it may have been two, I will give you the benefit of the doubt. This was during the entire time you and your group were affiliated to us.


    You had a lot of conflict with your instructor which was evident when you were in Japan with me. When we were in Japan, you tried to put some arm locks on me and when you couldn’t you kept asking me why you couldn’t put them on me, even though I was not resisting and relaxed in order to help you learn them and you were supposed to have already learnt them. I told you that you had to go and learn the patterns correctly and continue practising. You looked totally disillusioned especially after all of your previous years of martial arts training and I could understand at the time what that must have been like. Your instructor telephoned when you were in Japan to say that he did not want you to go to the instructors class because he was not there and it was one of the only times I heard our instructor swear and say “David has travelled out to Japan, can’t his teacher just let him train while he’s here?” and he got you into the instructors class. Naturally this caused some conflict between my instructor and your instructor and just added to the difficulties that were already there. So it was a Genbukan instructor helping you, something that you may not be aware of.


    You complain about sitting in Seiza which is uncomfortable and painful for some people but nobody is forced to do anything they don’t or can’t do, you have a choice, and you have free will. Some people can only sit in Seiza for a few minutes and you would complain after only a few seconds. You don’t have to sit in Seiza anymore so what are you complaining about? Get over it.


    I have trained in Brazilian Jujutsu, Karate and Wing Chun and when you join an organisation you have to obey their rules and regulations. If you don’t want to obey their rules and regulations, you simply walk out. If I joined a Judo club, I’d have to adhere to their rules without prejudice or complaint and if I didn’t like the rules I would simply move on. Training is what is important, something we make clear to all members.


    Please do not use the Genbukan as an excuse for your inability to come to terms with any previous bad experiences you have had in the martial arts even if it has a tenuous overlap into our school. You left the Genbukan shortly after your instructor and you both went completely separate ways.

    If however any Genbukan instructor has caused you concern due to differences or personal feelings then I will apologise completely on their behalf - something we are not afraid to do so we can move on and get on with our training without conflict.


    So I will reiterate clearly that you were never a member of the Genbukan for 6 years as you claim and when you did join for less than a few months you did not attend any regular Genbukan classes, and nobody ever said the flowery words you used to describe our sparring, you simply made those words up yourself.


    Read Keith Coopers post again clearly and you will see that regular attendance of classes will allow you to eventually see the full scope of Genbukan training including sparring but if you don’t attend any classes then you won’t see any.


    I am happy that you have found a martial art that suits you. I wish you a wonderful and successful martial arts career.


    Good luck for the future.


    Colm Fitzsimons,
    Nitten Dojo,
    Genbukan Ireland.

    PS: This is not a reply to the thread but to David direct. Everyone has a free and open opinion on any martial art, even if we don’t like what is said about our respective arts but the truth is important and clarity is paramount in stating facts.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 754 ✭✭✭ryoishin


    Ive nothing to add to this conversation except the Genbukan is a very well run organisation with a very high standard of traditional budo. If you re after traditional training you could do far worse.

    Self defence depends on the instructor, some focus on it some not at all, thats true of all martial arts.

    To Mr. Fitzsimons:

    Despite my username I am not speaking for Hammerheadgyms old dojo, however I do maintain a friendly relationship with them. I would appreciate if you did not mention them directly by name as Hammerheadgym has nt, as a member of a traditional Japanese organisation you will understand my request, as they are being dragged into a dispute that they have no involvement with.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,674 ✭✭✭Peetrik


    I dont mean to divert the thread here but I have to ask as its so rare to come across someone who has trained MMA/BJJ and then gone back to only training a less mainstream traditional martial art.

    Keith do you really feel, after training once a week with no sparring/competing since 2003, that you are as effective a fighter as you could be if you had stuck to MMA/BJJ?

