Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Metro North route via Depts Health & Education

  • 08-04-2009 9:56am
    #1
    IIMII
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,366 ✭✭✭


    Anyone know why Metro North wasn't proposed to have stations say at the Department of Health (Hawkins Street) and Education (Marlborough Street) to avoid digging up O'Connell Street etc? I heard recently that the Department of Health building is almost 'life expired' (plus an eye-sore) so would this proposal not have made some sense?
    Tagged:


Comments

  • #2
    SeanW
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,168 ✭✭✭SeanW


    Why would you not want to have a station on O'Connell St? The long term benefits of having a station on the city's main street will surely negate the short term digging?


  • #3
    IIMII
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,366 ✭✭✭IIMII


    I didn't say I didn't want a station in O'Connell street, but sackville lane (or is it place) is only what 100m long? I'm not arguing either way, just asking


  • #4
    Stupido
    Closed Accounts Posts: 164 ✭✭Stupido


    IIMII wrote: »
    Anyone know why Metro North wasn't proposed to have stations say at the Department of Health (Hawkins Street) and Education (Marlborough Street) to avoid digging up O'Connell Street etc? I heard recently that the Department of Health building is almost 'life expired' (plus an eye-sore) so would this proposal not have made some sense?


    They are protected structures at Marlborough street...why would they be life expired?

    I think you refer to Hawkins house on Hawkins Street.


    BTW the station hole would have been too great for the green area at Marlborough street I believe


  • #5
    L1011
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71,186 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Stupido wrote: »
    They are protected structures at Marlborough street...why would they be life expired?

    I think you refer to Hawkins house on Hawkins Street.


    BTW the station hole would have been too great for the green area at Marlborough street I believe

    He said it was Health's building which was life expired. That would be the horrific, almost brutalist (but not brutalist enough to give it architectural merit) Hawkins House.


  • #6
    IIMII
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,366 ✭✭✭IIMII


    Cheers lads. It just seemed an obvious question to ask (completely irrelevant at this anyway whether it's built or not, and I do like the O'Connell street stations etc) but it seemed like an option which might have taken away some of the ire of the business community (and gotten rid of the pig-ugly Hawkins house).


  • Advertisement
  • #7
    ODS
    Closed Accounts Posts: 380 ✭✭ODS


    IIMII wrote: »
    it seemed like an option which might have taken away some of the ire of the business community

    This is correct - not closing down O'C st during excavation, and also the futility of building 2 underground lines at two different widths.


  • #8
    Victor
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78,580 ✭✭✭✭Victor


    Actually, if you go throguh the evidence on the RPA website, they talk about this. They would have to acquire and demolish several properties.


Advertisement