Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

complete noob questions...

  • 09-04-2009 2:32am
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 375 ✭✭


    ok, i like watching a good soccer match, but a couple of things annoy/confuse me

    whats the 'obstruction' rule? and why is it ok to shepard a ball out of play/ back to your 'keeper'?

    and direct/indirect free kicks
    i know its inderict if its a pass-back to the keeper, and he picks it up, is there any other cases where its inderect?
    any other cases where its a free kick inside the penalty area?
    any case where its an actual 'direct' free kick, apart from penalty kick

    cheers


    edit
    i get the offside rule ;)


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,235 ✭✭✭iregk


    edit
    i get the offside rule ;)

    Excellent. Fancy explaining it to the rest of us, none of us here do!!!!:D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 41,926 ✭✭✭✭_blank_


    whats the 'obstruction' rule? and why is it ok to shepard a ball out of play/ back to your 'keeper'?

    It should be obstruction when a player does that, but the vast majority of referee turn a blind eye.

    Don't ask why, they also turn a blind eye to foul throws in the top level of the game, much to my own personal distaste.

    and direct/indirect free kicks
    i know its inderict if its a pass-back to the keeper, and he picks it up, is there any other cases where its inderect?
    Law 12 Covers this question

    An indirect free kick is awarded to the opposing team if a goalkeeper, inside his own penalty area, commits any of the following offences:

    takes more than six seconds while controlling the ball with his hands, before releasing it from his possession

    touches the ball again with his hands after it has been released from his possession and has not touched any other player

    touches the ball with his hands after it has been deliberately kicked to him by a team-mate

    touches the ball with his hands after he has received it directly from a throw-in taken by a team-mate

    An indirect free kick is also awarded to the opposing team if a player, in the opinion of the referee, commits any of the following three offences:

    plays in a dangerous manner

    impedes the progress of an opponent

    prevents the goalkeeper from releasing the ball from his hands

    commits any other offence, not previously mentioned in Law 12, for which play is stopped to caution or dismiss a player

    The indirect free kick is taken from where the offence occurred.


    any other cases where its a free kick inside the penalty area?
    An Indirect Free Kick?

    See above.
    any case where its an actual 'direct' free kick, apart from penalty kick

    An offence which would normally result in a Direct Free Kick being awarded to the attacking team in the penalty area, is a penalty.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,518 ✭✭✭matrim


    whats the 'obstruction' rule? and why is it ok to shepard a ball out of play/ back to your 'keeper'?

    My View on this is that you are deemed to be in control of the ball even though you haven't actually touched it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,407 ✭✭✭Quint


    matrim wrote: »
    My View on this is that you are deemed to be in control of the ball even though you haven't actually touched it.
    Correct!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,625 ✭✭✭✭BaZmO*


    matrim wrote: »
    My View on this is that you are deemed to be in control of the ball even though you haven't actually touched it.
    Yeah that was my view of it too. Nonetheless it's quite annoying.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,535 ✭✭✭joe123


    Des wrote: »
    An offence which would normally result in a Direct Free Kick being awarded to the attacking team in the penalty area, is a penalty.

    Your allowed pass the ball taking a penalty arent you? ala Henry/Pires debacle a few years back.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,225 ✭✭✭Chardee MacDennis


    yes and you're also allowed to pass the ball from a direct free kick... if i have understood your point correctly!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,824 ✭✭✭ShooterSF


    joe123 wrote: »
    Your allowed pass the ball taking a penalty arent you? ala Henry/Pires debacle a few years back.

    Direct doesn't mean you have to shoot no matter what ya learned playin wembo ;)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 375 ✭✭im_invisible


    joe123 wrote: »
    Your allowed pass the ball taking a penalty arent you?
    cheers for the replies, you learn something new every day


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 41,926 ✭✭✭✭_blank_


    cheers for the replies, you learn something new every day

    A penalty is just a special kind of Direct Free Kick.

    Picture this.

    Liverpool gat a Direct Free Kick on the edge of the box.

    Sometimes the ball is just rolled to Steven Gerrard to shoot.

    Sometimes Direct Free Kicks are awarded in the centre circle, and a pass goes sideways to a winger, or maybe even backwards to a defender. You don't have to shoot, and you can kick the ball in any direction you want.

    When it comes to a penalty, if you want to pass the ball, you better make sure the player who is going to receive the pass is behind or level with the ball, because it he is ahead of the ball, and the ball is played forward to him, he will be flagged offside.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,625 ✭✭✭✭BaZmO*


    Des wrote: »
    When it comes to a penalty, if you want to pass the ball, you better make sure the player who is going to receive the pass is behind or level with the ball, because it he is ahead of the ball, and the ball is played forward to him, he will be flagged offside.
    Huh? You have to be outside the box anyway.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 41,926 ✭✭✭✭_blank_


    BaZmO* wrote: »
    Huh? You have to be outside the box anyway.