    Not trying to score points or anything just genuinely interested in your answer


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,029 ✭✭✭HammerHeadGym


    Hi Colm good to hear from you. How's the kid? must be nearly ready for school by now?
    ruadh74 wrote: »
    Hello David, Colm Fitzsimons here from the Genbukan.Just to reply to your post. You are not or never were a member of the Genbukan for 6 years and to claim that you were is an absolute falsehood.
    My apologies Colm, I was a member of a practically identical orginazition run by the same people with the same instructors, teaching virtually identical techniques in an identical manner. Most of whom wear both patches on their gi. Different flavours of the same soup, shall we say. At least one of your senior guys does anyway ;)
    ruadh74 wrote: »
    ...you did not train regularly even for the short time you were affiliated to us under a fully qualified, trained Genbukan instructor or attend regular Genbukan classes during that time.
    I trained twice daily (more or less) in Japan for almost 2 months, Attented 6 (I think) weekend seminars, and about a few other classes. Around 150 hours or so, i would guess. While I'm aware that this isn't long enough to obtain mastery, you can definitely decide if what you're looking at is practical or not by this stage.
    I'm making a point about technique here. The omote kote gyaku (for example) is the same on both the KJJR and Genbukan syllabi. Along with dozens more. If the one I know from the Ju-jutsu doesn't work in a real situation, (and I was graded and passed by the highest rank in the country on this), I can assume the Ninpo one wont be any better. Or did the ninja know something that the samurai didn't?
    ruadh74 wrote: »
    I saw you at one or maybe two seminars in Ireland when you were with the KJJR and I personally train at every class, I remember seeing you at one of them but it may have been two, I will give you the benefit of the doubt. This was during the entire time you and your group were affiliated to us.
    That I can remember, there was one in dingle, one (or two) in Brighton, one in galway, one in belgium, one in japan, we had the Shibu -cho down in our big hall at least once, one in Meath, somewhere, where we stayed over and did the cross country stuff in the morning, one in Viginia, on the first floor of somewhere, (when one of the ballincollig brothers had collected me from the bus station) and there was one in Navan, in a school, if I recall. (possibly the weekly class?) I have a feeling I went to this one twice as I can recall getting changed on stage behind a curtain, ond once on the hardwood floor. Possibly not though.
    ruadh74 wrote: »
    ....When we were in Japan, you tried to put some arm locks on me and when you couldn’t you kept asking me why you couldn’t put them on me, even though I was not resisting and relaxed in order to help you learn them and you were supposed to have already learnt them. I told you that you had to go and learn the patterns correctly and continue practising. You looked totally disillusioned especially after all of your previous years of martial arts training and I could understand at the time what that must have been like.
    Lol, yes I remember that quite well. You are unable to straighten your arm due to a (bicycle??) accident. I recall at least four masters coming over to show me how it was done and not one of them was able to straighten that elbow. Only the grandmaster realised your condition and quickly changed the technique so as to complete the takedown and restraint. He made me take a note that one must continually change the technique until youre successful. I still tell that story actually as a caveat to never blindly obey a syllabus.
    ruadh74 wrote: »
    ...it was a Genbukan instructor helping you, something that you may not be aware of.
    Actually well aware of Shibu-cho's help both in Ireland and Japan, on both a personal and professional level, but since neither he nor any other instrucor of mine has anything to do with the assertion that the Ninpo syllabus as taught, anywhere I've seen it anyway, is impractical for self defence, I'm just going to leave them out of it altogether.
    ruadh74 wrote: »
    ... nobody is forced to do anything they don’t or can’t do, you have a choice, and you have free will.
    I had a class stopped so an instructor could make an ar$ehole out me for being unable to sit in a stress position. Class did not resume until I had returned to seiza. Several people remarked afterwards that the seiza section seemed to be particulalry long that day, almost certainly as a result of me having to come up to my knees so much. I don't want to get all 'a few good men' here, but you see where I'm going against the free will arguement?
    ruadh74 wrote: »
    ... when you join an organisation you have to obey their rules and regulations.
    When I saw the importance of rules, relative to the importance of training, I realised that would only make me a teacher. never a fighter.
    ruadh74 wrote: »
    ... If you don’t want to obey their rules and regulations, you simply walk out.
    That's what I did. Never looked back.
    ruadh74 wrote: »
    ...Please do not use the Genbukan as an excuse for your inability to come to terms with any previous bad experiences you have had in the martial arts even if it has a tenuous overlap into our school.
    Again, this is nothing personal between me and any other instructor. I never had a problem with self defence in Ryoi Shinto Ryu. In fact I found it far better than the Genbukan, due to their desire to spar in scenario based combat (in a crowd, at a door, as a bodyguard protecting a client etc.) I found anyone who instructed there to be very capable of SD stuff. There were so many bouncers, bodyguards, security personel, defence and police force guys training there, you could always get to mix it up and try it for real. (or as close to real as you can get in a controlled environment)
    I guess what brought it home for me were 4 seperate incidents in Japan during training;
    1) was your elbow, and the blind adherense to the syllabus and a technique that was clearly never going to work on you. I felt, there was a lack of creativity.
    2) When I asked my partner if he'd like me to attack a little more realistically, I was sneered at and told that we were no pratising 'street martial arts', but 'traditonal martial arts' and as such, any attempt to make it realistic was just stupid. This actually scared me, as at the time I was a bouncer on a very rough door in one of dublin's crime areas. If I could not make it realistic then it's first test could be in a life or death situation.
    3) When my long term partner on one trip, who had delighted in throwing me through the mats, realised he would have to take as many throws as he gave me one day, he refused to train with me for the remainder of the day. To clarify, he came looking for me to practice his throws on, and when I said I too would be working on a throwing syllabus, he said he actually wanted to study sword that day. That's a bully, pure and simple.
    4) During a discussion of real life anecdotes, a -54kg, 17 year old, swore blind that if anyone attacked him, anyone, he could floor him with a downward chop to the neck. I asked if he'd ever done this, or seen this done, he said 'I don't need to, my sensei says it works' I asked if he taught it would stop me and while he swore it would, could not be persuaded to try it for any price. That goes beyond bad training. That's downright dangerous to give an impressionable young person the idea that they are so powerful.
    ruadh74 wrote: »
    If however any Genbukan instructor has caused you concern due to differences or personal feelings then I will apologise completely on their behalf - something we are not afraid to do so we can move on and get on with our training without conflict.
    Very gracious of you Colm but no, I never had a personal problem with any Genbukan Instructor whose class I was a part of, in any country, at any time. Once again, my problem is with a lack of practicality in the training. Not the syllabus itself, but in the choreographed fashion in which everything is taught.
    ruadh74 wrote: »
    ...nobody ever said the flowery words you used to describe our sparring, you simply made those words up yourself.
    the exact phrase was 'the only people who spar are the ones who need to feed an ego'. The word vulgar was used by a high level english student, as a possible reaction to a request to spar with the Japanese. They said that asking someone for a spar could even be seen as a challenge and would certainly get me in trouble.
    ruadh74 wrote: »
    ...will allow you to eventually see the full scope of Genbukan training including sparring but if you don’t attend any classes then you won’t see any.
    Unfortunately the operative word here is eventually. Anyone I ever asked said that it was rarely done in their respective dojo as emphasis was placed on learning syllabus techniques.
    Just to clarify, could you give me a rough guide line as to how often sparring is practised in the Genbukan?
    ruadh74 wrote: »
    I am happy that you have found a martial art that suits you. I wish you a wonderful and successful martial arts career.
    Thanks Colm. Hope things are going your way too. Regards to your family.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5 ruadh74


