Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

F22 Raptor Shot.

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,675 ✭✭✭ronnie3585


    I thought someone shot a Raptor.

    Cool pic though.


  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 10,520 Mod ✭✭✭✭5uspect


    That's a pretty cool shock structure. Get out your protractors and figure out the Mach Number!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,190 ✭✭✭Silenceisbliss


    5uspect wrote: »
    That's a pretty cool shock structure. Get out your protractors and figure out the Mach Number!

    ha, that was my first thought when I first saw that picture aswell....we're all such nerds....what a fail.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,924 ✭✭✭Nforce


    5uspect wrote: »
    That's a pretty cool shock structure. Get out your protractors and figure out the Mach Number!

    My guess is that it isn't going supersonic at all. The shock cone does not necessarily mean an aircraft travelling @ Mach1+.....eg see these pics


  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 10,520 Mod ✭✭✭✭5uspect


    Nah its a supersonic shock, those pics just show condensation due to the pressure change on the wing. There isn't the clear discontinuity.
    Plus the shock structure is forming exaclty as it should.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,174 ✭✭✭✭Captain Chaos


    Almost 100% not supersonic. Its very close though, I'd say about M0.96. Even over a USN carrier I don't think they are allowed to go supersonic that low. They are allowed to do supersonic flybys of Navy ships but they have to be in and around 10,000ft as far as I know.

    Got that info from a book about F-14 squadrons in active duty over Iraq and Afganistan.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,513 ✭✭✭Sleipnir


    Almost 100% not supersonic. Its very close though, I'd say about M0.96. Even over a USN carrier I don't think they are allowed to go supersonic that low. They are allowed to do supersonic flybys of Navy ships but they have to be in and around 10,000ft as far as I know.

    Got that info from a book about F-14 squadrons in active duty over Iraq and Afganistan.


    +1 The shock waves are oblique to the surfaces they came from. If it was truly supersonic, the shock would be in front of the aircraft.

    Still, great shot.


  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 10,520 Mod ✭✭✭✭5uspect


    Sleipnir wrote: »
    +1 The shock waves are oblique to the surfaces they came from. If it was truly supersonic, the shock would be in front of the aircraft.

    Still, great shot.

    No. If it were M>0.3, i.e. compressible then you would have a curved bow wave in front of the nose. If its transonic M = 1 you will get normal shocks on the wing.
    If its supersonic then you get sharp oblique shocks and sudden changes of angle. You would get normal shocks at inlets but not an the geometry you find on an F-22.

    A supersonic shock wave is essentially the flow being asked to move out of the way faster than it would like (via pressure waves).
    Therefore the shocks are attached.

    EDIT for example:
    325px-Schlieren_photography.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,924 ✭✭✭Nforce


    Here's another example of a non supersonic vapour cone....



    As stated earlier in the thread, the F-22 was not going supersonic.;)


  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 10,520 Mod ✭✭✭✭5uspect


    Not quite. There are very big differences between your examples and the OP's image.

    First of all such a vapour cone formed by low pressure when flow is accelerated over the aircraft. In the near transonic case the wings and even the canopy effectively become supersonic nozzles and generate near normal shocks.

    pulverizationcloud.jpg

    The shape of the base of the cone is a good representation of the lift distribution over the wing. Note that it does not really extend beyond the wing tip, decreasing with span.
    060911n8604l741w.jpg

    In a hard turn or high angle of attack the low pressure over the wing due to high lift also causes vapour but not as sharply, for example from your previous post for the subsonic F-117:
    muguf117.jpg

    With supersonic flight the shock structure extends significantly beyond the aircraft. It is effectively tearing through the air. The original shot shows the the shocks extend well beyond the lifting surfaces and there are several of them as here:
    34086588ck9.jpg


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 167 ✭✭hexagramer


    when i was in the raafc as a kid they used to tell us no pilot was alowd break barriers or endanger the life span of an expensive fighter jet or they face instant dishonorable discharge.

    crazy americans :D


Advertisement