    Of course. Apologies.

    When it comes to a Direct Free Kick, including a penalty, the taker may not touch the ball a second time.

    Which is the very reason this type of free kick was banned



    The guy who flicks it up, touches it twice.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,625 ✭✭✭✭BaZmO*


    Did he touch it twice?

    Also, is it true that only the taker of the penalty is allowed to place the ball on the spot?
    I think I remember seeing it as a reason for a penalty being disallowed on a Question of Sport years ago.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 41,926 ✭✭✭✭_blank_


    BaZmO* wrote: »
    Did he touch it twice?

    Both feet/legs couldn't have touched the ball at the same time ;)

    Regarding your other question, Law 14 deals with the Penalty Kick in some detail, and doesn't mention that the penalty taker must place the ball.

    But.

    The ball:
    is placed on the penalty mark

    The player taking the penalty kick:
    is properly identified

    The defending goalkeeper:
    remains on his goal line, facing the kicker, between the goalposts until the ball has been kicked


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,625 ✭✭✭✭BaZmO*


    Des wrote: »
    Both feet/legs couldn't have touched the ball at the same time ;)
    Ha. true!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,824 ✭✭✭ShooterSF


    A technical one I've always wondered. Should a peno be retaken if scored but the keeper was off his line as it was took or should a kind of advantage be played?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 119 ✭✭Pigman III


    Doesn't an indirect free kick also occur in situation's of simulation on the opposing players part?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,625 ✭✭✭✭BaZmO*


    ShooterSF wrote: »
    A technical one I've always wondered. Should a peno be retaken if scored but the keeper was off his line as it was took or should a kind of advantage be played?
    I'd imagine the latter. Not sure what the rules say though.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 41,926 ✭✭✭✭_blank_


    ShooterSF wrote: »
    A technical one I've always wondered. Should a peno be retaken if scored but the keeper was off his line as it was took or should a kind of advantage be played?

    Back to Law 12 for this

    The goalkeeper infringes the Laws of the Game:

    - the referee allows the kick to proceed
    - if the ball enters the goal, a goal is awarded
    - if the ball does not enter the goal, the kick is retaken


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 41,926 ✭✭✭✭_blank_


    Actually, in contradiction to what I said earlier.

    A penalty must be played forward, according to Law 12


    Procedure

    - the player taking the penalty kicks the ball forward
    - he does not play the ball a second time until it has touched another player
    - the ball is in play when it is kicked and moves forward


    Learn something new every day. :)


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 41,926 ✭✭✭✭_blank_


    BaZmO* wrote: »
    I'd imagine the latter. Not sure what the rules say though.

    Association Football has no rules.

    It has Laws, the referees are the judges charged with interpreting those laws.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,824 ✭✭✭ShooterSF


    Quite the little informative thread/des we have here :) Also it hasn't descended into team x vs team y. Niiicccceeee.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 41,926 ✭✭✭✭_blank_


    Qualified Ref so I am. :)

    Also, I like to know the Laws off by heart so I can beat refs over the head with it if they go against us in the league :pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,518 ✭✭✭matrim


    Des wrote: »
    Actually, in contradiction to what I said earlier.

    A penalty must be played forward, according to Law 12


    Procedure

    - the player taking the penalty kicks the ball forward
    - he does not play the ball a second time until it has touched another player
    - the ball is in play when it is kicked and moves forward


    Learn something new every day. :)

    Yeah, a penalty and kick off must both be played forward. I'm not aware of any other type of free / set piece that must be played forward.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 634 ✭✭✭pierrot


    Indirect freekicks seem to have disappeared in the last couple of years, no? Rarely see one given now. Was this an official directive for the referees i wonder.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 41,926 ✭✭✭✭_blank_


    matrim wrote: »
    I'm not aware of any other type of free / set piece that must be played forward.

    The Kick Off

    Law 8 - The Start and Re-Start of Play


    Procedure

    all players are in their own half of the field

    the opponents of the team taking the kick-off are at least 9.15 m (10 yds) from the ball until it is in play

    the ball is stationary on the centre mark

    the referee gives a signal

    the ball is in play when it is kicked and moves forward

    the kicker does not touch the ball a second time until it has touched another player

    After a team scores a goal, the kick-off is taken by the other team

    If the kicker touches the ball a second time before it has touched another player:

    an indirect free kick is awarded to the opposing team to be taken from the place where the infringement occurred* (see preface)
    .


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 41,926 ✭✭✭✭_blank_


    pierrot wrote: »
    Indirect freekicks seem to have disappeared in the last couple of years, no? Rarely see one given now. Was this an official directive for the referees i wonder.

    An indirect free kick is given every time an off-side offence is penalised by the referee.

