Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Freephone number

  • 03-06-2009 8:51am
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,710 ✭✭✭


    Hi,

    Does anyone have any experience in setting up a 1800 number?
    And if so do you think that it is worth the extra expense?

    Thanks


    Edit: Or number :)


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 420 ✭✭Tony255


    how about a locall 1890 number these are not as expensive, I had to set one of these up years ago and it was pretty easy I could probably dig out the company name if you are interested let me know and I will have a look


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 677 ✭✭✭darc


    Tony255 wrote: »
    how about a locall 1890 number these are not as expensive, I had to set one of these up years ago and it was pretty easy I could probably dig out the company name if you are interested let me know and I will have a look

    problem with lo call is that it is 30c a minute to call from a mobile even if you have a bundle of minutes, also with most mobiles and lanlines you get calls included, so a easy to remember land line number is as good as a lo call or offer both.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,710 ✭✭✭RoadKillTs


    Thanks for the advice lads.
    I'm thinking about setting one up for a business but I'm not sure would it be worth it.

    Does it make that much difference to potential customers that the contact number is freephone?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 27 dclare


    My experience is that an 1890 or 1850 number is the better way to go. It offers many of the benefits of the freephone number, without the same ongoing cost.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69 ✭✭louth87


    RoadKillTs wrote: »
    Does it make that much difference to potential customers that the contact number is freephone?


    Depends who your target market is really I suppose, i.e. if your aiming for students for example it may be more of an appeal to get in touch


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,710 ✭✭✭RoadKillTs


    Depends who your target market is really I suppose, i.e. if your aiming for students for example it may be more of an appeal to get in touch

    Target audience is quite wide. 18 - 60 bracket.
    Also the majority of calls would be quite long in duration which wouldn't help :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,710 ✭✭✭RoadKillTs


    Ok lets say for example I setup an 1800 number. Then if a potential customer calls I could take down their details and call them back through Skype
    Would that work?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,257 ✭✭✭blue4ever


    RoadKillTs wrote: »
    Ok lets say for example I setup an 1800 number. Then if a potential customer calls I could take down their details and call them back through Skype
    Would that work?

    Great thing about freephone is that you can used them for advertising only (as opposed to your land line) so you can begin to track the response rates.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 27 dclare


    blue4ever wrote: »
    Great thing about freephone is that you can used them for advertising only (as opposed to your land line) so you can begin to track the response rates.

    The same thing goes for 1850 & 1890 numbers. Keep in mind your profit margins too - if your sales margins are pretty small, a lo-call number will work out better than a free phone one.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,710 ✭✭✭RoadKillTs


    The same thing goes for 1850 & 1890 numbers. Keep in mind your profit margins too - if your sales margins are pretty small, a lo-call number will work out better than a free phone one.

    Starting to think they might be a better option. Just had a look at that price list on Eircoms site. Some of the rates are extortionate.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 112 ✭✭VO


    RoadKillTs wrote: »
    Hi,

    Does anyone have any experience in setting up a 1800 number?
    And if so do you think that it is worth the extra expense?

    Thanks


    Edit: Or number :)


    Lo-call 1890, 1850 or 0818 are certainly much more economical than 1800 and can be just as effective. Really it depends on the type of business you are in. PM me if you wish to find out where you can pay line rental of €20 per month + call charges.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2 ellrules


    darc wrote: »
    problem with lo call is that it is 30c a minute to call from a mobile even if you have a bundle of minutes, also with most mobiles and lanlines you get calls included, so a easy to remember land line number is as good as a lo call or offer both.

    Agree with ya there - it infuriates me that the busines is trying to be accessible by giving an 1 80 number and the opposite is the case once the mobule phone operators get their hands on it - the cost is a multiple of what an otdinary call on mobile is =Wher is the Comm reg now when you need them - are you listening comm reg..:mad::mad::mad::mad:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,055 ✭✭✭probe


    A geographic number is the cheapest option for both parties - eg 01 234 5678. Very often the caller has a bundle of minutes paid for every month, so it doesn't really cost them anything to call a geographic number. And it is free to the called party.

    1-800 numbers are a pain for the recipient - especially from mobiles - high cost. Can't be called from outside the state.

    1-8other numbers cost both the caller and called party for every call. They are just a telecommunications industry rip-off and can't be reached from outside the country either.

    You can't use direct dialling inwards with these non-geographic phone numbers - so staff waste time passing calls from one to the next until the correct person gets to deal with the call.

    The most functional set-up is to use geographic numbers, publishing a direct dial number for the appropriate individual/department who deals with the matter.

    Anything else is generally dysfunctional, a waste of time, staff costs, customer time and phone expenses.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 203 ✭✭AMPSound


    Yeah, have you investigated SkypeIn numbers? Get a nice geographical number, even if you are not based in that area.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,465 ✭✭✭MOH


    AMPSound wrote: »
    Yeah, have you investigated SkypeIn numbers? Get a nice geographical number, even if you are not based in that area.

    Or Blueface offer a similar option. I'm looking at both at the moment, although I've heard call quality is better on blueface


Advertisement