Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Munster V Leinster Act 2

  • 15-04-2009 1:01pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 30


    Well we're here again. Munster V Leinster, this time however the stakes are much higher. Also Munster haven't the comfort of Thomond to fall back on. The 'experts' have suggested it will be Munster without too much problems. However my analysis shows a different story. On paper ....
    The Leinster backline more than matches the Munster backline - this is assuming that Contepomi turns up, which I'm pretty sure he will. The Leinster front row will more than match the Munster front row. The Leinster back row can again match the Munster back row. The only area that I believe Munster to have an advantage is the second row. I think POC and DOC are more industrious than Cullen, O'Kelly. I think the line outs will see parity and Leinster may have the upper hand in the scrums. So all in all I think its going to be a much closer match than the media are making out. Comments?


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,637 ✭✭✭CoDy1


    I assume this means you know more than the 'experts' then?;)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 30 rugbynut


    For Gods sake I'm just expressing an opinion.
    CoDy1 wrote: »
    I assume this means you know more than the 'experts' then?;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 613 ✭✭✭smog


    What was wrong with any of the other threads discussing this ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,848 ✭✭✭bleg


    smog wrote: »
    What was wrong with any of the other threads discussing this ?


    not enough expert opinion


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,433 ✭✭✭✭thomond2006


    bleg wrote: »
    not enough expert opinion

    +1. :D:D


  • Advertisement
Advertisement