    You just don't see many other infringements which would be punishable by an indirect free kick.

    Obstruction seems to have been phased out, granted, for whatever reason.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,919 ✭✭✭✭Xavi6


    pierrot wrote: »
    Indirect freekicks seem to have disappeared in the last couple of years, no? Rarely see one given now. Was this an official directive for the referees i wonder.

    Backpasses. See Ronaldo v Villa for a recent example.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 634 ✭✭✭pierrot


    Yeah, obstruction and backpass. I remember we would give them for 'accidental handball' until i discovered this was a malaprop, handball by definition is deliberate according to the laws.
    Can you clear that up please Des? It has led to me arguing possibly every handball given in games. I know it's difficult for the ref to judge whether or not handball is deliberate.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 41,926 ✭✭✭✭_blank_


    If a handball is being penalised, it is definitely a Direct Free Kick

    There is no such thing as an "accidental hand ball" offence - as only "deliberate hand ball" is punishable.

    Law 12 - Fouls and Misconduct

    A direct free kick is awarded to the opposing team if a player commits any of the following six offences in a manner considered by the referee to be careless, reckless or using excessive force:

    kicks or attempts to kick an opponent

    trips or attempts to trip an opponent

    jumps at an opponent - John Terry last night, imo

    charges an opponent

    strikes or attempts to strike an opponent

    pushes an opponent

    A direct free kick is also awarded to the opposing team if a player commits any of the following four offences:

    tackles an opponent to gain possession of the ball, making contact with the opponent before touching the ball

    holds an opponent

    spits at an opponent

    handles the ball deliberately (except for the goalkeeper within his own penalty area)


    So, accidental hand ball is not an offence, under the laws of the game, if no offence occurs, there is no punishment, so any referee blowing up for an accidental handball, and giving an Indirect Free Kick is an absolute clown.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 634 ✭✭✭pierrot


    Yep, that's what I thought. And if thats the case, does that not rule out most of handballs that are given week in week out?
    Btw, when i said 'we would give them', I meant years ago in school :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 41,926 ✭✭✭✭_blank_


    pierrot wrote: »
    And if thats the case, does that not rule out most of handballs that are given week in week out?

    Depends on the ref, if he interprets it as deliberate, he has to give the free kick/penalty.

    Incidentally, speaking of clownish refs and mad interpretations of laws.

    Law 12

    An indirect free kick is awarded to the opposing team if a goalkeeper, inside his own penalty area, commits any of the following offences:

    takes more than six seconds while controlling the ball with his hands, before releasing it from his possession

    touches the ball again with his hands after it has been released from his possession and has not touched any other player

    touches the ball with his hands after it has been deliberately kicked to him by a team-mate

    touches the ball with his hands after he has received it directly from a throw-in taken by a team-mate


    The highlighted part above.

    I remember one referee would penalise the goalkeeper if he bounced the ball before kicking or throwing it, in an extremely literal interpretation of that Law.

    He was a clown.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,372 ✭✭✭✭Mr Alan


    Des wrote: »
    I remember one referee would penalise the goalkeeper if he bounced the ball before kicking or throwing it, in an extremely literal interpretation of that Law.

    He was a clown.

    that was you, wasnt it?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 375 ✭✭im_invisible


    Des wrote: »
    A penalty must be played forward, according to Law 12

    Procedure
    - the player taking the penalty kicks the ball forward
    - he does not play the ball a second time until it has touched another player
    ....
    so, if a player takes a penalty, and the ball hits the post/crossbar, and comes back, he cant touch it again?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 41,926 ✭✭✭✭_blank_


    so, if a player takes a penalty, and the ball hits the post/crossbar, and comes back, he cant touch it again?

    This is correct, for a Penalty/Free Kick/Corner/Throw/Kick Off, the taker may only touch the ball once, and may not touch it again until another player, from his own team or the other team, touches it after him.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,625 ✭✭✭✭BaZmO*


    Good point about the "Laws" over "Rules" and I suppose that's always were the confusion arises in some decisions in that it is an interpretation rather than a strict adherence to the rules.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 217 ✭✭geurrp the yard


    BaZmO* wrote: »
    Good point about the "Laws" over "Rules" and I suppose that's always were the confusion arises in some decisions in that it is an interpretation rather than a strict adherence to the rules.


    Another rule fairly common in schoolboy is when a player shouts "mine" or "my ball". This is deemed as dangerous play and a indirect free is awarded. Never seen it implemented in the premiership or top level football.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,704 ✭✭✭Broxi_Bear_Eire


    Another rule fairly common in schoolboy is when a player shouts "mine" or "my ball". This is deemed as dangerous play and a indirect free is awarded. Never seen it implemented in the premiership or top level football.

    Don't think its classed as dangerous play more ungentlemanly conduct you are supposed to call a name


Advertisement