Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Intercompany Management Charges

  • 25-05-2009 3:13pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 881 ✭✭✭


    Does anyone know of there are any anti-avoidance provisions for excess management charges between connected copanies?


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,094 ✭✭✭dbran


    Hi

    I suspect you would have to have some rational for them.

    For example if there were management charges to a dormant company say, you would not really be able to argue the management charges. What is there to manage? It is dormant. But if there was in increase in the eg volume of work or costs incurred by one company on behalf of another, which are quantifiable, then an increase in the management charges would be appropriate and allowed.

    As for anti avoidence, in general you cannot have an artificial transaction the sole purpose of it being to avoid paying tax. This is throughout tax legislation.

    There must be an underlying commercial reason for the management charge. If there is not then it may be subject to attack by the revenue.

    DB


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 881 ✭✭✭censuspro


    Im aware of the anti avoidance provisions, however this is not the case in this scenario. Effectively, the directors want to shift all the assets and reserves from one company to another and were considering doing this via management charges. I understand that assets can be moved interco via group relief however the companies are not part of a group but just share common directors and shareholders.


Advertisement