If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)

Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Is this over priced?

Nulty · 2009-07-29 11:55:57

Roi de vitesse in the Vintage at 2.45 Goodwood at 12/1 I think so....or else Big Audio is too short at 7/1. This betting seems wrong to me even though there's relatively unseen horses running. Big Audio beat Emperor Claudius at Ascot and both, including Lucky General were beaten well by RDV at Newmarket. Doesn't add up

29-07-2009 11:55am

#1

Nulty

Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,838 ✭✭✭

Join Date: May 2006

Posts: 7404

Roi de vitesse in the Vintage at 2.45 Goodwood at 12/1

I think so....or else Big Audio is too short at 7/1.

This betting seems wrong to me even though there's relatively unseen horses running.

Big Audio beat Emperor Claudius at Ascot and both, including Lucky General were beaten well by RDV at Newmarket. Doesn't add up

0

Comments

#2 29-07-2009 2:04pm

mike65

Closed Accounts Posts: 88,972 ✭✭✭✭

Join Date: May 2001

Posts: 84057

Nope as it happens

0
#3 29-07-2009 5:12pm

Nulty

Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,838 ✭✭✭

Join Date: May 2006

Posts: 7404

As it happens he should have been 5th in the betting. he beat a 4/1, 11/2 and a 9/1. Fair enough he had nothing at the end and shows he'd probably never beat xtension but he's never 14/1 in that race. RDV should've been 9/1 and lucky general 14/1.

0
#4 29-07-2009 7:24pm

raheny red

Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,613 ✭✭✭

Join Date: December 2005

Posts: 2520

mike65 wrote: »

Nope as it happens

Still could have been over priced in the OP's opinion

0
#5 29-07-2009 9:49pm

Nulty

Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,838 ✭✭✭

Join Date: May 2006

Posts: 7404

raheny red wrote: »

Still could have been over priced in the OP's opinion

Do I detect a hint of condescension?

0
#6 30-07-2009 5:11am

raheny red

Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,613 ✭✭✭

Join Date: December 2005

Posts: 2520

Nope none at all.

0
Advertisement