Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

A Question on Rules

  • 23-03-2009 10:36am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 381 ✭✭


    A question on the rules for all you rugby experts.

    I know you are not allowed charge down a penalty, but are you allowed stop it from going over the crossbar?

    Stephen Jones is not the longest of Kickers so I was wondering in Sat as he lined up the kick could we have set up our lineout lifters & jumpers to try and catch the ball if it (in reach obviously) was going over?


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,263 ✭✭✭✭Eoin


    Ireland and/or Leinster used to do that - I think it was Victor Costello that would have another player on his shoulders standing in front of the posts. Not sure if they changed the law on that though since.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,958 ✭✭✭✭RuggieBear


    not allowed do it anymore. john eales did it a few times with lifters


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,326 ✭✭✭Serenity Now!


    Repolho wrote: »
    Stephen Jones is not the longest of Kickers
    Where are people getting this from??? Wales' second score was from 49m and a little wider an angle than the last kick of the game. :rolleyes:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 47 donnchadhc


    Where are people getting this from??? Wales' second score was from 49m and a little wider an angle than the last kick of the game. :rolleyes:

    I think people have Henson in mind with this one, he has the longer boot. However it should have been in Jones range, but it was a tired kick. Just goes to show what 80 mins in a test match can do to even the fittest of professionals! :eek: By the way, the laws are that you can charge down a conversion but you can't charge down a penalty. The IRB just clarified the interpretation to mean something more akin to "interfereing" with a peno.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,466 ✭✭✭Blisterman


    When is it no longer considered charging a kick in general, and becomes a knock on? When the ball starts it's downwards projectory?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,178 ✭✭✭kevmy


    Also can someone tell me why more people don't go for a drop kick conversion? I mean if you get a try right under the posts in a tight match surely a drop kick conversion would be a handy way to get an extra point. Is it because it would be charged down?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,263 ✭✭✭✭Eoin


    You don't get an extra point for drop-kicking a conversion.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 381 ✭✭Repolho


    Where are people getting this from??? Wales' second score was from 49m and a little wider an angle than the last kick of the game. :rolleyes:

    I've no stats or anything to back it up, but Wales have used Henson and Halfpenny to take on some of the longer kicks this season.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,263 ✭✭✭✭Eoin


    Repolho wrote: »
    I've no stats or anything to back it up, but Wales have used Henson and Halfpenny to take on some of the longer kicks this season.

    Yep, Henson has a long boot, but I'd say Jones gets the first refusal as he is the main kicker. He nailed two kicks that were in the same range in the first half. Apparently Henson didn't feel up to it either.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 28,100 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    kevmy wrote: »
    Also can someone tell me why more people don't go for a drop kick conversion? I mean if you get a try right under the posts in a tight match surely a drop kick conversion would be a handy way to get an extra point. Is it because it would be charged down?

    You still only get two points for a drop kicked conversion. Though why teams don't do it more often when they're trying to get multiple scores and time is not on their side is beyond me.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 182 ✭✭ScholesyIsGod


    Because it takes hardly no time at all to set the ball on a tee and slot it over, plus you're not going to be trying to drop kick it over if you score a try in the corner.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 522 ✭✭✭barnesd


    Kickers still tee it up in front of the posts because repeatability is one of the most important things to a kicker. They want the exact same motion for every single kick, and obviously you aren't going to get this if you're dropping your conversions. If you're really short of time and in front of the posts then drop it by all means but otherwise they're better of with a tee.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 28,100 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    barnesd wrote: »
    Kickers still tee it up in front of the posts because repeatability is one of the most important things to a kicker. They want the exact same motion for every single kick, and obviously you aren't going to get this if you're dropping your conversions. If you're really short of time and in front of the posts then drop it by all means but otherwise they're better of with a tee.

    I get that, but I've seen teams 2/3/4 points down having just scored a try near the posts and they go through the whole rigamarole for the conversion, which can take up to almost a minute with some of them. I'm just surprised that its almost never done (I've never seen it at any rate).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,263 ✭✭✭✭Eoin


    I've seen it done a couple of times when there are a few minutes left and a team has to rack up a score. One of the times our kicker rushed it and missed the conversion altogether. Not only did we not get a score after that, but the missed conversion cost us a losing bonus point.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,326 ✭✭✭Serenity Now!


    Repolho wrote: »
    I've no stats or anything to back it up, but Wales have used Henson and Halfpenny to take on some of the longer kicks this season.

    Henson's long range abilities still don't explain this silly alleged lack of range regarding Stephen Jones (despite his 49m effort in the same game)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 47 donnchadhc


    Blisterman wrote: »
    When is it no longer considered charging a kick in general, and becomes a knock on? When the ball starts it's downwards projectory?

    Pretty much, but its got a lot to do with ref's discretion. When its falling down you're trying to catch the ball (so you can knock it on), whereas when its on its way up your blocking a kick.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 381 ✭✭Repolho


    Henson's long range abilities still don't explain this silly alleged lack of range regarding Stephen Jones (despite his 49m effort in the same game)

    I didn't say he had only a short range, I merely said that he wasn't the longest of kickers.

    Perhaps if I rephrase it to say that as he was approaching the limit of his range at 48-49m?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 170 ✭✭Ulstermell0


    Henson's long range abilities still don't explain this silly alleged lack of range regarding Stephen Jones (despite his 49m effort in the same game)

    As Jones lined up for the kick a wales fan tapped my dad on the shoulder offered his hand and said 'well done, you've won. Jones hasn't got the range for this.' his comments throughout the game were pretty spot on as well.


Advertisement