    QUOTE=HammerHeadGym;70267833]

    ....... around 150 hours or so, i would guess.

    150 hours of training in the Genbukan - this simply isn't true (regular Genbukan training is the point of all of this, which you didn't have).

    I'm making a point about technique here. The omote kote gyaku (for example) is the same on both the KJJR and Genbukan syllabi. Along with dozens more. If the one I know from the Ju-jutsu doesn't work in a real situation, (and I was graded and passed by the highest rank in the country on this), I can assume the Ninpo one wont be any better. Or did the ninja know something that the samurai didn't?

    Omote kote gyaku in Ninpo and KJJR, while similar, are not the same pattern and are therefore different. In the kyu syllabus, omote kote gyaku is taught at the most basic level, just like a beginning punch or kick. How you apply omote kote gyaku may not work for you, just like any technique may not work for everybody in any school of any style. However, omote kote gyaku at Dan grade is a totally different technique.

    You are unable to straighten your arm due to a (bicycle??) accident. I recall at least four masters coming over to show me how it was done and not one of them was able to straighten that elbow. Only the grandmaster realised your condition and quickly changed the technique so as to complete the take down and restraint. He made me take a note that one must continually change the technique until youre successful. I still tell that story actually as a caveat to never blindly obey a syllabus.

    Yes, I had a bike accident but dozens of not just instructors but fellow students can put that lock on me because they are drilled in the pattern, trying it out on different people of different sizes and through training people eventually feel that my arm is different. You should not continually do the same pattern on the same people, something which is taught in the Genbukan. If you think a technique doesn't work, it doesn't matter, techniques are like this for students in every martial art, it's a personal thing.

    There were so many bouncers, bodyguards, security personel, defence and police force guys training there, you could always get to mix it up and try it for real.

    I am well aware of the personal protection in your previous schools, however, we have Genbukan members in Ireland who have fought in wars, and who are able to bring that true life experience to the dojo.

