Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

F Class Calibre

  • 19-07-2009 10:42pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 6,096 ✭✭✭


    A friend of mine want to shoot F Class and wants to know which would be the better calibre 6mm BR or 6.5 x 284


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,034 ✭✭✭✭It wasn't me!


    6.5-284 is going to buck wind better downrange. 6mmBR is going to kick less and make shooting more accurate. I've shot both and while it kicks a lot more than the 6mmBR, the 6.5-284 isn't going to hurt anyone either. I'd say the 6.5-284 makes more sense, but it's rough on barrels, where 6mmBR is not. All judgement calls he'll have to make. Good choices both though.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,612 ✭✭✭jwshooter


    A friend of mine want to shoot F Class and wants to know which would be the better calibre 6mm BR or 6.5 x 284

    6.5x284 is a favourite 7mm s are also very popular .iv shot 6.5x284 built on a neskia bay action by steve kershaw he would be a good man to talk to.

    our problem is not custom guns but custom ammo . thats where the shoots are not fair if you are prepared to smuggle in loading gear and components you have a advantage over the law abiding shooter


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,038 ✭✭✭✭Sparks


    Actually, you're not smuggling in the equipment or the bullets or the brass jw.
    Primers and powder, that's something else - though there are apparently a few who've obtained licences for that, so they're not breaking any laws either.
    (And there are no laws against reloading itself).


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,612 ✭✭✭jwshooter


    Sparks wrote: »
    Actually, you're not smuggling in the equipment or the bullets or the brass jw.
    Primers and powder, that's something else - though there are apparently a few who've obtained licences for that, so they're not breaking any laws either.
    (And there are no laws against reloading itself).

    actually they are .
    i said loading gear and "components " ie powder primers heads .


    apparently ? ,are you talking about the article 7 that was printed by cal ward in the digest that belonged to a friend of mine ward got his grubby little hands on a copy of it through a dealer in the north .no components were imported as the doj would not give a importation licence and they have not granted any apparently .


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,296 ✭✭✭rowa


    surely if there are no laws against something, e.g. reloading ,then it is not illegal ? if it were illegal then there would be a specific law against it , or is it a case of "garda policy" or "doj policy" similar to the handgun ban for all those years ? there were no actual laws banning pistols, apart from a temporary 2 week ban , but we're just not going to give you a licence anyway .

    this is the only "free" country in the world that this type of buffoonery would be accepted by the law-abiding public .

    surely when the guy in donegal had his case thrown out of court for reloading rifle ammo ,then that should have been an end to it .


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,038 ✭✭✭✭Sparks


    It's not illegal to reload rowa, nor to have the equipment to do it, nor to have most of the components.
    However, you need an explosives licence for the primers and the propellant; without it, you're breaking the law. That's why reloading (and black powder shooting) is waiting on the rewrite of the explosives act instead of on a new firearms act.

    jw, no, I'm not talking about cal. I generally don't weigh anything he says very heavily, as that tends to save time.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,461 ✭✭✭foxshooter243


    A friend of mine want to shoot F Class and wants to know which would be the better calibre 6mm BR or 6.5 x 284

    6mm Dasher-an improved 6mm br and good barrel life compared to the 6.5 by 284:)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 682 ✭✭✭demonloop


    Sparks wrote: »
    I'm not talking about cal. I generally don't weigh anything he says very heavily, as that tends to save time.
    :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,296 ✭✭✭rowa


    Sparks wrote: »
    It's not illegal to reload rowa, nor to have the equipment to do it, nor to have most of the components.
    However, you need an explosives licence for the primers and the propellant; without it, you're breaking the law. That's why reloading (and black powder shooting) is waiting on the rewrite of the explosives act instead of on a new firearms act.

    jw, no, I'm not talking about cal. I generally don't weigh anything he says very heavily, as that tends to save time.
    i'd love to get into black powder shooting , anyone know the guidelines on the gun we are going to be allowed ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,038 ✭✭✭✭Sparks


    Noone has even a ghost of an idea outside of the DoJ at the moment rowa, and even there I think it's far from concrete - most of the effort of late hasn't been going into the Explosives Act rewrite but the Misc.Provisions Bill and the Range and Clubs SIs.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,244 ✭✭✭rrpc


    rowa wrote: »
    i'd love to get into black powder shooting , anyone know the guidelines on the gun we are going to be allowed ?
    Most black powder firearms are smooth bore and as such are licensed as shotguns.

    The only issue (as Sparks said) is getting the propellant.


Advertisement