Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Gigabit network faster... much faster than SATAII transfers

  • 28-03-2009 11:09pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,067 ✭✭✭


    Just wondering if this is normal. When moving large ISO's between 2 disks internal to my PC I get around ~70MB/s. But when transferring the same files over my gigabit network between 2 PC's I'm getting around 95MB/s :confused:

    What gives? Is it the controller being overloaded? Vistas crap data transfer speeds?

    Wondering if there's a way to fix this, or should I just move all my internal drives into a gigabit NAS?


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,874 ✭✭✭✭PogMoThoin


    L31mr0d wrote: »
    Vistas crap data transfer speeds?

    I've a Vista, Xp and linux setup with a linux home server and my best speeds are from Xp, seconded by linux, then Vista. I get 60+MB/s from Xp, 45MB/s from linux and 22MB/s from Vista moving the same file over a gigabit network


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,067 ✭✭✭L31mr0d


    PogMoThoin wrote: »
    22MB/s from Vista moving the same file over a gigabit network

    thing is I'm getting 95MB/s transfer speeds over the gigabit network in Vista (I have IPv6 and QoS disabled and on the NIC, "Jumbo Packets" set to 9014 bytes and "speed and dublex" forced to 1000Mbps Full duplex) I'm also using all Cat6 cables.

    The network isn't the issue, I'm getting great speeds from it. The odd thing is the disk transfers over the SATA controller, I just transferred a few more ISO's there for backup and it didn't break 50MB/s.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,472 ✭✭✭✭Ghost Train


    PogMoThoin wrote: »
    I've a Vista, Xp and linux setup with a linux home server and my best speeds are from Xp, seconded by linux, then Vista. I get 60+MB/s from Xp, 45MB/s from linux and 22MB/s from Vista moving the same file over a gigabit network


    theres a fix for vistas network speed problem(bug)

    http://apcmag.com/how_to_fix_vistas_network_bottlenecks.htm


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,501 ✭✭✭BrokenArrows


    theres a fix for vistas network speed problem(bug)

    http://apcmag.com/how_to_fix_vistas_network_bottlenecks.htm


    the problem isn't with his network. thats working fine.

    are you positive your transferring it between two separate harddrives and not two partitioned drives?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,067 ✭✭✭L31mr0d


    the problem isn't with his network. thats working fine.

    are you positive your transferring it between two separate harddrives and not two partitioned drives?

    yeah 2 separate drives. Its the exact same problem on both of my Vista PC's, ones running x64 and the other x32. The transfer speeds between physical drives is abysmal.

    Both PC's have completely different drives by different manufacturers and have completely different motherboards and SATA controllers. The only thing they have in common is Vista :(


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,501 ✭✭✭BrokenArrows


    L31mr0d wrote: »
    yeah 2 separate drives. Its the exact same problem on both of my Vista PC's, ones running x64 and the other x32. The transfer speeds between physical drives is abysmal.

    Both PC's have completely different drives by different manufacturers and have completely different motherboards and SATA controllers. The only thing they have in common is Vista :(


    not sure if this would cause an issue or not but do you have something inbetween the two HD's

    examples HD -> DVD drive -> HD all on the same cable.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,874 ✭✭✭✭PogMoThoin


    not sure if this would cause an issue or not but do you have something inbetween the two HD's

    examples HD -> DVD drive -> HD all on the same cable.

    They're Sata so thats not the issue, in fact its a long time since I came across ide hd's


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,864 ✭✭✭uberpixie


    in a previous horrible tech support job, I supported Vista from launch day for very ungrateful home users.

    I worked with a lot of eastern european lads and an english amiga nutjob who all loved total commander.

    They of course went off and installed it on vista the first chance they got and they noticed that when total commander was installed: local file tranfers and network transfers were much faster. Even copying a file from the desktop to a different folder on the same harddrive was much faster.

    http://www.ghisler.com/
    (you can a 30 day shareware verson here)

    I would give it a go and see if there is any difference. (I'm still on XP myself so can't Test :D)

    I would reckon the issue is with Vista's version of explorer and not your hardware.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,983 ✭✭✭leninbenjamin


    L31mr0d wrote: »
    yeah 2 separate drives. Its the exact same problem on both of my Vista PC's, ones running x64 and the other x32. The transfer speeds between physical drives is abysmal.

    Both PC's have completely different drives by different manufacturers and have completely different motherboards and SATA controllers. The only thing they have in common is Vista :(

    Hmmm... i have two HDs in my laptop running Vista and also find them incredibly slow to write between. i always just assumed it was a quirk of the hardware...


Advertisement