    4) During a discussion of real life anecdotes, a -54kg, 17 year old, swore blind that if anyone attacked him, anyone, he could floor him with a downward chop to the neck. I asked if he'd ever done this, or seen this done, he said 'I don't need to, my sensei says it works' I asked if he taught it would stop me and while he swore it would, could not be persuaded to try it for any price. That goes beyond bad training. That's downright dangerous to give an impressionable young person the idea that they are so powerful.

    In relation to the above quote, let's be honest David, surely do you not think that the majority of impressionable 17 year old's who are practicing a martial art would think that about their specific martial art. It's really not fair to quote a 17 year old as representing the Genbukan - in fact, it's a bit harsh to use this as an argument.

    Basically David, the main point of our response was to your first post. Your first post was both negative and very, very wrong, giving the impression that you were both experienced in our school for 6 years of training (which simply was not the case) and that you had no good experiences with us, that you learnt nothing in 6 years, where in fact you were training in the KJJR through a transition period for the majority of that time and not under a fully trained Genbukan instructor at regular lessons whatsoever but as a continuation of your previous martial arts through the transition and on into the KJJR system.

    However, the tone of your second post is completely different to that of your original post and offers a better insight into your reasons for the way you reflected upon us. I just want to simply say that those reasons, although personal to you, are not in any way major and do not reflect badly on us. You cannot quote a 17 year old as representing us - that is just naive. Every martial art in the world has that 17 year old in their organisation and thinks their impregnable.

    Again I'd like to wish you luck in your martial arts career in the future and thank you for enquiring about the family and I am just happy that all of this is now cleared up.

    Regards,

    Colm Fitzsimons.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5 ruadh74


    As a footnote to our previous posts, an instructor from another organisation was unintentionally pulled in to the debate. So we are removing the link. There is no reflection on the Ryo Shinto Ryu as we know them to be a professional organisation. However, we are fully right and just in stating clearly someone’s training history when they claim they have been with the Genbukan for 6 years which simply isn’t true.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 732 ✭✭✭SorGan


    ruadh74 wrote: »
    As a footnote to our previous posts, an instructor from another organisation was unintentionally pulled in to the debate. So we are removing the link. There is no reflection on the Ryo Shinto Ryu as we know them to be a professional organisation. However, we are fully right and just in stating clearly someone’s training history when they claim they have been with the Genbukan for 6 years which simply isn’t true.

    so.......how is it for selfdefence anyway?

    :cool:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,720 ✭✭✭Sid_Justice


    It's hard to imagine these places still exist. The fallacies, it's almost like it's 2004 again.

    These technique when shown to a white belt doesn't work? but the black belt version does work? Why should the white belt version if it's crap.

    'Traditional Japanese Martial Arts' with all this Samurai and Ninja stuff just sounds like (pseudo)-historical reenactment for Japanophiles.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 160 ✭✭CaseyRyback


    RLJ wrote: »
    http://www.genbukan.ie/ninpo.html

    Unusually they do not allow anyone to watch a training session

    You've said enough to set alarm bells ringing for me. Super secret ninja schools are best avoided in my view. Try boxing, judo or bjj! You can watch classes and most clubs/gyms will let you train for free to give you a taste.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29 paganist


    You know what, to each their own.
    Just because BJJ or boxing or MT or something clicked for you it might not feel right to someone else, and vise versa.
    Try everything, but don't knock what you have no experience in.
    Peace.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 62 ✭✭mugger


    the post is about the system is good for self defence

    differnt arts for differnt people of corse,everybody likes and wants something else out of wat they train in,so i would say train in as many as you can or the ones ur interested in for a month(2 or 3 times a week) and make ur mind up
    but i dont think anyone can say for self defence or for learning how to fight for the real fight,you wont get any better than MMA,thaiboxing,boxing
    not only do you need to learn how do hit someone etc that doesnt want to be hit you also need to no wat it feels like to be on the other end and not to **** urself if someone does hurt you
    some other arts are still good and better than notting but you wont beat the above in learning how to fight


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 24,878 ✭✭✭✭arybvtcw0eolkf


    It's hard to imagine these places still exist. The fallacies, it's almost like it's 2004 again.

    These technique when shown to a white belt doesn't work? but the black belt version does work? Why should the white belt version if it's crap.

    'Traditional Japanese Martial Arts' with all this Samurai and Ninja stuff just sounds like (pseudo)-historical reenactment for Japanophiles.

    Sorta like a lot of lads training in BJJ who think they're replicating their hero's in the UFC, buying only the latest multi-patch Gi, Sprawl Fight Shorts & Tapout Tee's & hoodies & telling their mates their training in MMA until you scratch the surface & its a BJJ class they're taking..

