Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Quick Carbonyl Question

  • 18-03-2009 10:38pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 93 ✭✭


    Hey, I need to know, can a carbonyl carbon which is singly bonded to two differenct alkyl groups be termed an assymetric carbon atom?
    Cheers.


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 149 ✭✭napapa


    yes because the alkyl chains are of different length, whereas acetone is symmetric.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 717 ✭✭✭Mucco


    I would say no, as it's planar and therefore has a plane of symmetry.
    It can be deemed pro-chiral though, as the two faces of the carbonyl are different. This means that it's one step away from a chiral carbon, for instance, is you react it with a Grignard, you'll get two enantiomers.

    The two faces of a carbonyl can be assigned by the CIP rules 're' and 'si'.

    M


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,740 ✭✭✭dirtyden


    Its not chiral, it is prochiral, carbons with C2 symmetry are not chiral. As a previous poster pointed out either face of the carbonyl 'may' differentiate in a chiral enviroment and nuceophilic substitution may yield a chiral product.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,235 ✭✭✭Dave147


    No, absolutely not.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 149 ✭✭napapa


    I stand corrected. Apologies for misleading information, chirality was never my forte so shouldn't really comment on it. Thanks for correct explanation.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement