Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

info recieved

  • 05-05-2009 9:16pm
    #1
    old boy
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,658 ✭✭✭


    the social welfare inspector called recently, he read out a list of alligations made by an unamed party against us, we asked who made the alligations he refused saying it was confidintal information, is it possible under the freedom of information act to find out who made the alligations , thanks in advance.


Comments

  • #2
    Xiney
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,085 ✭✭✭Xiney


    no, because the information of who turned you in isn't information about you, but about someone else, which you have no right to know.


  • #3
    IT Loser
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,311 ✭✭✭IT Loser


    old boy wrote: »
    the social welfare inspector called recently, he read out a list of alligations made by an unamed party against us, we asked who made the alligations he refused saying it was confidintal information, is it possible under the freedom of information act to find out who made the alligations , thanks in advance.


    You are entitled to know

    {a} the nature of the charge against you

    {b} the gravity/effect of the charge against you

    {c} the time you have allowed to appeal against them


  • #4
    old boy
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,658 ✭✭✭old boy


    the charges were easily dealt with, it seems a trouble maker had their facts wrong.


  • #5
    IT Loser
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,311 ✭✭✭IT Loser


    old boy wrote: »
    the charges were easily dealt with, it seems a trouble maker had their facts wrong.

    Well done. There is always one.:cool:


Advertisement