    And so if a club/teacher is selling its version of some ancient Japanese style, feck it if its enjoyable and getting young lads off their fat arses - what harm?.

    You know what style I found most spectacular in competition? (as a spectator) - Kendo!.

    I've worked with lads from all styles on the doors, best lads have been boxers, Aikidoka, Ninjitsu players and Judoka.

    Feck it, while I'm on a rant I'll continue :p

    Tell ya something else.. For all the stick combatives and the Krav heads get here, I'd have more confidence working with someone tapping away at some KM or Combatives than I would some with young lad training only BJJ... Go one the eye gouger's ;)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 732 ✭✭✭SorGan


    Sorta like a lot of lads training in BJJ who think they're replicating their hero's in the UFC, buying only the latest multi-patch Gi, Sprawl Fight Shorts & Tapout Tee's & hoodies & telling their mates their training in MMA until you scratch the surface & its a BJJ class they're taking..
    walter mittys:D


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 24,878 ✭✭✭✭arybvtcw0eolkf


    SorGan wrote: »
    walter mittys:D

    Well I wouldn't go so far as to say they're Walts as BJJ is a great style to train in.

    Its been marketed brilliantly, and its the easier option to training in a style which might mean getting a kicking, punched in the head or thrown through a floor..

    Its an important component of MMA, but its not MMA some people have to stop deluding themselves it is!.

    And as the topic is self defence.. Well IMO there are better styles to train in if its self defence you want - and why the average person on the street wants 'self defence' is beyond me anyway.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 160 ✭✭CaseyRyback


    and why the average person on the street wants 'self defence' is beyond me anyway.

    Blame the media. The fear of crime is far more prevalent than crime itself and this is mostly down to the media and how they portray what goes on on our streets, terrifying ordinary soaps into the bargain.

    On the subject of BJJ and self-defence, I cannot see how it can be regarded as a sd system when taken in isolation. Groundwork is an essential part of sd but I can think of no surer way to get a hiding than throwing yourself onto the ground when confronted with a violent aggressor (unless you happen to GSP or BJ Penn). Its the same argument you make re bjj and MMA. It is a part of the answer but not the complete solution.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 195 ✭✭00MARTZ00


    Sorta like a lot of lads training in BJJ who think they're replicating their hero's in the UFC, buying only the latest multi-patch Gi, Sprawl Fight Shorts & Tapout Tee's & hoodies & telling their mates their training in MMA until you scratch the surface & its a BJJ class they're taking..

    And so if a club/teacher is selling its version of some ancient Japanese style, feck it if its enjoyable and getting young lads off their fat arses - what harm?.

    You know what style I found most spectacular in competition? (as a spectator) - Kendo!.

    I've worked with lads from all styles on the doors, best lads have been boxers, Aikidoka, Ninjitsu players and Judoka.

    Feck it, while I'm on a rant I'll continue :p

    Tell ya something else.. For all the stick combatives and the Krav heads get here, I'd have more confidence working with someone tapping away at some KM or Combatives than I would some with young lad training only BJJ... Go one the eye gouger's ;)

    Excellent post! And i must say kendo is a fantastic sport to watch!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,029 ✭✭✭HammerHeadGym


