Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Surgery/Pathology reports

  • 17-06-2009 3:24pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,647 ✭✭✭


    Can anyone advise as to the procedure for obtaining copies of these? Obviously after my own surgery, not any one elses.Thanks in advance.


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 61 ✭✭flerb22


    get in touch with the team which operated on you through the hospital switchboard, or the medical records office in the hospital you were in.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,073 ✭✭✭sam34


    you will have to request a copy of your notes under the freedom of information act. write to the consultant who operated on you, state you are requesting the notes under freedom of info act, and the consultant will pass the letter on to the relevant person in admin. your request has to be in writing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 196 ✭✭charlieroot


    Just wondering - are you obliged to release medical records under the Freedom of Information Act or the Data Protection Act? I was under the impression you didn't have to unless compelled to by a court? Though I think generally they are given anyway.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,073 ✭✭✭sam34


    you are obliged to release them.

    however, there is a caveat that you do not have to release anything which would be detrimental to the patient's health to read - i cant remember the exact wording, but thats the gist of it. sometimes in psychiatry we would omit some sections of notes. not sure if/how surgeons or physicians would apply that principle.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,778 ✭✭✭tallaght01


    your GP is very likely to have been sent a copy of any significant path results.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,647 ✭✭✭dragona


    tallaght01 wrote: »
    your GP is very likely to have been sent a copy of any significant path results.

    Would it be acceptable just to ask him for a copy then, or would I have to go through certain channels? I take it that if he were in a bad mood, he could just say *it's all ok* or just plain no!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,073 ✭✭✭sam34


    dragona wrote: »
    Would it be acceptable just to ask him for a copy then, or would I have to go through certain channels? I take it that if he were in a bad mood, he could just say *it's all ok* or just plain no!

    no harm in asking!
    but he may say you have to go through official channels, as i outlined above.

    but chance your arm and see what happens!


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 4,757 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tree


    Just wondering - are you obliged to release medical records under the Freedom of Information Act or the Data Protection Act? I was under the impression you didn't have to unless compelled to by a court? Though I think generally they are given anyway.
    Freedom of Information as it's a goverment body.

    They can choose to release sensitive material such as medical records to a suitable third party such as your gp.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,971 ✭✭✭_Whimsical_


    sam34 wrote: »
    you are obliged to release them.

    however, there is a caveat that you do not have to release anything which would be detrimental to the patient's health to read - i cant remember the exact wording, but thats the gist of it. sometimes in psychiatry we would omit some sections of notes. not sure if/how surgeons or physicians would apply that principle.

    That's interesting.I have never heard of that caveat before. Are there guidelines determining what would constitute "detrimental to a patients health to read" or would it be left to the doctor releasing the notes to decide?

    I had always thought that a patient was entitled to be made aware of all information relating to their health and medical care.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,073 ✭✭✭sam34


    chilly wrote: »
    That's interesting.I have never heard of that caveat before. Are there guidelines determining what would constitute "detrimental to a patients health to read" or would it be left to the doctor releasing the notes to decide?

    I had always thought that a patient was entitled to be made aware of all information relating to their health and medical care.

    as i sais, im not 100% sure thats the exact wording of it, but its the general idea.

    i dont think there are specific guidelines (or if there are, ive never seen them).

    the kind of things we would sometimes leave out in psychiatry would be some of the information you get as collateral history from family, along with who provided it, if it contained very sensitive stuff.

    as i type this im actually struggling to think of the last time i saw information being withheld from someone, and i cant actually remmeber when it was. id say ive seen it two or three times tops, out of a lot of requests.

    and i cant imagine what info medics or surgeons would consider witholding.

    i suppose some people may take the view that doing this is very paternalistic and interferes with the patients rights.... i dont really see it that way myself. it is done with the patients best interests at heaart at all times. there is no provision to withold info to cover up medical error or negligence.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,971 ✭✭✭_Whimsical_


    sam34 wrote: »

    the kind of things we would sometimes leave out in psychiatry would be some of the information you get as collateral history from family, along with who provided it, if it contained very sensitive stuff.


    i suppose some people may take the view that doing this is very paternalistic and interferes with the patients rights.... i dont really see it that way myself. it is done with the patients best interests at heaart at all times. there is no provision to withold info to cover up medical error or negligence.

    Thanks for that sam34. I can see how it could be useful in the circumstances that you outline provided that the patients care or diagnosis wasn't heavily influenced by the additional history provided by relatives. I'm sure that would be highly unlikely though. :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 893 ✭✭✭joey54


    I too am looking to have a medical report released to me. I am composing my letter at the moment and just wanted to double check that it is section 6 of the freedom of Information act which entitles me to receive a copy of the report/file. Thanks!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,143 ✭✭✭locum-motion


    joey54 wrote: »
    I too am looking to have a medical report released to me. I am composing my letter at the moment and just wanted to double check that it is section 6 of the freedom of Information act which entitles me to receive a copy of the report/file. Thanks!


    Why not ask in a legal section of the site? "What section of the act...?" is not a biological or medical question.

    Or, alternatively, go to www.irishstatutebook.ie and look it up yourself!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,373 ✭✭✭Dr Galen


    i don't think you actually have to go quoting the relevant bits of the act. A short letter asking for your medical records to be released to you is all it's taken anytime I've seen it. It's not a big deal at all for hospitals, just involves paperwork and a lot of photocopying


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 893 ✭✭✭joey54


    i don't think you actually have to go quoting the relevant bits of the act. A short letter asking for your medical records to be released to you is all it's taken anytime I've seen it. It's not a big deal at all for hospitals, just involves paperwork and a lot of photocopying

    Thanks. Wasn't sure whether or not you had to sate the Act to them. Will just write a letter and send it. Thanks again.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,073 ✭✭✭sam34


    state the act - ie freedom of information act, but you dont need to state the section of the act.


Advertisement