    Hi, apologies for the late response, I have been up the my neck with work. And still nothing to show for it, haha.
    ruadh74 wrote: »
    150 hours of training in the Genbukan - this simply isn't true
    Perhaps you could give me an estimate of the time spent under Genbukan instructors then, based on the information I have provided.
    ruadh74 wrote: »
    Omote kote gyaku in Ninpo and KJJR, while similar, are not the same pattern and are therefore different...
    Not so different that I can't draw a direct comparison of the two schools, which was my point originally.
    ruadh74 wrote: »
    ... dozens of not just instructors but fellow students can put that lock on me because they are drilled in the pattern...
    Just not the grand master, nor two 7th or 8th Dans? Incidentally, you were the only person I couldn't put that lock onto.
    ruadh74 wrote: »
    You should not continually do the same pattern on the same people, something which is taught in the Genbukan.
    Actually, in my experience great emphasis was placed on repeating the syllabus verbatim, including where limbs not conected to the technique were placed. I understand this is a neccessary part of anachronism, but may be superfluous to the needs of the average self defence enthusiast.
    ruadh74 wrote: »
    ...we have Genbukan members in Ireland who have fought in wars, and who are able to bring that true life experience to the dojo.
    I didn't bring up ryoshin military personnel as some sort of p!ssing contest, I used it to illustrate a willingness to test the techniques.
    ruadh74 wrote: »
    ..surely do you not think that the majority of impressionable 17 year old's who are practicing a martial art would think that about their specific martial art.
    That's a fair point (I'm assuming you left out the 'not' in front of the would :)) It is still however, a learned response. Someone has told him that this move is so dangerous as to fell a 100kg guy charging you down. If he's not testing his stuff, then how does he know? I have met comparitively few 17 year old boxers who think that one blow will stop any attacker, regardless of size or aggression level.
    ruadh74 wrote: »
    ...It's really not fair to quote a 17 year old as representing the Genbukan
    Fair point, by the same token, it is unfair to quote my most minor grievance as representing my argument against the Genbukan.
    ruadh74 wrote: »
    ...Your first post was both negative
    That's an inferrence of your own creation to be honest. My only point was that as it's currently being taught, it was impractical for self defence.
    ruadh74 wrote: »
    ...and very, very wrong, giving the impression that you were both experienced in our school for 6 years of training
    From what I saw I could make out no discernable difference between the two schools, given that they share a lineage, teachers and even techniques.
    ruadh74 wrote: »
    ... and that you had no good experiences with us, that you learnt nothing in 6 years
    Again, an inferrence on your part. I loved training in KJJR and Genbukan Ninpo. (Still have the tabi ;))
    ruadh74 wrote: »
    ...not under a fully trained Genbukan instructor
    No but fully trained in the sister art that is thaught in conjuction with Genbukan. (Well not fully trained but he was 2nd Dan when I left) Plus many of my musings include other high level students (not neccessarily instructors) of the Genbukan, while attenting international seminars, or staying in Japan.
    ruadh74 wrote: »
    ...although personal to you...
    Sorry mate, but to suggest I took something personally and that is my reason for not being a fan of the Genbukan self defence is wrong. To clear it up; I never had any serious problem with anyone in the Genbukan. By and large, they are lovely people. My problem was with the unwilingness to try it out, and the blaise attitude that went along with knowing everything worked, as passed down from senior to junior, in perpetuity.
    ruadh74 wrote: »
    ...are not in any way major and do not reflect badly on us.
    Actually, I think that it is the fundamental flaw underlying Genbukan, and how it's taught, but we can agree to disagree if you like.

    Anyway, I hope that lays it all to rest. Best of luck for the future, and give my regards to those that can remember me.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29 paganist


    Just not the grand master, nor two 7th or 8th Dans? Incidentally, you were the only person I couldn't put that lock onto.

    At least it sounds like they dont just pretend stuff works all the time.
    I picture most TMA's that have a grandmaster to pretend anything he does is perfect and works 100% of the time, kinda like some of those aikido type videos on youtube where anyone can tell the uke's are just bad actors.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 513 ✭✭✭leddpipe


    this is genuinely one of the best threads ive read on boards in years!proper debate between informed people!(although some might dispute the "informed" part lol)!either way, keep it up! :cool:


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,029 ✭✭✭HammerHeadGym


    paganist wrote: »
    At least it sounds like they dont just pretend stuff works all the time. I picture most TMA's that have a grandmaster to pretend anything he does is perfect and works 100% of the time...

    To be honest, the further you get from Japan, the more fanatical the devotion. The Grand MAster himself, is extremely humble and will be the first to tell you to change immediatly if your current attack fails.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 246 ✭✭emmet the rover


    i had the pleasure to train with the Genbukan for over a year a couple of years ago unfortunitly due to family and work commitments i had to stop training but hope to restart again at a future date.

    i came to the first training session with no previous experience and as has been siad was told that members particpate rather than watch a training session. no join up fee or anything just sign a insurance form and join in.

    it is a very formal setup from bowing to the order things are done in and the use of japanese phrases. however my sensi and the other members were more than happy to assist me and make me feel relaxed and welcome.

    there as has also been siad alot of rolling and various breakfalls . this is what i found the most difficult to grasp but again i was instructed at my own pace and learned to enjoy it (though still never masterd it)

    there was alot to take from each class and movment in a "real world" situation i believe and i feel more confident out and about having done it. i found myself more aware of balance and body position as well as weak points on my own and my potential opponent while in various positions.

    there is also more to the genbuakan than simple physical combat there are teachings on every aspect of life usually given after a class is finished. this however should not be misinterprated as a religon in any way.

    its not for everyone but then again what is?

    hope this helps

    emmetg


Advertisement